Guest guest Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 6. The nature of the individual self jeevaathmanaH svaroopam dhevamanushyaadhi prakrthi pariNaamviSesha naanaaviDhabhedha rahitham, jnaanaanandhaikaguNam, thasya ethasya karmakrtha dhevaadhibhedhe viDhvasthe svaroopabhedhaH vaachaam agocharaH. svayamvedhyaH jnaanasvaroopam ithi ethaavath eva nirdheSyam. Thath cha sarveshaam aathamnaam samaanam. jeevaathmanaH svaroopam dhevamanushyaadhi prakrthi pariNaamviSesha naanaaviDhabhedha rahitham jnaanaanandhaika guNam, The essential nature of the individual self is devoid of the differences such as deva and manushya, which are only due to the modifications of prakrthi and it is of pure knowledge and bliss. thasya ethasya karmakrtha dhevaadhibheDhe viDhvasthe svaroopabhedhaH vaachaam agocharaH, svasamvedhyaH, `jnaanasvaroopam' ithi ethaavath eva nirdheSyam When the differences due to being deva manushya etc. is destroyed (by knowledge of the Self) the essential nature being different (from everything that could be described by words) it is indescribable but could be cognized by self alone, and can only be defined as being the nature of knowledge. The differences between a deva and a human is cognized by their form, similarly the difference between an animal and a man. But this distinction pertains only to the body assumed due to the respective karma and does not extends to the soul, which experiences the differences because of its identification with body, resulting in ego-centric impulses. The Self is of the nature of knowledge and bliss in which the opposites namely, ignorance and sorrow cannot be present. Hence these qualities experienced by the jeeva in its embodied state is not real. The distinguishing features of jeevas in embodied state is of three kinds. First, the egoistic attachment such as I am a man I am a deva etc. Secondly that of the form as man, deva animal etc., thirdly the difference in knowledge, as the knowledge of a deva is superior to that of man, whose knowledge in turn is higher than that of an animal. But these differences are due to karma and when the karma is destroyed by the knowledge of Brahman, all the differences vanish because the knowledge expands to its utmost state which is described by the Lord in the Gita as samadharsana. `Vidhyaavinaya sampanne braahmaNe gavi hasthini Suni chaiva Svapaake cha pandithah samadharSinah.' The wise see a learned Brahmin who is humble, a cow, an elephant, a dog and a dog-eater equally, because the difference is only external and the Self is the same in all. Hence Ramauja says, thath cha sarveshaam aathmanaam samaanam. The Self which has pure knowledge as its essential nature is the same in all. The limited knowledge in the embodied state is termed as dharmabhoothajnana in visishtadvaita while the knowledge in its natural state of the Self is svaroopajnana. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.