Guest guest Posted January 15, 2008 Report Share Posted January 15, 2008 NOTE: Readers having difficulty in reading the text may need to change their encoding to UTF-8. ----------- srI: SrI upakAra sangraham – 46 --- adikAram – 1 poorva upakAra paramparai (The Foremost Series of Favours) --- SECTION – 5 (11) (27 Favours of the Lord leading to the means for MOKSHAM) ----- In the last sub-section, SwAmi Desikan showed us how the Lord helps a jIva having a very tiny spot of goodness and makes him to take birth with a human body, that too, in a lineage of sAttvik persons. In this birth the jIva gets a body and sense organs of virtuous nature at the time of birth. The Lord does not stop with that. A child who has started his or her life which may extend to a number of decades, even 10 or 12, that is, he or she can live up to 100 or 120 years. But he or she has to be ensured that he or she does not go astray leaving the virtuous path in which the Lord has helped him or her to begin the life-journey. It is a common sight how a person who is in the initial stage of study, is being carried away by different theories which may appear convincing to him, but actually they may without authoritative support. For a sincere person who has developed virtuous qualities by the grace of the Lord, He Himself intervenes through our AchAryAs in order to save the person from going astray. This is another favour done by the Lord, says SwAmi Desikan in this sub-section: (11) cArvAka-bauddha-Arhata-vaishEShika-sAnkhya-pashupatAdi-bahuvida-bAhya-kudruShti-\ matangkaLal kalangkAtapdi paNNinatuvum; The Lord, by His compassion, ensures hat the person who has taken the first step towards Him, does not be carried away by such cleverly launched religions. SwAmi Desikan has named the relevant religions specifically. We shall just see what are they and how our AchAryas have exposed their hollowness. Before going into the detail discussion, we must note a general picture about the concept of religious philosophy. The Indian philosophical systems are categorized into two major divisions – those systems which do not to the authority of the Vedas, and those which have accepted the authority of the Vedas. The first group is mentioned as “bAhya matangkaL”, that is, outside the Vedic tradition. Even among the religious theories based on the authority of the Vedas, there are some which have twisted the Vedic concepts for their own purpose. They are being described by SwAmi Desikan as “kudruShti-matangkaL”. “kudruShti” means, according to the Apte dictionary, “weak sight, an evil eye, sinister eye, an opinion or doctrine opposed to the Vedas, heterodox doctrines”. All these meanings are applicable to such religious theories denoted by SwAmi Desikan by the term, “kudruShti-matangkaL”. The philosophical systems which do not accept the authority of the Vedas are being referred to by SwAmi Desiakn here are: “cArvAka-bauddha-Arhata matangkaL”. Those philosophical systems which are supposed to be based on the Vedas, but unfortunately not on the proper way, referred to by SwAmi as “kudruShti-matangkaL”, are: “vaishEShika-sAnkhya-pashupatA matangkaL”. Generally, the systems which deny the authority of the Vedas, which are the great primary scriptures, are pronounced as nAstika, that is, unorthodox and those which accept the authority of the Vedas are called Astika, orthodox. There is also a view that those systems which believe in the existence after death and in the existence of God are Astika and those which do not believe in the existence of soul or God, are known as nAstika. Here is a brief note on each of these religious theories followed by the arguments against it. This is not intended to despise them but only to explain how they fall outside the basic Vedic concepts and to keep those who are sincerely following the religious concepts based on the correct Vedic tenets. 1) The first one taken up by SwAmi Desikan is cArvAka religious theory: The cArvAka theory is attributed to a philosopher named, cArvAka. It is also called “lOkAyata” system. cArvAka literally means sweet word. It is probably because his was a philosophy of sensualism. It was a simple theory of skepticism. According to this theory, direct perception is alone the authority, neither, inference nor shabda, (Vedas). Whatever known through the sense organs, namely, eyes, ears, nose, tongue and skin are real. Material things (artha) and pleasure (kAmam) are alone the goal of human beings (puruShArta). There is nothing beyond this world. The theories that denounce worldly prosperity and sensual pleasure, such as the nIti (ethical) scriptures, and the kAma shAstras (those advocating sensual pleasures), are only to be followed. Vedas are not an authority. Hence, dharma, puNya, pApa (sin) and God are not at all true. These are being taught only for livelihood. The Ruler of the country is the only God. Everyone’s body is the jIva. The physique is constituted by the elements of earth, water, fire and wind. Question: Then how does the body get the faculty of knowing, that is, consciousness? cArvAka: When these four elements mix together, automatically the body gets ‘Caitanyam’, consciousness. If, for example, the barks and the roots of different plants are powdered, mixed in water and the mixture is boiled, the solution acquires intoxicant nature. Similarly, in the case of the human body which is a mixture of the four elements, it gets the power of knowing, that is, consciousness. The sensual pleasure is the ultimate goal for a human being. When Bharata met SrI rAma in Chitrakoota and urged Him to return to ayOdhya and assume the ruler-ship, those who accompanied him included a sage, JAbAli by name. He tried to persuade SrI rAma to accept the throne by