To Eat or Not to Eat

[Guest guest]

dear shri padmanabhan,

 

thanks very much for your detailed response.

 

essentially, as for as Emperuman's " ecchil " is concerned, what i have written

and what you have pointed out are essentially the same. i have just indicated,

on the basis of the " Saccharitra Raksha " , the objections raised by some

misguided people to consumption of bhagavat prasaadam and how the same is wrong,

when considered in the light of Pancharaatra texts and Tiruppallaandu. you have

confirmed the same with the aid of Sri Kodai Naachiar's sree sookti.

 

as for Pitru sesham, it is bhagavat prasaadam, but becomes Pitru sesham after

consumption by those officiating in the shraaddham. as to offering of Pitru

Sesham to unconnected persons, there appear to be several opinions on this--we

would do well to follow the practice of our own elders and the guidance of our

Acharyas in the matter.

 

as for Tiruththuzhaai prasaadam given to us at Tirumala, it is perfectly

acceptable. it does not lack Lakshmi sambandham, as you have pointed out. since

Sridevi never leaves the Lord's chest (Agalakillen irayum endru Alarmel Mangai

urai maarba), the Lord never lacks Lakshmi sambandham and as such Tiruttuzhaai

prasaadam at tirumala should be perfectly acceptable to us.

 

thanks and regards, dasan, sadagopan

-

padmanabhan ta

sadagopaniyengar ; ;

; oppiliappan ;

tiruvenkatam ; ramanuja

Cc: Radha Jagannathan ; CHETLUR SRINIVASAN ; Thiruppathy Raguveeradayal ;

Srinivasan

Saturday, November 11, 2006 8:20 AM

Re: To Eat or Not to Eat

 

 

Sri mathye Ramunujaya Namaha:-

 

 

Pranams to all, special thandan to Sri SadagopacharSwamin,

 

Irrespecitve of interpretations, we owe our gratitude to Sri Sadagopachar

Swamin for stimulating our thoughts. In this world of varied diversions, to have

time diverted to these divine topics, is indeed a great service to mankind. This

enough to keep the " fire of quest on " to be passed on to generations down. My

pranams swamin sir.

 

I must confess, I know nothing, even the langauge properly. But curiosity and

half-baked ness sometimes pushes man to state something. This ,urge precisely,is

what is pushing me to say something. my profound apologies for errors and

indulgence , in my notings. It is just to keep the healthy debate going on and

ultimately the Right people to declare the subject closed with their valuable

and punching remarks.

 

Just a few queries :-

 

Nammalavar , " Ulagam Unda Peru Vahya ... " the world itslef is left over of

lord or part of lord superme " Vasudev " ?

Peri alwar , " Vay Ul Vai agam ka inda Mada Nal lar .... " again the world (

seven andams) with the almighty " Kesavan " .

 

His divine daughter, Mahalakshmi Swaroopi " Kothai " , goes one step above the

rest. She envies anybody's intimacy with " Madhavan " . She has dedicated a

" Pathu " in Karpuram Na ru moo " ?

 

The pathu explains everything. But more explicit are the lines :-

 

" ®ßëÛ£Û Ã¾®ËªÛ ¨ß±Û±Êª " .

 

ªÇã§²Ý ®ßëʧªÛ*

 

©²ÝèÐªÛ ÷¦Þ¡Ô²ÝçëÛ * ©ß¤Ý£ £¨Û²Ó뽪

 

®ßëÛ§Ü §×ì٧ܧªÛ ©ßëۨۧߥ ®­Ü­ßëÛ

 

 

÷¦Þ©Ç ¼£ß­Ü­Ó­Ü * ÷­¡°¨Û§ß²Ý ®ßëʧªÛ*

 

 

 

Now the final statement she makes, to whom does Sri Madhavan's " Vai ich Chu

vai " belongs to all, None can eat or consume it alone, So she says "

 

 

 

©§ÔèçªÛ ôëÓì®ìÙ* ½§®ÓªßìÙ ©ßìÙ§ÜÇ õÌ©Ú©*

 

ªÇ®ßëÓ­Ü ¼¡ß¦Þ¥ß±Û ½©ß­Ü* ªß§®²Ý §²Ý ®ßëʧªÛ*

 

¼©ßÇ ô¡ ÷¦Þ©§¿²* É¡ÜÁ ¨× ÷¦Þ¥¡Ü¡ß­Ü*

 

£Ô¾§ëß½ìß ÷²Ý½èÅ* ¼£­Ü®©Ú ¼©Ì¤Ý£¢Ü½¡!

