Guest guest Posted October 19, 2008 Report Share Posted October 19, 2008 This post was initially declined by a moderator. In protest I resigned from this group. It has since been decided to let my post stand, and I submit it here. I will be leaving this group for some time after this post, as I feel no need to participate in the level of discourse being shown towards me the last few days, by both participants and a moderator. It is one thing to question a person's facts, another to make aspersions on his character. Below is my original post, ostensibly a response to Krishna Singh: ------- Man alive, I walk away for two days and this is what was going on? Wow. First, your personal attacks are unwarranted, ugly and border on violence. I expect an apology. A disagreement over interpretation is much different than the personal vitriol which you are spewing. Your anger and attitude are unjustified, as are your questions of my integrity or courage. I read this forum only occasionally and now I know why - your small-minded, personally hateful rhetoric is being encouraged by others in a mob mentality. It is sad and pathetic, and of course shows your own internal struggle that has nothing to do with me. I did not cause this anger, this vitriol or these personal attacks - that was you and you alone. And to those who think there is something noble in his angry, personal attacks, shame on you. At worst, I was mistaken, which clear communication could have elicited. Or you could present your own set of understanding in response, and everyone else could have made their own decision. Instead, you revert to the stereotypical tar and pitchfork mentality of a prejudiced small town from some fictional movie. As for the people who have talked to me about Yogi Bhajan and Iraq, you disparage them with the same viciousness that you send to me. That says much more about you than them. At worst, they were wrong. At best, you were cruel. You suggested that I made up the sources. I have submitted to Charles Froman/Amar Atma, the senior moderator, the details of that information and where it came from. I will not release any names publicly on this forum, for reasons which I now think are obvious. However, your implied aspersion was completely incorrect and insulting. Second, claiming that Yogi Bhajan supported the Iraq War is not an aspersion on his character. Many Sikhs, and members of 3HO, are not progressive, are not liberal and supported the Iraq War. Look on- line at the publicly available list of donations to the RNC and DNC in 2000 and 2004, search for Khalsa, and see who shows up. There are 3HO Sikhs that listen to Rush Limbaugh. Your projection that Yogi Bhajan must have believed exactly as you believed on all issues is a poor position to come from. Should all Republican Sikhs who support(ed) the war be angry if it turns out that he did not? Your reasoning is specious and not thought out. I am personally progressive and liberal, for the record. Third, these are dharmic businesses we are discussing, as you vehemently declared. I never suggested otherwise, or that many Sikhs (and many, many more people who were not Sikhs or part of 3HO and who do not practice yoga)built these businesses up and were part of them. Your outrage at an accusation I never made is ill-placed, ill-informed and I would guess filled with your own projection. The truth is that neither you nor almost no one else has any ownership stake in these businesses. So while you feel a personal connection to them,they are YOUR businesses in your heart but not your businesses legally or in terms of decision making. As I understand it, and is public knowledge, the businesses are all controlled ultimately by an organization of five people who have lifetime appointments. I have no judgment or negativity about this setup. When many Sikhs and members of 3HO were laid off the last few years, those were business decisions, and in my opinion, and in the stated opinion of many members of senior management of the business, a push to run a more professional business and a less family focused business. Many of those people had worked for the 3HO businesses their whole lives, and/or made financial and personal sacrifices to stay committed to those businesses, some straight out of high school. My guess is that you know some of them. Again, I have no judgment about these decisions, but they were clearly BUSINESS decisions, not FAMILY decisions. My three year old lives full time at Miri Piri Academy, so that my ex-wife can support the dharma there. I need no reminder that there continue to be personal sacrifices by individuals to serve a larger mission. That does not change the fact that ultimate decision making authority rests in those who balance between financial concerns and dharmic concerns. Where they lie in that balance can be seen by their decisions - I would not deem to judge the totality of their effort. Yogi Bhajan, while alive, was the Chief Management Authority (I believe that was the title) of these businesses, and his word was final in all businesses at all times. Although he took less and less part in them towards the end, his word was still final. These businesses, Akal of course in particular, did millions of dollars in contracting work in support of the Iraq War effort. You could see it displayed on the home page of their website - nothing nefarious or untoward about this statement. This was a conscious decision. It was support of the Iraq War effort. These contracts started while Yogi Bhajan was still alive and CMA, and therefore the final decision maker. This is one piece of my statement that Yogi Bhajan supported the Iraq War - in this