Guest guest Posted November 29, 2003 Report Share Posted November 29, 2003 SrI: Dear Swamy Desika BhakthAs: Today , we will study the two Paasurams dealing with Swamy Desikan's criticism of the fourth of the Four Mathams associated with Buddhism : VaibhAshikam . Before studying the two Paasurams of Swamy Desikan on this branch of Buddhism , let us summarize the key aspects of VaibhAshikam as presented by U.Ve. Dr.V.N.SeshAdhriyAcchAr Swamy ( Dr.V.N.S Swamy ) and his elder brother , U.Ve. V.N.SrIrAma DesikAcchAr Swamy : " The Four Schools of Buddhism , namely , VaibhAshika , SautrAntika , YogAchAra and Maadhyamika , inspite of many differences in their principles , have some aggrements in their viewpoints : (1) All entities are impermanent , transitory and in a continous state of change (2) apart from the flow of cognitions , there is no soul or aathman as the seat of cognition or consciousness. Unlike the two latter Buddhists (YogAchara and MaadhyAmika) , the VaibhAshika and the SautrAntika hold both mental and physical entities as real and existing . The VaibhAshika contends that all external objects are real and apprehensible by perceptions generated by the sense organs . Space and NirvANa are , according to him , eternal ; matter and mind which is not an entity distinct from the so-called soul or atman , are impermanent and momentary. For the reason that some entities are held as permanent and non-momentary , the VaibhAshika is condemned as a non-buddhist even by his colleagues , who uphold the momentariness of all existing entities. The VaibhAshika is grouped with SautrAntika because both of them maintain the reality of external things. Consequently, they are both called Sarva-asti-vAdhins .The VaibhAshika objects however to the contention of SautrAntika on the point of presentation of a form by the external thing to the mind " . 173) Swamy Desikan's condemnation of VaibhAshikam ******************************************** KaaNkinravan ilai kAtcchiyum kaNDathum uNDu avai tAmm yENN koNDana anRu ivaRRil guNamum nilayum ilai sENN koNDa santhathiyAl sErnthum onRu yena niRkum yenRa kONN koNDa kOLUrai VaibhAtikan kuRai kUruvamE (Meaning ): VaibhAshika's doctrine are: (1) The Jn~AthA , who knows the meaning is false ( poy aavAn) (2) Jn~Anam , and the entity comprehended by the Jn~Anam are real entities(3) That Jn~Anam and the vasthus comprehended by it are limitless(4) Both of them however have no attributes (GuNams) (5) They do not stay permanent and are destroyed in a moment. (6) Vasthus will stay as assemblies of ParamANus ( sub-atomic entiites ). Some weird and distorted inferences are made form this ParamAnu theory of VaibhAshikan . According to him , although the ParamANus are limitless , their assembly makes the entity of similar ParmANus that we call as a Pot or the flame made up of similar ParamANus of fire(microcosms of fire ) . Even if the sparks of flames are similar ParamANus to make the mighty flame , it is confusing to extend the instaneously perishing sarks to become an existign flame. This kind of Vakra (distorted) rguments are criticized heavily by Swamy Desikan in VaibhAshika BangAdhikAram . (174) The contrast between Theory and Reality in VaibhAshikam **************************************************** kumbhiduvAr yAr yenRu tEduhinRAr guNangaLayum tangaLuku kooRuhinRAr tamm padiyai tamarkku urIaitthup-padivikkinRAr tamakku ini mEl VeedenRu sAthikkinRAr tamm pudavai uNal kuritthu nedithu yeNkinRAr santhatikkut-tavam palikkat-tAmm pOhinRAr sempadavar seyhinRa siRRinippaic- chEvahap-paRRudanE nAmm sehtthittOmE (Meaning ): VaibhAshikars accept Jn~Anam and vasthu as real and yet reject guNams (attributes) in them and state their existence is momentary. These doctrines counter their behavior . VaibhAshikAs spend a lot of time and effort to collect sishyAs for the sake of amassing wealth and glory . They proclaim that they possess dispassion (VairAgyam ) and non-violence (ahimsA) . They instruct the sishyAs about their doctrine that they will secure MOksham , the moment their bodies fall down at the end of their life span . They take a lot of trouble to amass wealth and food and worry quite a bit on bodily matters. They state that they perform penance for the upliftment of their sishyAs and family . All of these are inconsistent with their doctrines that all entities are momentary and these entities have no attributes. We (Swamy Desikan ) have refuted all these inconsitencies between the VaibhAshikA's acts and their professed philosophies . The use of the Tamil word in this Paasuram " Sempadavan " has double meanings: (1) Sempadavar means fishermen . Hers the VaibhAshikAs are compared to fishermen , who use their distorted logic to attract the minds of the people to win them over to their doctrines (2) Sem+padavar means one , who wears ochre robes ( KaashAyam). Daasan , Oppiliappan KOil Varadachari Sadagopan SrImate SrI Lakshminrusimha PaadhukA sEvaka SrI Aadhi VaNN SaThakOpa SrI NaarAyaNa YathIndhra MahA DesikAya Nama: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.