Guest guest Posted October 22, 2004 Report Share Posted October 22, 2004 sri: Srimathe Ramanujaya Namah SRI PILLAI LOKACHARYA’S INFLUENCE ON ME By Sri Vedaraman Sriraman in Vedic_Magazine lOkAchAryAya guravE krishNapAdaSya sUnavE | samsArabhOgisandashta jIvajIvAtavE nama: || Every individual’s secular and religious views are shaped by the environment in which he/she is raised. Mine were influenced considerably by the fact of having grown up in a Tamil Brahmin family and the political/social upheavals associated with the upsurgance of the regional Dravidian political parties in Tamil Nadu in the 70s and 80s. Typical of someone raised in a Brahmin family, I was used to the performance of the daily sandhyAvandanam (prayer to the sun), chanting of slokas in Sanskrit for various deities, observance of religious festivals such as Sri Rama Navami, Saraswathi Pooja, UpAkarma (beginning of learning of Vedas); all in accordance with Vedic injunctions. On the political/social side, I was bombarded constantly by a political environment and a polity bent upon espousing their anti-vedic and antireligious sentiments in a blatant and often, flagrant display of atheism mixed with personal hatred. Such negative attitudes to a theistic way of life were further amplified by a caste based admissions policy in education that denied opportunity to qualified candidates simply based on their religious affiliation. It is not unusual for those of us who come to the US to get drawn into a materialistic and worldly lifestyle, and my arrival in the US for graduate education, at least during the early years, was marked by an absence of any real interest in religion and/or philosophy. Owing to the Lords uninstigated grace (nirhEthuka krupA), I chanced upon a few ISKCON publications some years ago, an activity that I came upon more as an accident than by intent. A certain degree of mock curiosity (pictures of westerners clad in “panchakachcham” style dhoti, wearing Nike sneakers) caused me to read on. Soon I was thoroughly impressed by the sincerity of the ISKCON devotees and got interested in Vaishnavam. As I read more ISKCON literature, one thing lead to another and I found myself regularly browsing the posts on the Bhakti List started / maintained by Sri Mani Varadarajan. Here I was introduced to a whole new universe of thought and spiritual endeavor. I became familiar with the life and works of Azhvars and Acharyas. I found Visistadvaita’s repudiation of the concepts of nirguNa Brahman and Maya and the upholding of the paratvam (supremacy) of Sriman Narayana thoroughly captivating. To start with, I was comfortable with the vedantic aspects of Sri Vaishnavam due to my upbringing. That this new universe of thought provided a compelling and convincing interpretation of Vedanta provided a firmament of comfort for further spiritual and philosophical investigation. One day I chanced to read an English translation of the aphorisms of Sri Vachana BhUshaNam (SVB) by Swami Pillai LOkAchAriar (PL), considered by many to be the most brilliant acharya in what we know today as Ramanuja darshanam. During my first reading of this book, the concepts of nirhEtuka krupa, acharyAbhimanam (absolute reverence to the acharya and his teachings), and the non consideration of prapatti (surrender) as an upAyam (means) were too esoteric for me to grasp. My sense of this inability, looking back, is that we are too conditioned by the punish-reward system of every day life to grasp these critically insightful concepts. However, I was absolutely mesmerized by the aphorisms that dealt with the notion of caste of a bhAgavatha (devotee). For instance, consider the following sutras from SVB: 194. BhAgavathApachArandhAn anEka vidham (Offences against Bhagavathas are of many kinds) 195. athilE onRu avarkaL pakkal janma niroopaNam (One of these is inquiry about their birth.) 