 

 

 

 

 

Note " Po-dhu vaha , generaly or commonly or definitely shared by all.

 

 

 

Says Sir Tho-in-dar Adi Po-di-gal "

 

 

 

 

 

`®ßÒ°ßìÙ ó±Óë­ß¡ß * ®ß²®ß!' ù²Ý©ìÙ ô¡Ô­Ü,*

 

`½§Ò­ß¨Û Ç°© ªß¿­£Û * ¼£²Ý²ÓëßëÛ!' ù²Ý©ìÙ ô¡Ô­Ü,*

 

ø²ªßëÓ²¡°Ü ¼£ëÛËªÛ * ø²¡ßì¡ìÙ¡½°ÍªÛ,*

 

½©ß²¡ªÛ ¼£ëÛ§ ½£¥ªÛ * §Ì®½ì­Ü ɲӧ ª²Ý½±?

 

 

 

 

 

Above all, is it right, if some one said, that what we consider most sacred is

" Sesham "

 

 

 

" Pithru Sesham "

 

 

 

Here again when we offer food to " Bramha-nas during Shardaham " before they

do pari-chay-chanam " we assure them that it is not plain food it is what is

offered to the lord , it said in Sanskrit or tamil depending upon their lieniage

to sampradhaya; the tamil meaning is

 

 

 

 

 

" Swami-ghal Adi-yen en-um ku-de-si-ku eLun-dharu-le........

 

 

 

Perumal , alwar acahariyal amudu sei-dha prasadh-thai .... vediya vat-rai

var-vailthu-kondu... "

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

" Sesha Vastram " etc.

 

 

 

Sorry again, if anything is misleading, I donot want to be a " Hitler's

Minister "

 

 

 

While I know it is "

 

 

 

" Than Nen-jil thot-ri-na-they sol-ie ... i-dhu suth-ah upadesa Var-it-tahi

en-bar " Moorkar avar. "

 

 

 

One intersting point, years (35 years) ago we had a driver at our house. a

staunch Murugan devotee he belonged to a different vargam. He used to utter his

own observations.

 

 

 

Once we were carrying the same Sri Parthasarathy's sakara pongal home in our

car. Huge quantity back,to be distributed to our relatives and friends.

 

 

 

I was taken aback when he said " Padhu Sir, u know what is Prasadam ,

 

 

 

" Pee-r-ar -ku it-tu un-num sa-dham prasadam "

 

 

 

Important , as most of us Know, in thirumalai we cannot take " thiru-thou-lai

even when it is given to us. ( It is not to be given to anyone,however many

archakas give it or push it in the palm of VIPS during sathumari:)

 

 

 

Because it does not have Lakshmi sambandham. That is why all of us rush to

" Panchami Theertham " to get perumal thiru thu lai after it has been offered to

Padmavathi after her thirumanjanam. Our elders used to keep that thulasi for

one whole year , before they replenish the stock the next year. I donot want to

waste your valuable time. However, volumes can be written on the significance

and the graunder of Panchami theertham , by swamin himself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Padmanabha Dasan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

" sadagopaniyengar " <sadagopaniyengar

; ;

oppiliappan ; tiruvenkatam ;

ramanuja

Cc: Radha Jagannathan <radha; CHETLUR SRINIVASAN

<chetlurvas; Thiruppathy Raguveeradayal <rajamragu;

Srinivasan <arunharitha

Tuesday, November 7, 2006 8:59:28 PM

To Eat or Not to Eat

 

 

 

Srimate SrivanSatakopa Sri Vedanta Desika yatindra Mahadesikaya Nama:

 

To Eat or Not to Eat

 

The other day my friend, a true Bhaagavata, brought me some " Prasaadam "

( " Pongal " , to be precise) from the nearby Srinivasan Sannidhi. All of us at home

accepted it with gratitude and consumed it with relish, as it was delightful

fare. Incidentally, have you ever noticed how prasaadams from the temple

" madaippalli " (kitchen) taste somehow more delightful than food cooked at home,

even though we might prepare the latter with the choicest and highest quality

ingredients? For instance, my mother is considered an expert at making

" Sarkkarai Pongal " : however, the same delicacy from Sri Parthasarathy Sannidhi

is somehow more delectable and its taste lingers on the palate for days

together. The Tirupati Laddu is another delicious example-you can never hope to

imitate at home its taste, fragrance and longevity, whatever be the ingredients

you may use. The obvious reason is that anything prepared solely for the Lord at

duly consecrated places of worship and consumed by Him, becomes tastier and

healthier too, ipso facto.

