Guest guest Posted August 13, 2004 Report Share Posted August 13, 2004 Satyaprem (satyaprem1) wrote: What I do not accept is the abuse of religious titles and the vulgarisation of the title of Samnyas. If a man has the desire to follow monastic life, he has the right to do so. However, he should do this seriously and live sincerely as a Samnyasin. These people, on the contrary, give the title of Swami to people who do not even know what a Swami is, as if it were the title of lawyer or doctor (without studies). If a piece of gold were put in a heap of brass, nobody (except true sages) could tell true from false: real Samnyasins who live a life of renunciation and creeps who show off with their titles just to look superior. It is not possible to remain between good and evil, one can be above good and evil but not in between. In life, we have to choose day by day on which side we want to stay. In the yoga world of today, the defence of principles and values is considered a waste of time. Very few make their voices heard. Tell me just one good reason for associating with such people. How can you say they are doing a good work? From tamas comes tamas. I have lived many years in -------and I know very well one of the "certificated" mandaleswara Swami _______. In __-------, he has a very bad fame. If there's a person who is ages far from Samnyas, it's him, he wants to be called Guru without ever having been a student. He uses the teachings of others to write articles signed with his name. He slanders others to raise himself, he lives on lies and false truths, he has lovers etc. and much more could be said.And then another "certificated" Swami --------'s hallucinating web site: it lists at least 10 -15 normal people who don't even know what Samnyas is,certificated Samnyas.How can we think that these people do well? What dothey do well? How can you think the yoga world couldreally benefit from these minds?I have nothing to earn putting myself in this dispute.But, firstly, as a man and, secondly, as a sadhaka, Iwould feel vile not to express my dissent. Every sastra and every Guru have always expressed the concept of sustaining dharma and this is no question of ego. If we consider that everyone has an ego, well I myself have an ego, so why can't I make my voice heard? It is bewildering. All those who answer me declare they agree with me but nobody does anything. Someone, notwithstanding they agree with me, criticise me because I waste energy for this. For what should I use my energies, for money? For power? For meditation? How can I meditate when my conscience is not at peace for not having defended principles? This is hypocrisy. I hope that true and sincere yogis unite to really make something seriousrise and don't support creeps. Thank you for you attention.Best RegardsSatyaprem -----I have been reciving mails from a person called Satyaprem satyaprem1 who has brought out a few vaild points in the modern yoga world this is a big topic of discussion and i feel that we must think of it a lot Pujya Swamiji was very strong opinioned on the bestowment of sanyasa diksha and to my knowledge Swami Yogananda Giri of the Gitananda Ashram was the only person given sanyasa diksha by him he gave nama diksha to many but sanyasa diksha was another thing we now-a-days have persons who become "sanyasis" and then renounce sanyas again !!! i would be interested to hear what you all think about this phenomenon of "overnight sanyasa" Yogacharya Dr.Ananda Balayogi Bhavanani Chairman : Yoganjali Natyalayam and ICYER 25,2nd Cross,Iyyanar Nagar, Pondicherry-605 013 Tel: 0413 - 2622902 / 0413 -2241561 Website: www.icyer.com www.geocities.com/yognat2001/i_am_here Mail is new and improved - Check it out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 13, 2004 Report Share Posted August 13, 2004 What a beautiful topic that is close to my heart. many times I have felt the compelling urge to walk into the sun renouncing everything that ever was, is and will be. at such times so much peace overwhelms me, I know that in that eternal moment I am sannyas or rather it is me. no title, no words, no external eyes on me or me on them, simply renunciation. then I am called to do my duty immediately resisting I am aware that I am far away from true renunciation. over the years I slowly let go of desires and aversions slowly going deeper into understanding Sannyasi. more and more doing what is here and now. In my study of Sannyasi I study sannyasins and see also so much of what Sri Satyaprem speaks of, then letting it go for, what do I know afterall, I surrender my ideas of what sannyas is. for me I have come to a personal sentiment that of course may change in time, that to take the name and title sannyasin, to vow to do or not to do some thing is initself a