196. ithuthAn archAvathAraththil upAdAnasmruthiyil kATTil krooram (This, indeed, is more cruel than examining, thinking about, the material of which perumAL’s archA tirumEni (idol) is made) 197. aththai mAtru yOni pareekshaiyODu okkumenRu shAstram sollum (It is said in the scriptures that an inquiry about the birth of a devotee is so heinous and repulsive an act of character-less-ness, that it is equivalent to a man inspecting the reproductive organ of his own mother) What struck me very profoundly were both the radical nature of the truth in the message that SVB contained and the clarity with which the same was delivered. I was very thrilled to come across an Indian/Vedic acharya/guru who so explicitly hammered home the message of the irrelevance of a bhagavatha’s caste, gender, economic or physiological/psychological state as a qualification for release/redemption. Sri PL provided a practical means for every sentient being to internalize the fundamental truth that all of us are Sriman Narayana’s children and that we all belong to one ThonDar Kulam (community of servants), unburdened by caste or gender-based distinctions. In a day and age when such remarks could have resulted in excommunication (and as it turned out Sri Azhagiya Manavala Perumal Nayanar (AMP) had to defend Sri PL!!!), Swami PL had such a clear grasp of the universality of the Sri Vaisnavam as bequeathed to us by the Azhvars and Acharyas like Swami Emperumanar, and the extreme courage of conviction, that he gave voice to some revolutionary, and unpopular (with a certain segment of the population) opinions; unpopular then and sadly, in many instances, even now! Today, it is fashionable for political and religious leaders to proclaim that spiritual oneness of all life forms transcend caste and gender based considerations. However, it took a true visionary such as Swami PL to expound the vedic wisdom of Ramanuja darshanam in terms that elevated all of humanity to a state of close proximity to the ultimate God. Since, I have always experienced goose bumps at the mere mention of the two brothers Sri PL and Sri AMP Nayanar, to me, they represent literally the two eyes of our glorious Sri Vaishnava tradition. Sri Vaishnavam is replete with practical applications of the glorious precept of equality for all sentient-beings. Consider the following: • Sri Rama performing funeral rites for Jatayu • Sri Krishna preferring to dine with Sri Vidura even though he had the option of dining with exalted elders such as Drona or Bheeshma. • The episode of ThiruppAN azhvar and LOkasAranga Muni • Our kulapathi (leader of community) Sri Nammazhvar who belonged to the panchama jathi (fifth caste) • Sri Periya Nambi and his attachment to Sri MaranEri Nambi • Swami Ramanuja and his deep devotion to Sri Thirukachchi Nambi However, it is Swami PL, who went to considerable lengths to explicitly expand on this concept and establish its relevance within the Indian social and philosophical framework. Prof. M. R. Sampathkumaran in the January 1988 issue of “Sri Ramanuja vANi” says “Sri Lokacharya carried to their logical conclusions many precepts and practices of Sri Ramanuja regarding such things as prapatti, the value of Nammazhvar’s mystical experiences, and the irrelevance of caste in the scheme of salvation”. It is no exaggeration to assert that if society had taken up on Swami PL’s vision of universality of equality amongst the sentient, some of the castebased upheavals that so dominate India’s political and social landscape may have been obviated. Indeed, I feel Swami PL’s vision for man and society would have rendered irrelevant a number of pseudo-religious and political movements that have corrupted and harmed the Indian polity in no small measure. Thus, after several years of browsing the web and reading books on Vaishnavam, this fortuitous contact with SVB (owing to Lord’s nirhetuka krupa) ended my quest. At last, I feel that I have found my true home. The life and works of Sri PL and Sri AMP Nayanar epitomize and crystallize the essence of Ramanuja darshanam as I understand it. Years ago I used to be very cynical about the prospects for any personal spiritual advancement in the light of the knowledge of my own errant past. Like a shining beacon of light SVB steps in and has the following to offer: 15. purushakAraththukkum upAyaththukkum vaibhavamAvadhu dOshaththaiyum guNa hAniyaiyum pArththu upEkshiyAdhavaLavanRikkE angeekAraththukku avaithannaiyE pachchaiyAkkugai (The greatness of purushakaara (mediator, the role played by Lakshmi) and upaaya (Sriman Narayana) lies in not merely disregarding the jeevAtma’s (soul) defects and lack of merit, but also in making these the very basis for the acceptance of the jeevAtma). 16. iranDum iranDum kulaiyavENumenRirukkil iranDukkumiranDum unDayiRRithAm (If it be said that it is necessary to remove both of these - the defects and lack of merit-, then both become the Lord’s). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.