 

However, an acquaintance of mine belonging to a different sect, who was

present at the time the prasaadam was brought home, was horrified at our ready

acceptance and consumption of the same. According to him, there were specific

prohibitions against use of food which had been offered first to the Lord.

Though he couldn't lay his finger on the specific texts which proscribed

consumption of prasaadam, he said he would consult Shivaachaaryas and let me

know. I do not know whom he consulted, but he did come up with a few credible

scriptural texts, which apparently forbade reuse by us of food and other items

offered to Emperuman.

 

The first and foremost argument against consumption of divine prasaadam was

that it represented " left overs " or " ecchil " ( " Ucchisshttam " in Sanskrit), which

we have been taught time and again from childhood to eschew. We might have

bitten from the same mango as our friend during childhood in ignorance, but

after upanayanam especially, the standards of " ecchil " and " theettu " have been

so ingrained in us that we would be horrified to partake of anything that has

already been partly consumed by someone else. However high and mighty the person

who has consumed the food first, the fact remains that the left over is indeed

" ecchil " and as such unfit for consumption by another. Even if the Lord is the

person to whom the food has been offered first, it remains a left over and how

can we even think of its consumption, leave alone relish and revere it? These

were the questions raised by the scriptural texts furnished by my acquaintance.

 

I was puzzled. This had never occurred to me before and with good reason too,

for we have been following from time immemorial the practice of eating only food

offered first to the Lord and it has been a hallowed tradition with Sri

Vaishnavas to consume only Bhagavat Prasaadam. Though I put the vexing question

on the back burner, it continued to trouble me, till I happened to peruse the

" Sat Charitra Raksha " of Swami Desikan. It should have occurred to me much

earlier that whatever be the question, if it dealt with subtle points of

Shastram, then an answer would surely be found in the works of Swami Desikan,

the Master Teacher who left nothing to doubt. The very question which had been

put to me, I found, was dealt with elaborately by the Acharya, with scores of

scriptural texts adduced in support. The work dealt not only with my problem,

but with several other connected issues where doubts could arise in the minds of

the uninformed like me. As the matter occupied the entire third chapter of the

work, I presumed that even in those days there must have been people opposed to

consumption of Bhagavat Prasaadam. And since Swami Desikan had cited portions of

Sri Alavandar's Aagama Praamaanyam and Varadaraja Pandita's Sanmaarga Deepikaa,

the question must indeed have lingered for more than a thousand years.

 

There are indeed some apparent objections in the Dharma Shastras to food first

offered to the Lord being consumed by us. Maharshi Manu, while listing items of

food which are to be avoided, includes food offered first to the

Lord- " anupakrita maamsam cha devaannani haveemshi cha " . Another Smriti tells us

that if one happens to eat food left over after offering to Gods, we should

perform atonement in the form of " Chaandraayanam " - " nirmalyam cha nivedyam cha

bhuktva chaandrayanam charet " . Since there is a general prohibition of food left

over after consumption ( " ecchil " ), it would apply to Lord's left overs too. It

can't be said that just as the left overs of the husband can be consumed by the

wife and those of the father by his children, " ecchil " of the Lord too is

admissible food for us, who are but His children-for, here, the father-child

relationship is indirect, flowing from the fact that the Lord is the root-cause

of all universe and not our direct father. If we were to admit this, then the

left overs of Brahmaa, who is touted to be actual creator of all beings, should

also, by the same token, be acceptable to Sri Vaishnavas.

 

Though Shastras permit consumption of one's father's left over, they extend no

such concession in respect of food consumed by one's mother. And since Shastras

tell us that the Lord, apart from being the Universal Father, is a common mother

too to all of us- " Mata pita bhraata nivaasa: sharanam suhrit " . By this token,

since the Lord is our mother too, His left over should not be consumed by us.

 

Some Paancharatra texts like the Sanatkumara Samhita tell us that such left

overs-not only food, but also flowers and fruits-- of the Lord are to be avoided

with effort-

 

" Niveditam to yat dravyam pushpam phalam athaapi vaa

 

tat Nirmaalyam iti proktam tat prayatnena varjayet "

 

And strict atonement or praayaschittam is prescribed for eating such food

offered to the Lord-that of drinking only milk for a whole month, the whole time

reciting the holy Ashtaakshara mantra, for regaining purity lost due to the

intake of prasaadam-

 

" Nirmaalyam bhakshayitvaa evam ucchishttam agururorapi

 

maasam payovratee bhootvaa ashtaaksharam japan sadaa

 

Brahma koorcha: tato peetvaa shuddhi: bhavati maanava: "

 

" Nirmaalyaani cha na asneeyaat na jighret na cha langhayet "

 

Not only should such food and flowers offered to the Lord not be partaken of,

they should not even be smelt or stepped over.

