Guest guest Posted September 8, 2005 Report Share Posted September 8, 2005  Dear Sriman NVS Swamy : "SaThakOpan " is the correct way to write Swamy NammAzhwAr's ThirunAmam . This vyakthi has been using "Sadagopan " because of a childhood habit of avoiding harsh sounding "Th" and "K" . Hence "D" and "G" was used and got into records and Passport . It got stuck I really should use "SaThakOpan " instead of "Sadagopan" . I am teased about knowledgable Sanskrit experts . AdiyEn was born on Panguni Kettai ; As you know , Adhi VaNNSaThakOpa Jeyar was born on PurattAsi Kettai . adiyEn's father gave me therefore the name of late "SaThakOpan " . I was however influenced by Sangeetha VidvAn , Sri V.V.Sadagopan , who was a friend of the family . That is how I got stuck with writing my name in th edefective way as "Sadagopan " even today . Regarding Sanklapam , there are number of ways : dheerga Sankalpam etc . I would not be disspirited . The Bhaavam and approach is more important than the nuances . You are doing a great Kaimkaryam . Any correction as long as they are backed up by auhtoritative sources is welcome to imporve content . No one can claim to be the absolute Master of every thing . Please continue with your kaimkaryams as you do and leave the door open for corrections as you ared oing now. With best Wishes , V.SaThakOpan - nvs dpk1941 ; sgopan ; vaideekam ; Ramanujamission ; ; svknvs Thursday, September 08, 2005 2:35 PM [Vaideekam] Re: [t'venkatam] Fw: Regarding Sama Veda Upakarma on 6th September 2005 Dear Shri Sadagopan Swami, (My Sanskrit Guru Adviced me to write as 'Satakopan') I came to understand a swamin had find fault in the Sankalmpam uploaded in our website. Pandiya King declared his justice without getting the opinion from Kovalan. Like that, the declaration as fault in my website is declared. I take it is a bhagavath sankalpam. But it is my duty to clarify you the fact. The sankalpam given in our site is as follows: "Proshtapathyam hastharukshe, thaishyaam powrnamaasyam karthavya adhyaya uthsarjana karmaangam dheva rushi pithru preethyartham, dheva rushi pithru tharpanam karishye" I had attached the evidence for the above sankalapma which had been given to me by my Guru, and which I am using for the past 15 years. The evidence is in Grantham liphi. You can check it with Grantham known persons. Also I request you to kindly indicate me the mistake in it. God only knows that how can the bad name created on me will disappear?! This is the big problem for the persons who wish to do the public service widely by spending their own time and money. My mother will say like these "Kozhiyum koduththu koralaiyum izhandhaalaam". Sorry for the inconvenience anything I made out of this. Adiyen, Dasan Deevalur N.V.Srinivasan (a) VAsu VAdhyAr - dpk1941 nvs Thursday, September 08, 2005 5:21 PM Fw: [t'venkatam] Fw: Regarding Sama Veda Upakarma on 6th September 2005 Dear Swamin! As desired by devarIr, adiyEn forward the message reg. Sankalpam for Samaveda Upakarma. The mails are self explanatorey. Adiyen dasan, Damal Pathangi Kannan - sgopan Ponnappan ; Sgt ; SG ; Rajeev ; acharya ; Ramanujamission ; Swami ; DS Cc: PNS Friday, August 19, 2005 6:51 PM [t'venkatam] Fw: Regarding Sama Veda Upakarma on 6th September 2005 SrI:Dear AasthikAs :One of the benefits of these e-lists are to learn fromexperts in India about the accuracies in anushtAnam .I am glad to learn that there are additional nuances tothe nirNayam of the day of Saama UpAkarma andam pleased to share with them .My sincere thanks to Dr.P.N.Sridharan of PiLLaipAkkamHH Srimath Azhagiya Singar Vamsam serving as the Hon.Secretary ofthe Sri Matam Schools located at MadhurAnthakam , where futurescholars of our SanAtana dharmam are being trained :http://www.ahobilamutt.org/educationThe learned faculty there are helping us with all these mattrs ofserious interest to us living far away from home . Please see the note below .Thank you Sriman Sridharan Swamy ,V.Sadagopan***************************************************************************************************************************************************************- "Sridharan Pillaipakkam N" <pns"sgopan" <sgopanThursday, August 18, 2005 11:37 PMRE: Regarding Sama Veda Upakarma on 6th September 2005*************************************************************************************> swamin,> The asthika from NJ is correct but there is a clarification further in his > explanation.> For Samagas (Saama Saakha AdhyAyins ) the following pramanAs exist:> 1. hasta nakshatra yuktayam panchamyam amavasyam va paushtapadyam samga: > kuryu:|> 2. poushtapada mase panchamee yukte haste chandoga: (samaga:) kuryu:|> 3. 'poushtapadyam hastam kruheetva' (drahyayana)|> It is clear for them hasta nakshtra is pradanyam. Panchami yukta hasta is > vishesam. some time it may come on other titis (+/- 1).>> My point are these:> - the asthika has left panchami, when there is pramana> - i am not sure the occurance of amavasya along with hasta..i need to > enquire vidwans on this...> - when it will come on dvitia..>> Dasan>> > sgopan [sgopan]> Fri 19-Aug-2005 7:27 AM> Ponnappan; Sgt; Rajeev; DS; Swami; Iowa; > Ramanujamission ; SG; acharya> Cc: MR; VKA> Fw: Regarding Sama Veda Upakarma on 6th September 2005> SrI:>> Dear AasthikAs :>> A Saama Saakha AdhyAyin has invited our attention to> a mistake in the Sankalpam for Saama UpAkarmA made in> http://www.ahobilam.com , which is usually careful. There must> have been an oversight by the Bruhaspathy Swamy , who> is the owner of ahobilam.com . This web site has nothing to do> with srimatam Web site ( http://www.ahobilamutt.org ) .>> Please note the correct Saama UpAkarma Sankalpam below ,> courtesy an aasthikar from NJ . I am glad this Aasthikar caught it> in time (Sep 6 is the date of Saama UpAkarma : Tritiya> Hastham for USA East Coast ) .>> V.Sadagopan>> Forwarded Message :> *************************> > srI:> > Sri Sadagopan,> > dasoham.> > There is an error in the sankalpam details given for Sama Upakarma,> > with Ahobilam.com site. Sama upakarma is performed in bhadrapada sukla> > paksham when Hasta nakshatram is present. This falls on either> > chaturti or Tritiyai or dvitiyai. Presence of hastra nakshatram is> > very important for Sama upakarma. In that we site, the sankalpam is> > given like taishyam paurnamasyam. Paurnami is significant for Yajur> > upakarma. The bhagavathas please note that in observing sama upakarma.> > dasan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.