contradiction to true renunciation. I know that there are many things that I have wanted and yet they have been taken away from me. If I could have my way I would still be living in "my" penthouse married to "my" beautifull ex-wife, I would "have" children and I would be still driving "my" fancy BMW and earning a quarter Mil a year but that was not meant to be. in fact very appropriatly I litterally broke myself over the laws so I could "have" and keep those things. I had to let go ...no choice. it is this choicelessness that brings us to our true selves and the essence of sannyas. If I was to "take" the title of Swami out of desire for some experience or elimination of some unwanted experience then I might very well be restricting the actual essence of Sanyass. When Swamiji toke Sannyas he renounced, then when Amma came into his life he accepted another aspect of renunciation. he did not restrict the will of God he accepted his Dharma thus maintaining Sannyas. In truth isnt the Grihasta who accepts his Dharma, who renounces his desire for Sannyas, and performs his duty fully and joyfully with present moment awareness a true embodiment of Sannyasi? let us do our Sadhana in the spirit of Seva, let us help others do thier Sadhana as Seva and in so doing embody the essence of Sannyas. Everything changes we should not resist dharma rather we should accept it. if someday you find yourself immersed in God then you have achieved Sannyas but only you, your Guru, and God will know and it will all exist without any title or formal vows. The only vow that we should make is that we can work towards knowing Gods/Gurus will and that we can perform it as best we can. At this stage in my evolution this is what I have come to understand as Sannyas, there is a power and magic to it that seems to .........(no words) everything and nothing, fill and empty, implode and explode. I do look forward to hearing others comments and instincts on this beautiful topic. I have done alot of self study on this topic and while of course I have far to go perhaps my understanding can ignite others and that flame can illuminate "our" way so we may go further. WIth profound interest, yours in the service of Yoga, Gowrishankarananda (GS) "Dr.Ananda Bhavanani" <yognat2001 wrote: Satyaprem (satyaprem1) wrote: What I do not accept is the abuse of religious titles and the vulgarisation of the title of Samnyas. If a man has the desire to follow monastic life, he has the right to do so. However, he should do this seriously and live sincerely as a Samnyasin. These people, on the contrary, give the title of Swami to people who do not even know what a Swami is, as if it were the title of lawyer or doctor (without studies). If a piece of gold were put in a heap of brass, nobody (except true sages) could tell true from false: real Samnyasins who live a life of renunciation and creeps who show off with their titles just to look superior. It is not possible to remain between good and evil, one can be above good and evil but not in between. In life, we have to choose day by day on which side we want to stay. In the yoga world of today, the defence of principles and values is considered a waste of time. Very few make their voices heard. Tell me just one good reason for associating with such people. How can you say they are doing a good work? From tamas comes tamas. I have lived many years in -------and I know very well one of the "certificated" mandaleswara Swami _______. In __-------, he has a very bad fame. If there's a person who is ages far from Samnyas, it's him, he wants to be called Guru without ever having been a student. He uses the teachings of others to write articles signed with his name. He slanders others to raise himself, he lives on lies and false truths, he has lovers etc. and much more could be said.And then another "certificated" Swami --------'s hallucinating web site: it lists at least 10 -15 normal people who don't even know what Samnyas is,certificated Samnyas.How can we think that these people do well? What dothey do well? How can you think the yoga world couldreally benefit from these minds?I have nothing to earn putting myself in this dispute.But, firstly, as a man and, secondly, as a sadhaka, Iwould feel vile not to express my dissent. Every sastra and every Guru have always expressed the concept of sustaining dharma and this is no question of ego. If we consider that everyone has an ego, well I myself have an ego, so why can't I make my voice heard? It is bewildering. All those who answer me declare they agree with me but nobody does anything. Someone, notwithstanding they agree with me, criticise me because I waste energy for this. For what should I use my energies, for money? For power? For meditation? How can I meditate when my conscience is