Guest guest Posted July 8, 2001 Report Share Posted July 8, 2001 Srimadh Azhagiya Singar thiruvadikaLE saraNam (Summary: One more reference is presented for poRuth " thEn " . The 2nd of the 21 thEn is referred here as iRuth " thEn " . The phrase " poRuL, inbam " or Arttha and kAmA is extensively discussed). thiru viNNagarath thEn - part 7 - iRuth " thEn " Dear bAgawathAs, Earlier it was cited that the " nenchil poRuththiya thEn " was none other than the nitya thEn thAyAr HERself. When thAyAr (who is residing in the thirumArbu) gets pradhAnam in a thiru nAmam (example " poo maNNu mAthu porunthiya mArban " of Sri rAmAnuja nooRRu anthAthi) such perumaL gets the radiance of " poN niRam " or golden color due to the very presence, pradhAnanam & influence (medaitrix) of the thAyAr (in the thiru mArbu). Such Lord is known as " Pon niRam " porunthia appan or ponnappan (*). The word iruth " thEn " comes from iRu. " iRu " has several meanings of which one of the main meaning is " to give " . iRuth " thEn " means adiyEn gave up. What are the things that Sri AzhwAr gave up ? These are " poruL " and " inbam " or ArthA and kAmA. ie..Sri AzhwAr gave up his attachement to artthA and kAmam. Besides this direct meaning, the phrase " poRuL, inbam " is used in many different ways in this pasuram. Importantly this phrase is sandwiched between two other phrases and is used by both these two phrases as well. ie.. The first three phrases are as follows. 1. PoRutthEn pun sol nenchil 2. poRul inbam ena irAndum iRutthEn 3. Aim pulankatku kadan Ayina vAyil otti aRuththEn Hence there are three main usage for this phrase " poruL, inbam " . In this part we will see as to how it is used in connection with the first phrase. ie.. Currently we will see as to how it is used for the phrase " poRutthEn pun sol " . If Sri AzhwAr has to provide materialistic gifts to the so called bandhukkaL mentioned in the earlier pravEsam, then he has to have the material in abundance to give them. Material can be in any form. Money, gold, dravyam, rice, food and so on. It seems Sri AzhwAr have been giving out all these things to his bandhukkaL for a long time hoping that some of them will try to live as a Srivaishanava. However it didnot happen as mentioned earlier and they all behaved like an avaishnava. When one do " sthuthi pAdal " (praising one) it was all meant for fetching all these ArtthAs or materials. It is said that during the early century many " kavis " or poets used to sing in praise of the Kings and Lords and get rewarded with so much of materials such as gold, cow, land rice, etc. adiyEn gave up all such materials and helped all the bandhukkaLs. adiyEn had the pleasure of giving up all these arthAs. This is anyway an Oru alpa santhOsham. But adiyEn derived immense pleasure in parting these materials to the bhandus. The inbam or kAmA need not be a sexual feeling alone. Inbam can be termed as joy as well. ie.. adiyEn gave up all the attachment to arthAs or materials and derived a great joy by giving them to many. But adiyEn gave up that joy also as adiyEn realised the greatest of all the joy is to serve you my lord Sri thEnappan or Sri Oppiliappan. Sri kumuthavaLLi nAcchiyAr samEtha Sri thirumangai AzhwAr thiruvadikaLE saraNam Sri boomidEvith thAyAr samEtha Sri Oppiliappan thiruvadikaLE saraNam. adiyEn irAmAnusa dAsan thiruk kudanthai Sampath Rengarajan (*) - Thus Sri AzhwAr was also referring to Sri Ponnappan or Sri POnnappath " thEn " of thiruviNNagaram. This viLakkam or explanation on the thiru namam and the Lord Sri POnnappan is provided further in the current series " adiyArkku ennai AtpaduththinAn " on Lord Sri thiru vEngadamudaiyAn. It was also briefly presented in an article titled as " thanthanan thanathAL nizhaLE " published for Sri Oppili appan mAniccka koNdai malar samarppaNam (The contents of this 1999 malar will be published in the web very soon and links will be provided from Sri Oppiliappan web site). _______________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 10, 2001 Report Share Posted July 10, 2001 Sri: SrimatE Gopaladesika MahadesikAya Namaha, Dear Sriman Rengarajan Swamin, Thanks a lot for another evocative posting on Poru Then. This in a nutshell is the quintessence of Our Vedam rooted Sampradayam. Swami Desikan pays tribute to Thayar resident in the Lord's Vakshasthalam and conferring added radiance to the resplendent Lord in the opening verse of the Sri Stuthi through the salutation " BhUshayanthIm sva kAnthyA " . Swami Desikan elaborates upon this train of thought in verse 15 of the Daya Shatakam, wherein He emphatically states that " You (Daya Devi) are the one who makes the Lord what He is. Other Kalyana guNams such as Bala, Aishwarya, Shakti et. al turn out to be verily Doshas in Your absence. " It behoves us to contemplate a little more on this salutation in that " Why are these KalyANa GuNams doshams in the absence of Daya? " Swami Desikan answers this in verses 33 and 34 of the Daya Shatakam, wherein he portrays Daya Devi as the female lawyer representing a Prapanna in the court of the supreme Lord, Narayana. Lord Narayana is an impartial judge (PakshapAthAna Bhigyam), who dispenses justice in strict accordance with the Shastraic injunctions (Shruti and Smruti). Various KalyaNa GuNams attest to violations of the Shastraic injunctions on the part of the erring jivan and recommend suitable punishment to be meted out as a result. In a straightforward case such as this, the