Guest guest Posted December 2, 2007 Report Share Posted December 2, 2007 The truth is there is no country on the planet does not use fiat currency. I believe that Switzerland was the last hold-out, switching over in 1999 or so.There are benefits to a fiat currency outside of the control it gives to various banking organizations. The ability to create credit for investment can be used for significant economic growth. In 1999, the U.S. dollar was strong, the percentage of debt to government income was decreasing, the U.S. was dominating the tech industry and the government had a surplus, that could have been used to pay down our debt, both internal and external. Instead, George Bush became President. The surplus went away. The U.S. technological advantage went away. The wars, unwieldy and unhelpful boondoggles like Medicare Part D, the movement of foreign nations from the petro-dollar to other reserve currencies for trading oil, our refusal to lead on alternative energy, and a complete lack of regulation of big business (Enron, Worldcom, the sub-prime crises) have led to exploding debt, devaluation of the dollar, and the exacerbation of all the negative potential of a fiat currency. It is not a requirement that a fiat currency destroys the middle class at the expense of the very rich. It is a matter of policy and governance.Libertarians like Ron Paul are very correct about one thing however, The U.S. originally got on the fiat currency from the gold standard under Richard Nixon, because we could not pay our debts from Vietnam. If we did not have unnecessary wars, we would not need as much flexibility with our currency. I would suggest that telling people to " look it up " is not a helpful suggestion. One might read Milton Friedman and his libertarian economic policies, but one could also read 100 books denouncing Milton Friedman. In the world-wide progressive community, his economic policies are referred to as " disaster capitalism " . This is because rather than removing power from the government into the hands of the people, it removes power from the government into the hands of big business. Libertarians believe that the removal of government intrusion will bring about freedom, that you associate with the coming Aquarian Age. Liberals believe that a informed electorate will have a representative body in government that protects the needs of the majority from the influence of the few wealthiest families, and through proper governance and citizen participation, we will have a free nation. Dr. Gurucharn Singh, on the other hand, told me of a city in South Korea which will track all citizens of the city at all times electronically. I find this horrific. He described it as " The Aquarian Age " where no data is hidden. Seems there are a lot of different visions of the utopia that is to come. I am very wary of anyone who claims that their vision is the one true path. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2007 Report Share Posted December 4, 2007 waheguru! thank you Dharam Singh for your response. I am glad to hear another take on these issues. I am, like you, wary of the seemingly inordinate interconnection of information that is on its way. But then, I have nothing to hide. Maybe accepting it is a way to " let go. " I am not sure, but when I consider the push to standardize all food and herbal supplements, my intuition tells me there is something less benign afoot than simple information sharing. I think you are right, however, to have corrected me on the " look it up " thing. There are a lot of negative takes out there. The book (and the video on YouTube) I would recommend is called " The Creature From Jekyll Island. " It is about the creation of the Fed. I am very aware that fiat currency is in place in most nations around the world, and that they were modelled after our own system. I am not of the opinion this is a good thing. The Euro is a great example. The central banks in the individual nations of Europe allowed their own currencies to flounder so that when the Euro was instituted, the debt owned by the banking industry could be paid. There are already meeting being held to create the Amero for North America, and the devaluation of the dollar would only assist in making our transition to said currency more palatable, and even more desirable. Again the banking industry is protected and again, a new currency appears " out of thin air. " I guess the money-out-of-nowhere thing bothers me. In my understanding, the intrinsic value of things doesn't change, only the numbers attached to it. And I don't like the idea that someone is arbitrarily making decisions to devalue the dollar and causing the less wealthy suffer due to the rise in costs. in any case, I appreciate that this forum has opened up for these issues. Prosperity consciousness comes in many forms. Peace, love and light Dev Atma Singh ______________________________\ ____ Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Mail. See how. http://overview.mail./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.