Guest guest Posted July 26, 2004 Report Share Posted July 26, 2004 nAdudai mannar deemed possession and ownership Lord krishNA went as an emissary of pANdavA-s who did not have any kingdom at that time. In fact, His mission was to recover the kingdom. In thiru-voi-mozhi nam-AzhwAr mentions Lord krishNA as an emissary of king who had the kingdom. How is it that? As per Lord krshNA's esteemed opinion, the kingdom was theirs and hence, they were deemed as having the kingdom already. the pAsuram runs as follows: " ,..nAdudai mannarkku, dhUthu sel nambikku " 6-6-5; EDu vyAkyAnam is excellent in this regard. Questioning the validity of mentioning that they possess the kingdom -when in fact the whole mission if for that purpose-when in fact dven a drop of land was refused to them- it is mentioned that : " bhagavath abiprAyathAlEa avanai nAdudai mannar engiRAr kANum " The Lord deems pANdavAs as the possession of kingdom and that comes out as AzhwAr-s pAsuram. The opinion of the Lord thus makes what is not as a deemed possession and ownership. Is it not? vanamamalai padmanabhan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.