Guest guest Posted February 14, 2004 Report Share Posted February 14, 2004 Dear srEvaishNavites, It is true that bhudhAvathArA is not an incarnation. However, as pointed out, it may be a small act by the Lord Himself without being an avathAram in particular. The following is reference to this in thiru-voi-mozhi " kaLLa vEdathai koNdu pOi puram pukkavArum, kalandhu asurarai bhEdham seidhittu vuyir vuNda upAyangaLum...' 5-10-4. The mention in Edu, irupathi nAlAyirappadi and onbadhAyirappadi -->' bhaudhAvathAra vrudhAntham ennai naliyA ninRadhu engiRAr " It was already mentioned in the earlier messages that; a BuddhAvatharan who came to mislead the asurans with false teachings, this Buddha was not the same Buddha . I think this is right. dhasan vanamamalai padmanabhan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.