[Vaideekam] A doubt

June 16, 2006

Respected Swamin Thank you very much for the reply. I am sorry for wrongly indicating 24th as chathurthi. Please pardon me. It is not manavalan vathayr. I do not know whether it would b advisable for me to indicate his name in the widely published mail as he may get offended. Once again thanks a lot. Adiyen, A.Govindakrishnan

Sneak preview the all-new .com. It's not radically different. Just radically better.

June 16, 2006

Namaskarams to Shriman Vasu Vathiar,

As expressed in my previous mail I am extremely grateful for your immediate

response to my mail. In my happiness that you took pains to clear the doubt of

this aged man, I did not notice the last line. I have noted the sarcasm and in

all humility I am duty bound to explain my stand.

My intention was not one of fishing expedition and cross checking the

statements of the vathiars swamis from Chennai. I am in Bangalore and all my

elders are to perform the Srardha ceremony at Chennai. In spite of my telling

the regular Vathiar swamy here about the opinion of Chennai swamys, he was

maintaining his stand. The only alternative for me was either to seek another

Vathiyar Swamy or ask him to do it with all displeasure that I disregard him.

Going for another vathiryar swamy would be an insult to the regular swamy and

hence I thought that I would convince him with tNhe opinion of learned persons.

The opinions of Chennai swamys are all oral and the local vathiyar swamy thinks

that I am arguing for my convenience. Hence I thought that if I could get the

opinion from devareer in this respectable site, it would be all the more easy

for me to convince him. I again repeat that I was not cross-checking the

statements of Chennai swamys or testing the knowledge of

devareer. As an elderly person I humbly feel that such sarcasm would only pour

cold water on genuine truth seekers. Still if devareer feels that the way you

have concluded your mail, I am very sorry.

Srivilliputtur Govindakrishnan Alagar.

***

à®µà®¿à®œà¯à®žà®¾à®ªà®©à®®à¯.

à®‡à®°à¯à®¨à¯à®¤à®¾à®²à¯ à®ªà®¤à®¿à®²à¯

* à®…à®Ÿà®¿à®¯à¯‡à®©à®¿à®Ÿà®®à¯

à®‡à®±à¯à®¤à®¿à®¯à®¾à®•

à®ªà¯‡à®¾à®©à¯à®šà¯†à®¯à¯à®¤à¯

à®…à®©à¯à®ªà¯à®ªà®¿à®¯à®¿à®°à¯à®¨à¯à®¤à®¾à®²à¯

à®•à®¾à®°à®£à®®à¯.

à®‰à®³à¯ˆà®šà¯à®šà®²à¯

à®ªà®°à®¿à®¹à®¾à®°à®®à®¾à®• à®¤à¯‡à®µà®°à¯€à®°à¯

à®¤à®¾à®¸à®©à¯

June 17, 2006

Namaskarams to Shriman Vasu Vathirar, I am extremely grateful for your kind mail. I think I have hurt you. Please pardon me. I will continue to send mail to you whenever me or my family members get doubt. Adiyen, A. Goindakrishnan dasan.

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta.

March 9, 2007

Respected Swamin

My pranams for immediate answer. In the " Pampu panjangam " for avyaya varusham

four timings have been given for Chandragrahanam and 3 timings for

Sooryagrahanam. For chandragraham sparsam, aarambam, madyamam, mudivoo and

moksham. For soorya grahanam aarambam, madyamamam and mudivoo. Hence my doubt

what is the difference between sparsam and aarambam and mudivoo and moksham.

There is a lot of time gap between these.

By ritual I meant snanam for ladies and other pithukarmas for gents. Whether

these timing have any bearing? This was my doubt. Sorry that I was not very

elobarate.

Respectfully,

GJ

***

Sparsam is just nearing the boundary.

Aarambam means started overlaping a small portion.

Whenever the total grahana time is more it will be mentioned.

If the total grahana time is less they may not be mentioned.

Practically the timings are not rigid always.

If ten persons are having only one bath room, any how the tenth man should be

little late?!

Try to obey sastrams conveniently, do not imagine / make it as a 'maha

bhootham'.

nvs

December 20, 2007

Dear Sir,

Similar to the doubt raised by Shriman GA Iyengar, I too have a doubt. My

younger brother's wife passed away on 25 Nov 2007 and the 27th day rites fall on

21st Dec and the 45th day falls on 8th Jan 2008. Our Vathiyar says that the 27th

day rites should not be done on 21st which is a Friday but should be done on

22nd Dec, a Saturday. Also, the 45th day rites should not be done ob 8th Jan

2008 but only on 14th Jan 2008, as the period between 8th and 13th Jan are not

suitable. Is it correct? Can we postpone these 27th and 45th days' rites like he

says? Please clarify.

We belong to Bruhacharanam (Iyer), Srivathsa Gothram, Apasthamba Sutram.

Yours

SA Narayanan

20 Dec 2007

***

25th November the thithi is : Karthikai Krishna Prathamai.

From 25th of November...

6 days in November

21 days in December to meet the 27th day.

The thithi for 2nd Masyam is on 24th December

So we have time upto Sunday 23rd December.

If the elder Kartha's star is not Mrugasirsham

then it is better to fix the Aadhya Oonam (27th Oonam)

on 23rd December will be perfect.

Even though Janma star of kartha on Sunday,

it is better to perform on Sunday than Friday Or Saturday.

Again 4th January is the 41st day and 8th January is 45th day.

On any reason the Thraipakshika oonam should be performed any one of the day in

this duration.

So, it can be done on 9th or 10th January.

No conditions of sastram restricts to do it on these days

as per my limited knowledge.

Please check the counting of days, I have not re checked

did it as a memory sum without using papers or pen.

nvs

>>>***

Its actual sanskrit name is : " Thripakshika oonam "

It should be done on 41 to 45th day including the date of death.

If possible Tuesday, Fridays, Saturdays, Main Karthas janma Nakshathram

avoidable

It can be on any thithi - duration is the main condition

No confusion, Given are 100% perfect.

>>>***

Sign In

[Vaideekam] A doubt

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Guest guest

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation

Support the Ashram

Join Groups

Top Downloads