real, defined way, he and the dharma did support the Iraq War. This, coupled with what I have been told personally, led to my conclusion. At the very worst - I was wrong. I do not believe that I am wrong, but that is the worst I can be accused of. What I can not be accused of is a personal attack on the dharma or an attempt to disparage Yogi Bhajan. Neither would be remotely true. I await your apology for your personal attacks, Krishna Singh. Your actions weer not brave, nor did they protect anyone's honor - certainly not your own based on the manner in which you approached me. I await the apology of all who decided to release their own frustrations at the world by deciding it was enjoyable to jump on those attacks. As I am leaving this forum for the time being, you can respond to me directly if you actually wish to communicate. Goodbye and good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 The following statement Dharam Singh wrote is not true. He is mistaken. " These businesses, Akal of course in particular, did millions of dollars in contracting work in support of the Iraq War effort. " I have worked in Akal Security since 1981, shortly after its inception, and am actually married to Akal Security. Akal Security's primary contracts and income, since 1987, are derived from the Department of Justice, protecting our federal courthouses across the United States. We work directly under the U.S. Marshals Service. For a short time, we held contracts under the U.S. Army and the U.S. Air Force, and our duties on those contracts were to provide access control at the gates of U.S. Army posts and Air Force installations. We also currently hold a contract protecting the U.S. Embassy in Sierra Leonne. All of our training of security officers, originally developed by Gurutej Singh, is modeled upon Guru Gobind Singh's precepts that " when every peaceful means has failed, it is pious and just to raise the sword. " Guru Gobind Singh taught the path of Miri Piri or to live as a soldier, first live as a saint. We are pacifists, we do not believe in killing or in allowing others to be killed. To achieve this, you have to be a practiced and skilled diplomat, capable of peaceful negotiation to resolve conflict, and trained in the martial arts. Therefore, only when Akal officers achieve training to demonstrate skill and capability in conflict management and peaceful negotiation to resolve of conflict, including the ability to remain calm and neutral and not react with anger under verbal attack, are they then eligible to progress to learn self defense using weapons. We teach our officers that 99.99 percent of the time, we can find peaceful resolution of conflict without the application of the use of force. Our country did not exhaust peaceful means of resolution before our attack of Iraq. Neither Yogi Bhajan or Akal Security as a company or anyone I know in Akal Security supports our action to attack Iraq or made any dollars from that attack. Volumes would be filled with Yogi Bhajan teachings and prayers for peace, not war. He did not support war. Gurumeet Kaur Khalsa Create Inner Peace 505-753-6866 gurumeet www.createinnerpeace.com www.gurumeet.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 Sat Nam, Dharam Singh, Regarding your statement, " I have been told of this support for the war by people I trust, who are in positions of authority in 3HO organizations, exactly as I relayed it. " I find this so curious, Dharam. Despite my disagreement with some of the decisions of those people who now have controlling authority over 3HO, Sikh Dharma, and our business, still, in all of my most intimate conversations, I have never heard this sentiment even remotely intimated. I cannot imagine who these people are, who apparently do not wish to be named, however, I question why they do not openly state what they believe about Yogi Bhajan's views. He was so public, so often under camera, so his views were very well known. He not only publically disavowed war and violence, but taught the most effective ways I have ever learned or heard of in the teachings of every great teacher who has ever lived, as to HOW we could achieve PEACE WITHIN and PEACE IN THE WORLD in our lifetime. To say that he privately told certain people that he really believed in and supported the Iraq war is so incongruous; I cannot fathom the logic in any sense. If he told certain people this privately, which he obviously did not say publicly, do you think there is any chance they could be mistaken or have misunderstood him? And is it so easy for you to believe them over all of his public statements and teachings? Did they give you any evidence whatsoever? Thank you. Gurumeet Kaur Khalsa Create Inner Peace 505-753-6866 gurumeet www.createinnerpeace.com www.gurumeet.net Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2008 Report Share Posted October 20, 2008 You certainly don't need to go away; just because some (some respectfully, some possibly in nasty emails), have disagreed with various portions of what you've said, whether or not you (this is a plural YOU, as in any of us) happen to be wrong once in a while! As YB said, " Your commitment is all you have " . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest rs1 Posted February 19, 2014 Report Share Posted February 19, 2014 I recall reading in the news a comment made by Yogi Bhajan. It was about supporting the US troops headed off to Iraq, at the start of the war. I still haven't found that quote again...anyone have it? It wasn't necessarily a comment about the war itself. but about supporting the troops, as far as i recall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.