advocating the theory of the nAstikas similar to the cArvAka materialistic theory, in order in arouse in Him the lust for sovereignty. The sage told SrI rAma, “There is nothing beyond this visible universe. Believe in that which appears to the senses and discard that which is outside the ken of your senses.” As He was with a strong conviction opposed to jAbAli’s point of view, SrI rAma gives the sage a very bold reply without hesitation. The Lord sets an example for all of us as how to hold on to our conviction in the concept of righteousness as outlined by the Vedas and the related scriptures taught by our AchAryas. He says: “nirmaryAdastu puruShah pApAcAra samanvitah / mAnam ca labhatE satsu bhinnacAritradarshanah // ” (ayOdhyAkANda, 109-3) (A man who has transgressed the bounds of propriety and is characterized by a sinful conduct, and who is wedded to a moral philosophy different from the established ethical doctrines does not get recognition among the wise.) “kuleenam akuleenam vA veeram puruShamAninam / cAritramEva vyAkhyAti shucim vA yadi vA ashucim //” (ayOdhyAkANda,109-4) (Conduct alone proclaims a man to be well-born or otherwise, gallant or only fancying himself to be gallant, honest or dishonest.) SrI rAma further says, “One following the way of life propounded by you will be ignoble, though appearing to be noble, will be accepted as clean, though devoid of cleanliness, would pass for one endowed with auspicious bodily marks, though lacking in such marks, will appear as possessed of an amiable disposition, though ill-mannered.(109-5) What any sensible man capable of discerning what ought to be done and what ought not to be done, would hold Me in high esteem in the world, knowing me to be vile of conduct and corruptor of the people? Conducting Myself according to the mode of life recommended by you in which My vow of remaining in exile in the forest for fourteen years has to be abandoned, whose way of life shall I follow so that I may attain heaven since you tell me my father was none to Me? By following your advice I will act according to My own inclination, disregarding the authority of the shAstras and following my example, this whole world too is likely to turn licentious; for people follow the same way of life as kings do. Truthfulness alone, which is divorced from cruelty, is the eternal way of life prescribed for kings. Therefore, truthfulness is the soul of a kingdom; the world itself is founded on truth. The seers of Vedic Mantras as well as gods have respected truthfulness alone. Indeed a veracious man in this world attains the highest realm, which knows no decay. People turn away in fear from a man telling lies in the same way as they do from a serpent. Virtue has its culmination in truthfulness; it is also declared to be the root of all. Truth alone is God in the world, piety ever hinges on truth. All have their root in truth; there is no goal higher than truth. Charity, sacrificial performances, as well as offering oblations into the sacred fore, and the austerities actually practiced and the Vedas studied have their foundation on truth. Hence, one should remain devoted to truth.(109-7 to 14) “It has been heard by us that neither gods nor even manes accept the offerings of a man who is not true to his promise, and has thus deviated from the truth and is of irresolute mind. I recognize this virtue in the form of truthfulness as binding on all embodied beings and as the foremost. The burden in the form of matted locks has been made much of by good men; hence, it is welcomed by Me. I shall certainly renounce the duty of a kShtriya which consists mostly of unrighteousness, though attended with an iota of virtue and which is followed by petty, cruel and greedy men and those of sinful deeds. (109-17 to 20). “Indra was able to attain the sovereignty of heaven only after performing a hundred sacrifices. The eminent seers of Vedic Mantras too ascended to the eternal regions, even higher than heaven, after practicing rigorous austerities only.(109 – 29) “The sages speak of truthfulness and piety and valour and compassion for created beings and polite speech and worship of BrAhmanas, gods and unexpected guests as a road to heaven. Scrupulously and duly practicing virtue in all its aspects, having in the first instance correctly understood its meaning through learning from a sage and reached complete unanimity on the point, brAhmaNas seek to attain realms of their choice. I denounce the way you described the action of my father, who picked up as his counselor-priest, you, a staunch unbeliever, who has not only strayed away from the path of righteousness but whose mind is set on a wrong path opposed to the Vedic path; who is moving about in the world with such an ideology, conforming to the doctrine of the atheistic cArvAka, who believes only in the world of senses as has been set forth in your speech.” (109- 31 to33) Thus the Lord prevented the virtuous persons from being diverted by superficial wise theories but in reality against the dharmic tenets. One among such theories is cAravAka doctrine, mentioned by SwAmi Desikan. It may noted that SwAmi Desikan has left us another voluminous work, “Paramata-bhangam” in which he has dealt in detail about this theory of cArvAka. [books Consulted: Shrimad VAlmIki rAmAyaNa -- Text with English translation. Published by Gita Press, Gorakhpur. Spritual Heritage of India, by SwAmi PrabhavAnada. Published by Sri Ramakrishna Math, Mylapore, Chennai.] (To continue) dAsan Anbil S.SrInivAsan -------------- ______________________________\ ____ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search. http://tools.search./newsearch/category.php?category=shopping Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.