 

However, against these negative texts, there are a thousand other quotes from

the scripture which categorically lay down that it is only bhagavat prasaadam

that is to be consumed by us. For instance, the Mahopanishad tells us that we

should eat and drink only that food which has been offered to the Lord, smell

only that which He has worn- " Vishnunaa attam asnanti, Vishnu peetam pibanti,

Vishnunaa ghraatam jighranti, Vishnu rasitam rasayanti, tasmat vidvaamso Vishnu

uphritam bhakshayeyu: " . The Lord Himself tells us in the Gita that whatever we

eat or drink should first be dedicated to Him-

 

" Yat karoshi yat asnaasi yat juhoshi dadaasi yat

 

Yat pasyasi Kounteya! Tat kurushva mat arpanam "

 

Every morsel of food unoffered to God that we partake represents a great

morsel of sin that we contract, says the Bhagavat Gita

 

Such is the insistence of Shastras on the prior offering of food to Lord, that

even items of food which have not been offered to the Lord, but which were

received only at the time of the meal, are supposed to be offered to the Lord at

least mentally, before being partaken of by us. The Paarameswara Samhita tells

us that such bhagavat prasadam should not only be consumed as a matter of

course, but is to be partaken of for ridding oneself of all sin-

 

" Tatastu Bhagavat bhuktam praasneeyaat niyata; svayam.

 

Kshayaaya sarva paapaanaam koshtta siddhyayepi cha "

 

Such prasaadam, which is the holiest of holies, is not only to be consumed by

us, but also to be shared with all bhaagavatas and bhaktas and with the entire

family-

 

" Dattam bhaagavata shreshttai: Vishnave prabhavishnave

 

tat pavitram pavitraanaam pavanaanaam cha paavanam

 

daatavyam dvijaateenam bhaktaanaam paavanaaya cha "

 

If the mere touch of the prasaadam purifies us beyond measure and makes us

sacred and eligible for all karmas, should we say anything about eating and

drinking bhagavat prasadam?+

 

" Svayam chaapi tat asneeyat sarva papa visuddhaye

 

Tasya samsparsanat bhojanaat dhaaranaat sadaa

 

Suchi: bhavati Viprendra! Sarva karmasu sammata: "

 

The Paadma Samhita tells us that partaking of bhagavat prasadam, which is the

most sacred of foods, is a must and failure to do so would be sinful and lead to

our down fall. While food offered to the Lord, His Consorts, Garuda, Sudarsana

and other Ayudhas is to be accepted and consumed with eagerness, that offered to

Brahma, Rudra, et al is to be avoided at all cost and not even to be touched-

 

" Brahma Eesaanaadi devaanaam naiva bhojyam niveditam

 

na sprisyam no langhaneeyam chandaadeenaam tathaiva cha

 

Deveenaam tu Sriyaadeenaam Vinata nandasya cha

 

Chakradeenaam Ayudhaanaam vastu yat yat niveditam

 

Bhoktavyam eva sarvesham vipradeenaam asankitam

 

Vishno: niveditam sarvam paavanaanaam cha paavanam

 

Praapanam durlabham bhojyam na tyaajyam syaat kadaachana

 

Bhunjaanaanaam edhate Sree:tyajataam pariheeyate

 

Vrata upavaasa tulitam asanam tasya paavanam "

 

Just as young men covet the " taamboolam " that has been sweetened by the saliva

of their sweet hearts, bhaktas and Rishis long for bhagavat prasadam-

 

" Sesha bhuktim prasamsanti Munyaya: tattva darsina:

 

yuvaana:khalu vaanchanti taamboolam tarunee mukhaat "

 

Eating is akin to a Yagam-it is known as Anuyaagam. And the mantras used in

this yaagam are, " praanaaya svaaha, apaanaaya svaahaa " etc., to the

accompaniment of which food is to be taken with the middle finger, etc.

