Guest guest Posted October 19, 2002 Report Share Posted October 19, 2002 At 11:52 AM 10/18/2002 +0100, Malolan R Cadambi wrote: >Sri >SrimathE Aatreya RaamanujAya namaha sri: Srimate Srilakshminrisimha Parabrahmane Nama: Srimate Sri Lakshminrisimha Divyapadukasevaka Srivan Satakopa Sri NarayanaYatindra Mahadesikaya nama: >The doubt i have is this: > >If the brahman is defined as satyam, jnAnam and anatham, which are >it's attributes, what is the original swArUpa of the brahman? > >It seems very conflicting at this stage if we are to seperate the >attributes and the brahman itself. This would mean that the brahma >swarUpam is nirvishEsham! This is my understanding of it. Brahmam's dhivyAtma swaroopam is " satyam, jnyanam, anantham, Anandam, and amalatvam " . We must always think (anusandhanam) of brahmam in terms of these " swaroopa nirUpaka " attributes (and many other aspects that are nirUpita swaroopa visheShaNam). Thus, there is no question of taking these qualities away and seeing what remains. If you takes these attributes away you will not have brahmam. -- adiyEn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.