Guest guest Posted September 6, 2003 Report Share Posted September 6, 2003 Srimate SrivanSatakopa Sri Vedanta Desika Yatindra Mahadesikaya nama: " Yours Obediently " There are any number of stotras, extolling the Lord's praise. All bhaktas, from the impartial Vedapurusha to the Adikavi Valmiki to the venerated present day Acharyas, have considered it their sacred duty to compose peaens of praise on the Lord, in prosaic or verse form. These are outpourings of uncontrollable devotion, which makes the devotee burst into verse spontaneously, with absolutely no prompting from anyone. There comes a stage in devotion when the bhakta, unable to contain the sublime and exalting experience of bhagavat anubhavam, simply has to find an outlet for his overwhelming attachment, and waxes eloquent in prose or poetry in an effort to share his ecstatical experiences. Though there are innumerable Stotras, there is one particular stuti which is extremely popular, has been touted to be a panacea for all ills physical and spiritual, held out as a sure means for achieving all desires secular and religious and recited the world over by all those who believe in Emperuman, without denominational differences. Such is the popularity of this stotra that even today, when religious teaching and learning have fallen to an unprecedented nadir, competitions are conducted among children to encourage learning and propogation of this beautiful stotra. Admittedly, this stotra is rather long, but is all the more enjoyable for it. We are told that the Lord's auspicious attributes are innumerable, but if we want to find a stotra enumerating as many of them as humanly possible, we have only to turn to this giant among stotras. The Vishnu Sahasranama Stotra is indeed a masterly compendium of the glorious names of the Lord, each of which stands for a particular kalyana guna. If one single tirunama of the Lord, viz., the Govinda nama, could save distressed Droupati from certain humiliation in front of the entire regal court of Hastinapuram, we can imagine what sincere utterance of the thousand and eight names of the Lord, enumerated in the Sahasranama stotra can do for us. " Kalou sankeertaya Kesavam " says the Scripture, laying down that what can be achieved by elaborate Yagyas involving huge expenditure of money, energy and concentration, what is possible of fruition through charity of huge proportions etc. in other Yugas, is possible in this Kali Yuga, through the mere chanting of Emperuman's exalted names. Considered in this light, there appears to be hardly a parallel to the Vishnu Sahasranama stotra in any parameter. This stotra has the added merit of being a part of the elaborate Epic Sri Mahabharata, placing it on par with the other great guidebook of human conduct, the Bhagavat Gita. Often the beauty and popularity of a particular work is judged by the number of commentaries it is able to attract, which is evidence of the undying patronage the work is able to garner, even after the passing away of its author. The large number of commentaries on the Bhagavat Gita and the Brahma Sutras is a case in point. Sri Vishnu Sahasranama Stotra too can boast of numerous elaborations, the principal ones being the ones by Sri Sankaracharya and Sri Parasara Bhattar. Of these, the latter incorporates interesting, enlightening and spiritually moving purports for each of the thousand namas, providing a great and glorious mirror which attempts to capture the various facets of the Lord's auspicious attributes. It is no wonder that it is aptly named " Bhagavat Guna Darpanam " (A mirror of Emperuman's exalted virtues). A perusal of this commentary would afford us not only the true meaning of each of the Lord's names under discussion, but also the distilled essence of the Visishtadvaita Sampradaya, the outpourings of Azhwars and of their commentators and the quintessence of the Lord's message in the Srimad Ramayana and Srimad Bhagavat Gita. So vast is the ambit of Sri Bhattar's coverage in his commentary that we wonder whether it is humanly possible for anyone to assemble such an array of concepts, quotes and comments in a single place. Sri Bhattar's matchless brilliance and devotion are on evidence in every single syllable of his magnum opus. While the other commentaries on the Sahasranama (a reference to Sahasranama automatically means Sri Vishnu Sahasranama, although there are any number of such compilations on other deities too) are no doubt precious and valuable, Sri Bhattar's is indubitably a glittering gem, unmatched in splendour and lustre. It serves as an invaluable enhancement to the Stotra, making it a pleasure of rare proportions to peruse. Though Sri Bhattar's commentary stands head and shoulders above others' in respect of each and every nama of the Sahasranama Stotra, it would be interesting to take up a sample of one name and enjoy the inimitable insights Sri Bhattar provides. " VijitAtmA vidhEyAtmA satkeerti: cchinna samsaya: udeerNa: sarvata: chakshu: aneesa: sAsvata: stthira: " Our research is confined to the second tirunama in the aforesaid couplet, viz., " VidhEyAtmA " . Commentators other than Sri Bhattar have construed a negative vowel " A " ahead of VidhEyAtmA and taken it to read " avidhEyAtmA " , meaning someone who cannot be dictated to by anybody, who is not bound to listen to anyone, one beyond any sort of fetter or binding on his actions. This is indeed a beautiful tirunamam and portrays eloquently the irrepressible nature of the Lord, who is the Supreme Entity, with none to account to and none to tell Him what to do and when. It is He who tells everyone, through Shastras, how they ought to conduct themselves ( " agal gyAlattavar ariya neriyellAm edutthu uraittha nirai gnAnatthu oru moortthi " ). He is not bound by any rules, for He HImself is the maker of the rules. He is verily the uncontrollable wild elephant ( " madha hastinam " ), in whose path none can stand with impunity. None can question His actions, for He is the " nirankusa svatantran " . This appears therefore to be an apt purport of the word " avidhEyAtmA " . The unique thought processes of Sri Bhattar and the influence of Aruliccheyal make him put forward an entirely different, in fact diametrically opposite, definition of the tirunamam. And it also speaks of his fearless