Guest guest Posted July 17, 2004 Report Share Posted July 17, 2004 SrI: SrImathE Gopaladesika mahadesikaya namah: Dearest Srivaishnavas, I would not place my desire and snEham on anything else. You would talk like that as long as others are not available. – Once you get that aishwaryam (of other nature), this would go away. AzhwAr responds: kEdilseerva raththanaaykke dumvaraththa yanaran, naadinOdu naattamaayi raththann^aadu naNNilum, veedathaana pOkameythi veeRRiruntha pOthilum, koodumaasai yallathonRu koLvanOku RippilE? (108) In spite of being made available, the greatest golden opportunity of obtaining and getting the faultless, sweetest, never ever fading, never ever diminishing boon of Bhagavad anubhavam , still asked for the perishable fruits by Chathur mukha BrahmA’s Rudran’s worlds namely, Sathyaloka, Kailasam, etc.., and the thousand eyed Devendra’s heaven (swargam); - even if I am granted such worlds OR if I am granted the never ever perishing, mOkshAnubhavam at Parampadham, would I ever groom any other desire in my mind other than mere living and residing with You and You alone at all times and under all circumstances and at all places? BrahmA, Rudra, Indra- et al- are exalted souls- blessed to occupy at such high roles. They are also blessed with great extent of Bhagavad anubhavam at very many times on one side, and also are caught in the trap of being attracted to their own world of pleasures and rulership of their respective lokams. They get enchanted and intoxicated with the desire for power and forget their sEshathvam. They are caught and influenced by their triguNas like other jeevathmas as they are also mere mortal jeevathmas- except that they are exalted ones. Once their time of enjoyment (due to their good past karma) is over, they need to take birth and suffer in other bodies just like other jeevans. If they can taste the Bhagavad anubhavam little which is so near for them and accessible, that (desire) would grow and would yield probably right upto mOkshAnubhavam which is blemishless. Instead they stoop down to the faulty, perishable fruits of rulership of their lokams and be considered (as if equal to You) and perform the creation, destruction roles – but beyond that birth they would fall back to lower births. Hence even if one goes to those lOkams (worlds), and be granted equal to their status, it is still returnable to the samsaaric affliction. There would not be a possibility to be devoted and desire for You always from their worlds and roles. But even in mOkshAnubhavam, where there is no blemish as there is retunring from there, still I would not prefer that. There also, every fraction of second, when one enjoys Your Swaroopa, Roopa, GuNa, viBhuthis, They appear new, magnificent, different and great anubhavams and thus, even there, there exists, Parabhakti, ParajnAna, Paramabhakti- it appears- they say. All that I want paripooraNa Asai(desire) to be with You always at Your feet for ever and ever. I would never ever do anything else other than this babble of longing to be with You. You are NOT something – consumption of which would satisfy someone… Never ever one gets satisfied with Bhagavad anubhavam. [eppozhidhum naaL thingaLaaNdoozhi oozhithoRum appozhudhaikku appozhudhu en ArAamudhamE..says NammAzhwar- Thiruvaymozhi 2-5-4 Exhibiting the same affection and love prevalent in Paramapadha, the Lord appeared instantly equipped with all the accoutrements like Shankha, Chakra and others. NammAzhwAr exclaims that the Lord –one who has under his control all the creations, dissolutions etc., and displays Himself to be different from moment to moment in His beauty, and the AzhwAr experienced Him.] kEdilseer varatthanaam kedum varatthu ayan- aran- Ayan (Brahma), Rudran are referred to here. The first is for BrahmAi i.e.- the boon granted to BharmA was great- to create. While the second- for Rudra- is destruction duty is for Rudran. Also both were given powers [by Sriman Narayana] to grant smaller boons for material benefits to their devotees- which itself is detrimental to their sEshathvam. This verse can be interpreted to describe more on the glory of the desire for the object (Lord) than the greatness of the Object itself (Lord). One may argue then that it is better to simply keep running behind desires and not the fruits at all. AzhwAr had mentioned earlier [varambilAdha pal piRapaaRutthu vandhu nin kazhal]- about ignoring all other worldly wealth and pleasures and only with mOkshAnubhavam I have held on to His Feet. If one understands that, the query as to why does he now reject aishwaryam as well as mOksham would not naturallay arise. He gives the aishwaryam and even mOksham as the example and says: even at mOksham, my desire for You will only be increasing and not be saturated. Indran was separated from BrahmA and Rudran as some Indrans were not given even powers to grant boons at all. Thus AzhwAr sought for and desires for being with Him for ever and ever and thus surrendered and prayed for mOkshaanubhavam is the bottom-line. Thus AzhwAr seeks moksham and desires for; prays to the Lord for the same herein. Thirumazhisai Piraan ThiruvaDigaLE SaraNam Regards Namo Narayana dAsan Vote for the stars of 's next ad campaign! http://advision.webevents.//votelifeengine/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.