Guest guest Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 , " sarojram18 " <sarojram18 wrote: > > > Chapter20-The tree with roots above and branches below > –[adhyaya15-The Supreme purusha, All pervading Being] > > > > > > Oordhvamoolam aDhahshAkham Svattham prAhuravyayam > > cchasndhAmsi yasya parNAni yastham vedha sa vedhavith(BG15-1) > thanksw for your email jpranams to the srivaishnva koshti. adiyan rangaraja thasan > > > In the adhyaya dealing with kshethra and ldhethrajna, (BG-13) Krishna > has elucidated on the nature of prakrthi, the insentient matter and of > purusha the sentient soul and the connection between the two. Her in > this chapter The Lord is talking about the Supreme Self , Brhaman , > described as `anAdhimath param brahma ,' (BG.13-12),who is all > pervading. ,'sarvam AvrthyathishTathi,' (BG.13-13) > > > > The prakrthi, the cause of bondage of the purusha , the individual > self, is compared to as aSvattha, banyan tree, with its roots above and > branches below, oorDhvamoolam aDhasshAkham. Its leaves are the Vedas, > cchandhAmsi yasya parNAni. He who knows this knows the Vedas. > > > > The above meaning of the sloka has to be explained further to understand > its import. This idea is the reflection of the Upanishadic declaration > `oorDhvamoolo avAkshAkhah Esha aSvatthah sanAthanah,(Kat.up.2-3-1) > this peepul tree has roots above and branches below. This tree is the > samsara, the effect of the bondage of purusha caused by identification > with prakrthi. Since both prakrthi and pusrusha originate from Brahman > their substratum and the original cause of the universe of the sentient > and the insentient, Brahman is the root of the tree and it is said to be > situated above meaning not the physical position but because it is high > above everything being the subtlest and unmanifest. > > > > The tree is said to have branches below as the whole creation is > originated from Brahman and proceeds below, that is away from the > reality, being the effect of karma causing bondage. The branches > represent the whole creation from devas to the lowest forms of life and > also the immovables. Its leaves are said to cchandhAmsi or Vedas. All > karma that are done with an expectation of fruit are enjoined in the > Vedas and they are necessary for the worldly life as the leaves are for > the tree. Hence the Vedas are compared to parNas, leaves. One who > understands this will desist from doing desire motivated karma which > will cause the cycle of births and deaths. Hence it is said that one who > knows this tree, knows the Vedas, meaning that he will understand the > real nature of the Vedas. > > > > aDhaschOrDhvam prasrthAsthasya SAkhAh > > guNa pravrddhA vishaypravAlAh > > aDHascha moolAnyanusanthathAni > > karmAnubanDheeni manushyalOke (BG.15-2) > > > > The branches of the tree extend both above and below, nourished by the > guNas. Their shoots are the sense objects. The secondary roots of the > tree extend downwards resulting in acts which bind men to the world. > > > > The branches which shoot upwards mean the actions of those who elevate > themselves by meritorious deeds and take birth as celestial beings and > those that go downward denote the karmas which take souls to the lower > births into animals etc. > > > > The tree is nourished by the gunas as all the activities are based on > the gunas and the sense objects are termed as the shoots that make the > tree grow. > > > > The secondary roots are the actions done which cause further bondage and > become the roots of further condition of samsara. > > > > Na roopam asya iha thaTHopalabhyathe > > nAntho na chAdhirna cha samprathishTA > > Asvatthamenam suvirooDamoolam > > asangaSasthrENa dhrDEna cchithvA (Bg.15- 3) > > > > > > This tree , says Krishna is not seen at all and hence not understood. > That is why it was said at the outset that one who knows this will > understand the import of the Vedas. The human beings bound by their > karma see them selves as identified with their body only and unaware > that it is the gunas which are responsible for their actions as > explained in the previous chapter. So it is something like seeing only > the branches and not the roots of the tree. > > This Asvattha tree is suvirooDamoolam, very deep rooted and it I not > possible to cut it. A man bound by his karma is like one sitting on the > branch of a tree and hence cutting it is not possible for him. So how to > get free from bondage and samsara? > > > > Krishna gives the answer in the second line of the sloka. > `asangasasthreNa DhrDena cchitthvA', one can only cut off this > tree by the weapon of asanga, detachment. > > > > The shoots of the branches which make the tree grow are the sense > objects which arouse desire and the activities motivated by desire are > due to the gunas. So the root cause of samsara is the desire risen out > of gunas. Hence the axe that cuts the tree is detachment. > > > > Krishna stops the previous sloka with an unfinished sentence, > `cutting the tree with the weapon of detachment,' giving rise to > the question, what next? The answer is given in the next sloka which is > in relevance with the topic of the adhyaya15, the supreme purusha. > > > > Thathah param thath parimArgithavyam > > Yasmin gathA na nivarthanthi bhooyah > > thamEva chAdhyam purusham prapadhye > > yathah pravrtthih prasrthA purANee (BG.15-4) > > > > Then the Supreme reality, attaining which there is no more return to > samsara, is to be sought after. That supreme reality is the Supreme > purusha from whom this beginningless activity has sprung forth because > both purusha and prakrthi have come form Him only. > > > > Who are those who attain this state of release? > > The answer is given in the next sloka. > > nirmAnamohA jithasangadhOshA > > aDhyAthmanithyA vinivrttha kAmAh > > dhvandhvairvimukthAh sukah duhkhasamjne > > gacchanthyamooDAh padham avyayam thath (BG.15- 5) > > > > Devoid of egoism and delusion, overcoming the flaws of attachment, > firmly established in the knowledge of the self, free from desires, > released from the dualities like pleasure and pain, the wise reach the > imperishable state. > > > > Armed with aDhyAtmavidyA, knowledge of the Self, the wise do not > identify themselves with their body, mind and intellect and hence devoid > of ego. Knowing that everything is the interaction between the gunas and > the sense objects they have no attachment because they are free from > desires. As a result of their equanimity they are not moved either by > sorrow or joy being and therefore they have risen above the dualities. > This is the state described as `EshA brAhmee sthithih,' in the > second adhyaya, in which one attains brahmanirvaNa. > > > > This state is further described as the one reaching which there is no > more lapsing back into samsara. Krishna says that neither the Sun nor > the moon shines there! This may make one wonder whether the state of > Brahmanirvana is one of total darkness! Definitely not! The parampadha > is self illumined and its brilliance eclipses that of the Sun and the > Moon and hence they do not shine there. The Upanishad says > > `thameva bhAntham anubhAthi sarvam thasya bhAsA sarvamidham > vibhAthi,' meaning that all shine because of the light of the > Supreme purusha as He is the giver of lustre to all. > > Krishna then proceeds to describe the Supreme purusha in detail. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.