Guest guest Posted January 17, 2007 Report Share Posted January 17, 2007 SrI: SrImathE Gopaladesika mahadesikaya nama: Dearest all, Let us continue to enjoy the greatness of our Paramacharya Sri Ramanujamuni. Swami Desika says in the sloka 10 of YathirAja Sathathi: praNAmam lakshmaNa muni prathigrhNaathu maamakam | prasaadhayathi yathsookthim svaadheena pathikaam sruthim || May Sri Ramanuja-muni, accept my humble prostration - he whose works performed the service as the woman- attendant for the Veda- lady (who has captivated the Lord and is His consort), this Veda- lady holding the Lord under her spell, in a dependent manner- so to say. May the Great Acharya Ramanuja acknowledge my saluatations! Sri Ramanuja’s pristine teachings have been the most perfect and accurate interpretations of the Sruthi [Vedas] and so she [surthi] becomes swaadhinapathikaa. Swaadheenapathika means a naayika [heroine] who has restored her Lord within her control. Here since Sri Ramanuja has interpreted the vedic texts rightly and most accurately, Veda maatha is said to have held her Lord within her bounds. [From asmadhAcharyan’s Tamil commentary of Swamy Desikan’s YathirAja Sapthathi – translated into English by Sri CG Balaji Swami] The great treatises of Bhagavad Ramanuja like Sribhashyam, Vedartha Sangraham and others give a clear and faithful explanation to the Upanishats. There are many varieties of Vedic statements. Some of them state the differential nature of Brahman and Jivan by saying that the Brahman and Jivan are distinctly different. While others state the non-differential or the unified nature of Brahman and Jivan by saying that the Brahman and Jivan are one and the same. There are some, which state that Paramatman has no attributes while others state that he is qualified with infinite auspicious attributes. There are some shruti statements, which state that Paramatman stands hidden inside each and every object as its in-dweller. Of these, the Advaitins maintain the stand that the shruti statements stating the attributeless nature of Brahman are the only ones that can be considered as authority. They also maintain that the other statements signifying the qualification of Parabrahman with many auspisicious attributes and also the statements stating the distinct nature of Jivan and Paramatman are nothing but fallacy. The imperial Vedams and the conduct and anushtanams of our ancestors are our guiding lamps and authorities. Strict adherence to this way of conduct is nothing but ‘sanaatana dharmam’. This being the case, it would be improper and against anushtanam and sanatana dharmam to quote that one division of the Vedams depict the truth while the other depicts fallacy. Sri Ramanuja sorts out all these conflicting views using Vedic statements alone. Ramanuja maintains the stand that it is totally absurd to say that, Paramatman is true but everything else apart from that is false. Ramanuja’s philosophy says that Paramatman as well as every other thing is absolutely true. The Vedic statements qouting that Paramatman has attributes intend to say that Paramatman is replete with infinite divine auspicious attributes. At the same time, the statements stating that Paramatman is attributeless intend to say that Paramatman does not have any blemishes and iniquitous qualifications. Similarly, the non-differential statements or the abheda shruti state that Paramatman stands hidden inside every object as its in-dweller and has everything in Himself by having everything as His shariram or body. This way He remains one and only one. Consider the following statement. “Rama wearing a silk robe with a golden necklace, carrying a child in his hand and a flag is coming alone”. Here, apart from Rama, the robe, the necklace, the child, the hand, the flag are all true and do not become false just because the statement says that he is coming alone. The coming of Rama with all these qualifications is what we actually interpret. Since all the faculties of the body function as per the will of the Jeevatman, the body is known as ‘shariram’. Similarly, in all Jeevatmas as well as inanimate (jada) objects, Paramatman stands hidden inside as the in-dweller and the Vedas proclaim the universe as the shariram of Paramatman since everything functions as per his will. This is learnt from the ghataka shruti or the concordant passages of the Vedas that extol Paramatman as the in-dweller of all objects. Moreover the very name Brahman, confirms