Guest guest Posted October 11, 2001 Report Share Posted October 11, 2001 Dear Sri Madhavan: I do not know who you are. Your input is so rude that it intrigues me. I have been involved with number of Kaimakryams and I have never come across such viscious attacks on the integrity of the person involved in such kaimkaryams. Please be assured that no one does these things out of the need for publicity or for lining their pockets . Sriman U.Ve. M.A.VenkatakrishNan swamy of Triplicae has seen the Thridhandam before SamarpaNam . We had requested him at one time to present it to Our EmperumAnAr. His time commitments and the temple calendar did not synchronize . Many others too at Chennai have seen this Multi-layer gold-clad , Copper base ThridhaNDam !. I will continue to call it that until I see it for myself during my next visit to India. If there was any apachAram some where , I will personally supervise a new aabharaNam fitting this description from my own funds. . My sister was the one who supervised the construction of this AabharaNam and had it created at Abhirami Jewelery ., Chennai.If you are that concerned that some body is pulling the wool over the public , please verify for yourself and then tell about it and then imply malfaescence.We spent so much money for the gold cladding , which had to be done by AbhirAmi Jewelery 's special unit at Swamy Malai or KumbakONam , which I am told has the expertise in cladding between copper frame and Gold sheets . I do not know who this religious Dharma KarthA is . I was not there in person. As I explained there , My sister took a lot of trouble to present this ThridhaNDam inspite of the absurd temple politics , where so many hierarchies were involved before the samarpanam could reach Udayavar's hand . It is the bahkthi BhAvam and the ardour that matters in such Kaimkaryams. The temple authorities demanded 5,000 Rs for the execution of this function. I was told by the Sannidhi archakar that the ancient ThridhaNDam had become " khilam ' in Feb 2000 and needed replacement . At that time , I was there to seek Sri PerumbhUthUr Udayavar's blessings for the samarpaNam of the Mudali AaNDAN at Melkote. I considered it as His Niyamanam and few BhakthAs joined in the kaimkaryam . That is the background. I reported what my sister was told at SriperumbhUdhUr on the day of SamarpaNam about the role of the new ThridhaNDam on future occasions. Some one there went to great length to explain that Our Udayavar has diamond and Pearl ThridhaNDam , which are used for special uthsavam, days and rest of the time they sit at the safe. This source was contrasting the future use of the new one that was being presented. My sister did not solicit this information . If the given description was wrong , we have been given wrong information . You must be an expert on the Sri PerumbhUdhUr temple traditions and am glad to know from you that the ancient ThridhaNDam presented by PoorvAchAryALs continue to be in use . It will always have the most important significance. I have reported what I had heard from my sister as she was told by the sannadhi kaimkaryaparALs there . Perhaps the temple authorities can not even tell the difference between cladding and plating or do not want to . Now that you seem to be intent on casting aspersions and questioning the integrity of the effort , I would like you to ask your Religious Dharma Kartha to write to me so that I can check whether any one has committed an apachAram and done some thing imporper. This is the best I can do from this distance.If the gold smith has duped us and pocketed the difference , it would be good to settle that matter once and for all . My address is: Dr.V.Sadagopan Scarborough Manor Scarborough , NY 10510 My telephone number is : 914-762-6690 I am sorry that I have to respond to you this way , but I do not have much of a choice , when you accuse others of lying. Thanks for your efforts, V.Sadagopan . P.S :You could have asked me directly before going around the world with a trumpet and feeling gleeful over your feat .I myself would have liked to find out if any body had done anything to the contrary of what I have believed in .Please send me your comments offline , if you prefer. atr madhavan wrote: > Dear Srivaishnavas, > > I read Sri.Sadagopan's account on the Samarpanai of a thirudhandam to Sri > Emperumanar at Sriperumbudhur on the 12th of Sept 2001 on Bhakthi mailing > list. Now I am in a position to explain the truth of the Thirudhandam > Samarpanam to Swami Sri Emperumanar at Sriperumbudhur. > > The new Thirudhandham is only made of copper and coated with gold and not a > " Multi-layer , Gold sheet clad ThridhaNdam " , as reported. > > I spoke with the Devasthanam authority Sri. Parthasarathy swami (religious > Dharmakartha) and was informed that the new > one (gold coated copper Thirudhandam) has been kept in safe. > > It is also not true to state that " The new ThridhaNdam presented to our > Udayavar will stay permanently now on His hand for years to come. " > It is only the ancient Thirudhandam that still adorns Emperumanar even now. > > Even now if you can visit Sriperumbudhur, you can see our Swami with the > ancient Thirudhandam, that was a samarpanai from our poorvachariyas. It is > better to report only the truth when it is being made public. > > Adiyen Ramanuja Dasan > Thirukotiyur Madhavan > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.