attitude, his moral courage in voicing an opinion that is contrary to established and long-standing tenets. And his pedigree, (being the son of the venerated Koorattazhwan, having received tutelage from none other than the great Bhashyakara and his disciple Sri EmbAr and having been the adopted son of Sri Ranganatha Himself) shines through in his interpretation of the word " VidhEyAtmA " . Unlike others, Sri Bhattar takes the tirunamam as it is, without adding or subtracting to it to suit his convenience and arrives at exactly the opposite purport to that advanced by other distinguished commentators. Sri Bhattar takes " VidhEyAtmA " to mean one who is bound by the dictates of others, making the Lord a humble soul indeed. We are astonished at this strange definition-the Lord, and obeying others! How can that be, we ask, for it is indeed contrary to His status as the Supreme Being and militates against the very notion of a Celestial Emperor, the Lord of all He surveys. If the Lord Himself is to be subordinated to somebody else's will, then whom indeed can we consider independent? Though He is the Supreme Being, beyond anybody's command or instruction, the Lord, by His sweet nature, makes Himself subject to the will of others who love Him beyond measure. We must understand that He does this out of His own sweet will and not out of any necessity for the same, marking an important difference with others who have to be obedient out of the compulsions of an avocation or otherwise. There are three classes of people to whose tunes the Lord dances, whatever be His own opinion in the matter. Sri Koorattazhwan says that the Lord is indeed a subordinate soul, a " VidhEyAtmA " , awaiting the approval of His Divine Consort for each and every action of His, whether it be Creation, Protection or Destruction. He fashions His functions upon the likes and dislikes of His beloved PatnI, (expressed not even explicitly but through the expression in Her eyes or a movement of Her brows) carefully eschewing what is not to Her taste. " YasyA: veekshya mukham tat ingita parAdheena: vidhattE akhilam " says Sri Azhwan in his Sristavam, laying down that the Lord always looks to Sri's tirumukham for a signal of approval for all His actions. He is thus a " PatnI parAdhIna: " One more class of people who are able to make the omnipotent Lord dance to their tunes is the arcchakAs, those in charge of His worship at various temples. The Lord is so compliant where this group of people is concerned, that He gets up when they give Him a wake-up call, bathes when He is told to, wears whatever the arcchaka offers Him for the day, be it a priceless and glittering PIthAmbaram or a mere loin cloth, meekly subjects Himself to such adornments and alankAram as the bhattar deems fit, dons only those ornaments offered by the arcchaka, consumes obediently the day's diet, whether it be a sumptuous feast with the nine tastes or mere cooked rice without any seasoning and goes to sleep compliantly when the arcchaka shuts the doors to the Sannidhi. This is why He is said to be an " archaka parAdhIna: " . The third class of persons whom the Lord feels Himself bound to obey are His unflinching devotees, who are able to make Him dance to their tunes. When His bhaktas call upon Him to do something, He obliges with alacrity and willing compliance. The following sloka highlights this trait- " iha gaccha, iha tishtta, idam bhunkshva, iti pranatai: sadA yOgyam vidhAtum yat roopam VidhEyAtmA sa keertita: " " Come here, don't stir out of this place, eat this " etc. are some of the commands He receives from His beloved and caring devotees, with which he complies implicitly. As Sri Krishna, He allowed Himself to be tied to the grindstone by His mother, apparently tearful with fear and self-pity. He waited hand and foot upon His Acharya Santipini, to set an example of a disciple's conduct towards his guru. He obeyed the dictates of Arjuna implicitly as a compliant charioteer, druing the Kurukshetra war. He and His brother stood obediently before Viswamitra during the Ramavatara, with all humility, willing to carry out the errands of the Maharshi ( " kinkarou samupastthitou " ). He ate with as much relish the humble fare of jungle fruits offered by Sri Sabhari, as He accepted the rich feast from Bharadvaja Mahrshi. And His obedience to His parents was indeed legendary, unheard of before or after. When Sri Vidura, in his boundless bliss at the Lord calling on his (Vidura's) humble residence, paying scant attention to what he was doing, offered a bunch of banana skins to the Lord, throwing away the fruits, Sri Krishna accepted the skins and ate them contentedly. To prove the words of a mere infant, He manifested Himself from a stone pillar in the form a magnificent man-lion, unseen or unheard of before. To oblige Indra, another devotee, the Lord begged, (an occupation He had never had to resort to earlier) from Mahabali. In answer to the prayer of deities affected by Ravana, He endured an unprecedented and painful separation from His Consort, who had never forsaken Him for even a second ( " agalakillEn irayum endru alarmEl mangai urai mArba! " ). It is all these and other innumerable instances of His subjecting Himself to the dicatates of His devotees, that have earned Him the sobriquet, " Bhakta parAdhIna: " When the Lord is subject to the whims and fancies of all these people, can we really call Him the Undisputed Master ( " Nirankusa Iswara: " as Sri Nadadur Ammal puts it) and attribute to Him the ultimate in independence? We can, for it is out of His infinite Soulabhyam, overwhelming Mercy and boundless love and affection for us and others that He makes Himself amenable to the dictates of devotees. Simply because the elephant obeys its mahout, it doesn't lose any of its greatness-it remains as powerful, strong and independent as ever and submits to the mahout's directions only out of a love for him. While on others the character of subjection may sit as a stigma, it adds to the greatness of the Lord and makes Him the more venerable for that. He is thus greater as a " VidhEyAtmA " than as a " avidhEyAtmA " Srimate Sri LakshmINrsimha divya paduka sevaka SrivanSatakopa Sri Narayana Yatindra Mahadesikaya nama: Dasan, sadagopan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.