the existence of many objects as well as Jeevatmans. Brahman means something that is big or enormous. This intends to say that Brahman is one that has boundless splendour with its essential nature (swarupam) and characteristic attributes (kalyana gunams). When we say big or enormous, then is it possible to say so without having something smaller than that? Here Jeevatmans are the smaller ones or the diminutive ones possessing infinitesimal swarupam. The very fact that Brahman is infinitely greater in knowledge and in every other aspect compared to all animate and inanimate objects establishes that the existence of all other objects is definitely true. This is the reason as to why the bheda shruti or differential statements quote the existence of Brahman and Jivan as distinct entities. Abheda shrutis on the other hand quote the Brahman having all animate and inanimate objects as its body or sareeram. Due to the establishment of all the true purports of Vedas by Bhagavad Ramanuja without any mutual contradictions and in a manner acceptable to every one, Swamy Deshikan extols the works of Bhagavad Ramanuja as Sairandhri (royal female attendant) and the shruti texts as Svadhinapatikaa (one who has full domination on her husband). “Svadheenapatika” – The kings in olden days would have many wives. They were known to have existed in eight forms. Amongst all of them one is known as Svadhinapatikaa. She is one who has won over her husband completely and keeps him in her control. The king would always remain in her quarters and see to it that all her needs are properly attended to and would always engage himself in making her happy. He would appoint a female attendant to bedeck and beautify this queen of his. This female attendant is known as Sairandhri. This attendant would give her queen a good bath, apply fragrant oil to her hair, would sort out all the tresses taking care to see that not a single hair would come apart and would then comb her hair beautifully and dress it up with utmost care with beautiful fragrant flowers. She would also bedeck her with precious jewels to the delight of the king. In the same way, here the shruti is the Upanishat nayaki or the queen. Her master or the king is Brahman or Purushottaman. The very word Upanishad means one that stays close to the Brahman. Kannan in His Bhagavad Geetha says that He alone is known through all the Vedas. vEdAksharANi yaavanthi patithAni maneeshibhi: | thAvanthi hari nAmAni keertthithAni na samsaya: || The above verse clearly portrays that every word of the shruti talks only about Paraman. Paraman, the Veda nayakan would always remain with Veda nayaki without any moment to spare. Many preachers and followers of other mathams or beliefs brought disgrace to Vedas by defiling its grace and glory with misinterpretations and went even to the extent of saying that these Vedic statements were not statements of authority and that they were untruth (mithya) and fallacious. A few of the Vedic statements suffered ignoble interpretations. Sri Bhagavad Ramanujas worded gems or Srisooktis that are like the Sairandhri, in order to remove this contemptible falsehood, applied the fragrant oil of Mimamsa-nyaya (rule of exegesis) to these tressed statements of the imperial Vedas and freed it from the locks and dirt of misinterpretations and ignoble renditions. Srimad Ramanuja’s sri-sooktis then upheld the true and genuine nature of veda-vedya Parabrahman Sriman Narayanan along with his rupa, kalyana guna, vaibhavam and the sub-servient Jeevatmans. Also Ramanuja’s sri-sookti or Sairandhri celebrates the Lord along with Vedanayaki and extols the beauty of their divine communion for all of us to take delight in. Swamy Deshikan says “What returns can I offer to Ramanuja, the great sage who has done great service to us by bringing to light making known the Pramana, the Prameya and the Pramatha. Though I am not in a position to offer anything to match his great favour or service, I shall at least bow down at his feet in a reverential prostrate. Let my master Sribhashyakara accept my plead and shower his benevolence on me”. Great verse, isn’t it? let us see what are his works? RamanujAchArya ThiruvaDigaLE SaraNam Regards namo narayana dasan ______________________________\ ____ Don't get soaked. Take a quick peak at the forecast with the Search weather shortcut. http://tools.search./shortcuts/#loc_weather Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.