Guest guest Posted October 18, 2002 Report Share Posted October 18, 2002 Sri SrimathE Aatreya RaamanujAya namaha Dear Members, This doubt has been in my mind for quite a while. But resurfaced after I had a debate with my palghat iyer room-mate. I told him that the brahman is different from it's qualities. Here I am not able to understand it in an ontological sense. " Satya jnAnam anantham brahmA " - So declares the upanishad. The doubt i have is this: If the brahman is defined as satyam, jnAnam and anatham, which are it's attributes, what is the original swArUpa of the brahman? It seems very conflicting at this stage if we are to seperate the attributes and the brahman itself. This would mean that the brahma swarUpam is nirvishEsham! This is my understanding of it. I request clarification from members. Regards, Malolan Cadambi Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.