[Vaideekam] Marriages - transgressing caste, religion and region - and relevance

[Guest guest]

Sir, by pondering, i only meant thinking deeply. Anyway, thank you for your replies, as well as the fact that you would be reading my message in future. I am not wounded, and am still eager to learn more on Vaideekam.I appreciate your strictness.Thanks,Srivathsanmantratecnik <mantratecnik wrote: Dear Mr.Srivathsan, I banned the message only to avoid discussions on this matter stating the reason ther itself. Otherwise I have permission to simply delete your message. To respect the freedom

of posting only I editted your message and stated my opinion. But actually I saved your message in a different location to read again with enough time. Now it is getting late to go to college. I do not wish to wound anybody, but everybody should realise that I am strict in matters. You just go through the starting of your message which shows your pondering .... nvs ( You can ban this post, this email is written for your reading only ) Respected Sir, In that post, i didn't mention anything about not following the Shasthra Sampradayams. I joined this group to know about them as well. all i said was, we don't have to force our practices on people who don' follow them ( which i believe was mentioned in other posts from the same thread ). I did not say that we should all marry recklessly. Maybe you should have read the article once more before jumping to conclusions on the meaning of what I wrote. I encouraged

people to follow our culture. I just told Jyo that my opinion was that we should continue our way and thoughts, and let others be. Besides, he asked for everyone's opinion, not for a strictly edited message board. I gave my opinion. And i think it was rude of you to say " We (the respected members of this Vaideekam group) have no worry about the persons who are willing to have other six type of marriages, but this group is no way useful for them. " especially to me, because here i am trying to learn more about it, ( the reason i joined the group ) and you're accusing me of trying to get people thinking the other way and of believing in marriage against the system. I think I mentioned that we should marry people with the same shasthra sampradayams to keep it alive. I'd certainly do so. Well. It looks like you don't want people with opinions on freedom in this group, and that you assume them to go against

Shastrhas and Sampradhayas. I have opinions, and I believe in freedom of opinion. And I know I wasn't changing or aiming to change the meaning of any text or scripture. I'm not going to quit this group myself ( i like the information and wish to learn ). But i certainly won't be making anymore posts or replies on anything mentioned or asked in the posts because of the 'stable thoughts' in this forum . So, i'm leaving it up to you to either cancel my registration or leave it. I'm sorry if I sound arrogant, I really respect you for having this forum. And i totally appreciate what you're doing. But i'd have expected you to either ban the post or leave it in, in the case of the latter adding the shasthra part of what you have told me in this email. What i didn't expect was a message accusing me of trying to go against the sasthras. Thanks, for your comment though. God Bless,

Srivathsan. mantratecnik <mantratecnik > wrote: Namaste Sir, I have pondered about such marriages as well.... ...................... God bless, Srivathsan. Further postings / discussions reqarding this matter is banned by the moderator to avoid confusions among members. This group will encourrage matters / messages which are helpful to improve the mentality to stick on Sastrams and Sampradayams. Almost all members are joining this group with a comment "Wish to know more about our Sampradayam and Sastram, Vaideekam, Rituals etc." Sri Andal (Gotha) pointed that "Seyyadhana seyyom, Melaiyar Seivanakal ..." so, we have no rights even to think about modifications in Sastrams and sampradayams. So, members who are having difference of opinion on this matter may think about keeping their

membership with this group. Moderator ***Rituals in marriage are having much 'Thathparyams'. For an example: The Sankalpam for kannikadhanam is : "Aavayoho dhashanaam poorveshaam, dhashanaam pareshaam, aathmanshcha, yekavimsathi kula uththaarana dwara nithya niradhisaya aanandha saashvadha brahmalokha avaapthyartham, mahavishnu preethyartham, kannikadhaanaakya mahadhaanam karishye". Which means 'the kannikaanam is releaving all dhoshams of not only the parent of that girl but also ten previous and ten future generation and it gives way to brahma lokham. There are eight type of marriages described in the sashtram itself. But it accepts only the firs two types. If a girl is not given as dhaanam to a boy by their parents with the described rituals, it is a shastra virodha marriage. We (the respected members of this Vaideekam group) have no worry about the persons who

are willing to have other six type of marriages, but this group is no way useful for them. nvs vaideekam , "mantratecnik" <mantratecnik wrote: > > Namaste Sir, > > I have pondered about such marriages as well.... > ...................... > God bless, > > Srivathsan. > > Further postings / discussions reqarding this matter is banned by the moderator to avoid confusions among members. This group will encourrage matters / messages which are helpful to improve the mentality to stick on Sastrams and Sampradayams. > > Almost all members are joining this group with a comment "Wish to know more about our Sampradayam and Sastram, Vaideekam, Rituals etc." > > Sri Andal (Gotha) pointed that "Seyyadhana seyyom, Melaiyar Seivanakal ..." so, we

have no rights even to think about modifications in Sastrams and sampradayams. > > So, members who are having difference of opinion on this matter may think about keeping their membership with this group. > > Moderator > > > > ***Rituals in marriage are having much 'Thathparyams'. > For an example: The Sankalpam for kannikadhanam is : > "Aavayoho dhashanaam poorveshaam, dhashanaam pareshaam, aathmanshcha, yekavimsathi kula uththaarana dwara nithya niradhisaya aanandha saashvadha brahmalokha avaapthyartham, mahavishnu preethyartham, kannikadhaanaakya mahadhaanam karishye". > > Which means 'the kannikaanam is releaving all dhoshams of not only the parent of that girl but also ten previous and ten future generation and it gives way to brahma lokham. > There are eight type of marriages described in the sashtram itself. > But it accepts only

the firs two types. > If a girl is not given as dhaanam to a boy by their parents with the described rituals, it is a shastra virodha marriage. > We (the respected members of this Vaideekam group) have no worry about the persons who are willing to have other six type of marriages, but this group is no way useful for them. > nvs >

On 7 Answers: Real people ask and answer questions on any topic.