erring jivan stands condemned, with absolutely no hope of redemption. Here is where Daya Devi steps in. She seizes her chance upon beholding that the Lord is in the company of His consorts (praguNamanuviDhEyam prApya padhmA sahayam). She argues that " It is absolutely true that the erring jivan is guilty of grave offences. However, so grave are the offences that the jivan has committed that time itself will run out if he has to undergo punishment. That is the jivan has to undergo so many rebirths that time itself will run out. Therefore, punishing him is a futile exercise. " Daya Devi furthermore cites scriptural support for her argument as " Let us for instance consider the Ramayana. In the words of Sita herself, there is nobody who has not erred. The list of sinners includes Sita Devi, Lakshmana, Hanuman, and the Lord Himself. Why? Did not Sita Devi commit Bhagavata apacharam by hurling abuses at Lakshmana, when Lord Rama went after the golden deer? Was not Lakshmana guilty of transgressing the Lord's command (who had instructed him to safeguard Sita while the Lord chased the golden deer) by going to His help? Did not Hanuman (a Brahmachari) suggest to Sita (a Parama Pativratai) that he would carry her on his back and unite her with Rama? Isn't it the Vedic injunction that every man is responsible for protecting his wife under all circumstances? Therefore, Lord Rama too cannot be above blame for placing Sita Devi in a vulnerable position, so that She could be abducted by Ravana. " Daya Devi continues " However are such apacharams punished? No. Therefore, in an analogous manner erring jivans must be forgiven for their enormous sins and be graced by the Lord. " Somewhat mollified, the other KalyaNa GuNams recommend that the jivan perform prayaschittam before being accepted by the Lord. However, Daya Devi eloquently demolishes this argument by stating that " Performance of Prayaschittam requires the jivans to take additional births, during which they accrue more sins. Therefore, even this is a futile measure. Oh Lord please grace the jivan and bless him with eternal Kaimkaryam once right away. " The Lord is pleased with the arguments offered by Daya Devi and instantaneously offers refuge to the erring jivan. An important question that arises in this context is " Who is Daya Devi? " The answer to this is provided by Swami Desikan in verse 18 of the Sri Stuthi, where he states " VishNu kAnthE dayAm thE " , i.e., Thayar is verily the manifestation of the Lord's Daya. Therefore, Daya Devi and Mahalakshmi Thayar are one and the same. What is the connection between " ThEn " and Thayar? Swami Desikan answers this in the opening verse of the Daya Shatakam, wherein he states " yan mUrthyA sharkarAyitham " , i.e., forms of the Lord such as Para, vyUha, Vibhava, and Antharyami are very hard to behold and enjoy. These, while undoubtedly being sweet, are like the hard-to-come-by sugarcane juice. Whereas behold this Archa Murthy of Lord Srinivasa (who is united with Sri both in name as well as through Thayar's residence in His Vakshasthalam), who is a feast to the eyes, like easy to partake of sugar candy. Swami Alavandar succinctly declares in the Chatushloki that even a lifetime is insufficient to fully comprehend the meaning of the word Sri. " Sri ithyE vachanAma thE Bhagavati bruma katham thvAm vayam " . Ahirbudhnyan pays tribute to the blessing of SharaNagati granted by the Divine Couple together in the Mantrarajapada Stothram salutation " shriyAcha BhadrayA juShta: yastham Bhadram namAmyaham " . Bhadram is the name of Bhagavan Nrusimha and Bhadra is the name of Thayar, His consort, who is never separated from the Lord. The Bhadram (protection) afforded jointly by the Divine Couple is unfailing protection of Prapannas-in granting them Moksham (freedom from a seemingly endless cycle of births and deaths on account of Karma) resulting in eternal Kaimkaryam for their performance of SharaNagati. As a by-product they also grant the benefits of Dharma, Artha and Kama to the Prapanna during the latter's earthly existence. The " Then " of eternal Kaimkaryam is sweet nectar for the jivan who has endured the heat of samsaric afflictions. Thanks again for your wonderful summary and please pardon adiyen for his indulgence. Everything correctly stated is entirely due the limitless grace and compassion of adiyen's Acharyan, H.H. Srimad Andavan Swami of Srimad Poundarikapuram Ashramam. All errors are adiyen's contribution. Namo Narayana, SriMuralidhara Dasan , " Sampath Rengarajan " <srengara@h...> wrote: > Srimadh Azhagiya Singar thiruvadikaLE saraNam > > (Summary: One more reference is presented for poRuth " thEn " . The 2nd > of the 21 thEn is referred here as iRuth " thEn " . The phrase " poRuL, > inbam " or Arttha and kAmA is extensively discussed). > > thiru viNNagarath thEn - part 7 - iRuth " thEn " > > Dear bAgawathAs, > > Earlier it was cited that the " nenchil poRuththiya thEn " was > none other than the nitya thEn thAyAr HERself. When thAyAr (who is > residing in the thirumArbu) gets pradhAnam in a thiru nAmam > (example " poo maNNu mAthu porunthiya mArban " of Sri rAmAnuja nooRRu > anthAthi) such perumaL gets the radiance of " poN niRam " or golden > color due to the very presence, pradhAnanam & influence (medaitrix) > of the thAyAr (in the thiru mArbu). Such Lord is known as " Pon > niRam " porunthia appan or ponnappan (*). > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.