 

Srimad Ramayanam tells us that Sri Rama took prasaadam offered first to Sriman

Narayana, on the night prior to His coronation-

 

" Mahate daivataaya aajyam juhaava jvalitenale

 

sesham cha havishastasya praasyaat aatmana: priyam

 

dhyaayan Narayanam devam "

 

Though several Pancharatra Samhitas have been quoted above to the effect that

food offered to the Lord is to be partaken of as prasadam, Smritis are clear

that such prasaadam should not be given to those ineligible for it-

 

" Apaatraanaam abhaktaanaam naastikaanaam duraatmanaam

 

mantrapootam cha naivedyam nishiddhanaam cha dadaati ya:

 

siddhopi yaati paatityam aarurukushustu kim puna:

 

Prasaadam is to be preserved with effort from such ineligible people, as also

from dogs, cats, monkeys, birds and rats. In case such prasaadam happens to be

partaken of by such people or animals, one should perform praayaschittam by

reciting the Ashtaaksharam a 108 times with concentration.

 

We are indeed puzzled-there is a host of texts prescribing compulsory

consumption of food offered to the Lord, while there appear to be many others

proscribing the same. Swami Desikan tells us that such apparent dichotomy among

the Smirits can be reconciled, if only we realize that both prescription and

proscription of bhagavat prasaadam are true, but relate to food offered to

different deities. While those offered to the Lord are indeed sacred and are to

be partaken of with eagerness, those offered to other devatas like Brahma and

Rudra are to be avoided at all cost, says the Brahma Puranam-

 

" Vishno: niveditam shuddham munibhi: bhojyam uchyate

 

anyat nivedyam nirmaalyam bhuktvaa chaandraayanam charet

 

Thus, Nirmaalyam/Nivedyam or left over, refers only to fruits, flowers and

food offered to other deities like Rudra and it is to such food that the

scriptural texts advocating avoidance should be attributed, says Swami Desikan.

 

Food or other items set apart for offering to the Lord is known as " Devaannam "

and should not be used by us prior to such offering. If this is done, we attract

sin, which is washed away only by due atonement, says Sri Poushkara Samhita-

 

" Praak saadhitam cha yaagaartham devataanaam prayatnata:

 

Tat samarpana paryantam yaavat devaannam uchyate

 

Anyatha bhakshanam tasya yadi mohaat kritam Dvija!

 

Praayaschitta shatai: cheernai: succhi: bhavati maanava: "

 

Manu's strong advice to avoid Devannam (that which is set apart for offering

to the Lord), indicates that food should not be used by us prior to being

offered to Emperuman. After offering, it becomes prasaadam and it is perfectly

in order for us to partake of the same.

 

Decrying or disregarding such prasaadam, whether it be food offered to the

Lord, sandal paste, flowers, etc., is sure to make us rot in hell, as is pointed

out by Sri Rudra to Skanda, in Ishwara Samhita. The same Samhita tells us

whatever has come off the Lord's divine body-Kumkumam, Chandanam, Tulasi,

flowers, fragrant powder, etc.-are extremely sacred and one who applies the same

to his forehead reaps the fruits of having performed a hundred Ashwamedha

yaagas. This should teach us not to leave kumukumam, Manjal kaappu etc. which we

receive in temples, either smeared on the pillars or on shelves in the temple.

 

" Kumkumam chandanam chaiva karpooram cha anulepanam

 

Vishnu deha paraamrishtam tat vai paavana paavanam "

 

If such is the greatness of food, etc. offered to the Lord, what about water

used to wash His holy feet? Sacred water from the Lord's feet is capable of

washing away all sins and confers merits to be obtained from bathing in all the

holy rivers of the land-

 

" Prithivyaam yaani teertthaani teshu snaanena yat phalam

 

Vishno: paadodakam moordhnaa dhaarayet sarvam aapnuyaat "

 

The Bhaagavata Puranam tells us that Sri Sankara has full realization of the

holiness of water from the Lord's feet, for it is he who bears the Ganga on his

head, the Ganga which originated from the Lord's tiruvadi during

Trivikramaavataaram -

 

" Paadodakasya maahaatmyam jaanaati eva hi Sankara:

 

Vishnu paadodbhavaam Gangaaam shirasa adhaarayat hi sa:

 

Defining a Vaishnava, Bhaagavatam tells us that he is one who has Sriman

Narayana's glorious form etched deep in his heart, the Lord's name on his lips,

food offered to the Lord in his stomach and the water from His feet on his head-

 

" Hridi roopam mukhe naama naivedyam udare Hare:

 

Paadodakam cha nirmaalyam yasya moordhni sa Vaishnava:

 

Sri Paada Teerttham of Bhaagavaataas is as holy as sacred water from the

Lord's feet

 

and is capable of destroying all our sins, says Sri Sounaka-

 

" Bhakta paadachutenaapi mat snaapita jalena vaa

 

nara: paapaat pramuchyeta snaana paanaadi karmabhi: "

 

Those who wear daily, garlands offered first to the Lord, are sure of a berth

in paradise, says Sounaka again-

 

" Maalaam ya: dhaarayet nityam Vaishnaveem bhaktim aashrita:

 

sarva paapa vinirmukta: sa yaati paramaam gatim

 

From this, it appears to follow that when we are offered the Lord's garland at

a sannidhi, we should not remove it from our necks immediately, but should

remember its holiness and the fact that it has had the fortune to adorn the

Lord's chest.

 

All of us eat food which has first been offered to the Lord during

Tiruvaaradhanam. What if some item is served in the middle of breakfast, which

has not been offered to the Lord first? We should, prior to consuming the same,

offer it mentally to the lord, says the Bharadvaaja Samhita. This applies to

anything and everything that we use-flowers, new clothes, jewels, etc-everything

should first be offered to the Lord and then appropriated for our use, as

bhagavat prasaadam. This is what Sri Periazhwar lays down as the principal

attribute of the Lord's devotees-they wear only what the Lord has worn and cast

off, they adorn themselves with flowers and Tulasi which have first had the good

fortune of association with Emperuman's divine body- " Uduttha kalainda nin

peethaka aadai, udutthu kalattha thundu, thoduttha tuzhaai malar soodi

kalaindana soodum it tondarkalom "

 

The sacredness of bhagavat prasaadam can be gauged from the reverence with

which Sri Vishvaksena is held. Though he is the Lord's Prime Minister, he is

popularly known as one who consumes with relish the leftovers of the

Lord- " Seshaasana: " -Tvadeeya bhukta ujjhita sesha bhoginaa " (Sri Alavandar).

 

Swmi Desikan says the practice in some places, especially in Kerala, of not

consuming bhagavat prasaadam, is clearly wrong, in view of the aforesaid.

 

Another question that often troubles us is this--Does the Lord really eat what

we place before Him during Tiruvaaradhanam? Since the quantum or variety of food

that is offered doesn't diminish even a little even after the offering, is it

not evident that the Lord does not partake of the food, with however much

devotion and love it is offered and by however devoted a person? If such be the

case, are we deluding ourselves that we are partaking of food offered to the

Lord, as the Lord doesn't appear to accept the same? This calls into question

the very basis of temple worship, for the huge quantities of food and other

offerings to the Lord would apparently appear to be a waste, as the Lord doesn't

care for them nor has any use for them.

 

Not so, says the Saatvata Samhita. Food consists of two parts-the gross and

subtle. The Lord accepts the subtle portion of the offering, when it is done

with devotion. Thus, though there is no apparent reduction in the quantity of

offering commensurate with the Lord's acceptance thereof, the essence of the

food-Rasam-is indeed consumed by Emperuman-

 

" Kapittasya phalam chaiva yathaa kunjara bhakshitam

 

tasya saaram cha grinheeyaat tathaa havirasam Prabhu:

 

When food is offered to other Devatas, is it proper to offer it first to the

Lord and then to the former? For instance, while performing the annual ceremony

(Pratyaabdhika shraaddham) for one's father, those who are to be propitiated are

the Pitru Devatas. Since the ritual is performed principally for them, should

not food be cooked separately, rather than our offering them the left overs of

the Lord?

 

The Paadma Samhita clearly lays down that only food that has been offered to

the Lord should be submitted to other Devatas, including Pitru devatas-

 

" Vishno: nivedita annena yashtavyam Devataantaram

 

Pitrubhyascha tat deyam taccha aanantyaaya kalpate. "

 

Thus, in Shraaddham as well as in Vaisvadevam, it is food that has been

offered first to the Lord that is to be used.

 

Are you surprised that there is so much behind the prasaadam which we

routinely accept and consume? Yes, indeed, and what I have indicated is only the

barest outline. I would invite readers to have a feast by perusing the original

works of Swami Desikan, each of which is an invaluable gem, capable of

destroying darkness and ignorance with its luster and luminance.

 

Srimate Sri Lakshmi Nrisimha divya paduka sevaka SrivanSatakopa Sri Narayana

Yatindra Mahadesikaya nama:

 

dasan, sadagopan