not at peace for not having defended principles? This is hypocrisy. I hope that true and sincere yogis unite to really make something seriousrise and don't support creeps. Thank you for you attention.Best RegardsSatyaprem -----I have been reciving mails from a person called Satyaprem satyaprem1 who has brought out a few vaild points in the modern yoga world this is a big topic of discussion and i feel that we must think of it a lot Pujya Swamiji was very strong opinioned on the bestowment of sanyasa diksha and to my knowledge Swami Yogananda Giri of the Gitananda Ashram was the only person given sanyasa diksha by him he gave nama diksha to many but sanyasa diksha was another thing we now-a-days have persons who become "sanyasis" and then renounce sanyas again !!! i would be interested to hear what you all think about this phenomenon of "overnight sanyasa" Yogacharya Dr.Ananda Balayogi Bhavanani Chairman : Yoganjali Natyalayam and ICYER 25,2nd Cross,Iyyanar Nagar, Pondicherry-605 013 Tel: 0413 - 2622902 / 0413 -2241561 Website: www.icyer.com www.geocities.com/yognat2001/i_am_here Mail is new and improved - Check it out! "Health and Happiness are your birthright, claim them through Rishiculture Ashtanga Yoga" -Yogamaharishi Dr Swami Gitananda Giri YOGACHARYA GOWRISHANKARANANDA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Dear members. Should i use the word-spiritual corruption of what you are saying. but spiritual consciousness as such can not be corrupted and is eternal, infinite, truth, bliss and so on. and it it can not be corrupted then why this vulgarsiation. i wounder if i say darkness is not oppsite of light but absence of light. similarly, so called vulgarisation of Sannyasa is absence of awakening of spiritual consciousness and manifesttaion of that consciousness in an individual. i as person guided bymind would call that person in ingorance and woill continue my sadhana. there is another way is to curse, crticise ..........of that person, this would bring in conflicts and confusions in my mind and this i never want to do as i am treading the path of spirtuality. there are other points also to be considered here with refrernce to spiirtuality and world the simple explanation about what you wrote is that we should condemn , reject and refuse those people who are engaged in these so called pseudo spiritualism. but i do not get any spiritual heights or raise my consciousness. there is philosophical explanation is that we must condemn , reject and reject these movements , these people etc . well, purley an idealist view. but being an idealist view , i can not prorgess as all philosophy remains at mental level and spirituality is beyond there is another view i would rather call it , spirtual explanataion i wounder if God look at those people , what he would say or what satnd he would take God is eternal love, knolwdge, truth , bliss infnite. because he is infnite as God is infnite , created everything, so he is also within these people. God hie himself of infnity, eternity and knolwdge, manifest as vulgarisation .. if God never say anything, who are we to say. but that does not mean glorification. it means i am in process of becming divine, so i accept it as mental aberration and mental view but spritual view absorbs one and all, good and bad, i progress spiritually Gj >Satyaprem (satyaprem1) wrote: >What I do not accept is the abuse of religious titles and the >vulgarisation of the title of Samnyas. If a man has the desire to follow >monastic life, he has the right to do so. However, he should do this >seriously and live sincerely as a Samnyasin. >These people, on the contrary, give the title of Swami to people who do not >even know what a Swami is, as if it were the title of lawyer or doctor >(without studies). If a piece of gold were put in a heap of brass, nobody >(except true sages) could tell true from false: real Samnyasins who live a >life of renunciation and creeps who show off with their titles just to look >superior. It is not possible to remain between good and evil, one can be >above good and evil but not in between. > In life, we have to choose day by day on which side we want to stay. In >the yoga world of today, the defence of principles and values is considered >a waste of time. Very few make their voices heard. Tell me just one good >reason for associating with such people. How can you say they are doing a >good work? From tamas comes tamas. > >I have lived many years in -------and I know very well one of the > " certificated " mandaleswara Swami _______. In __-------, he has a very bad >fame. If there's a person who is ages far from Samnyas, it's him, he wants >to be called Guru without ever having been a student. He uses the teachings >of others to write articles signed with his name. He slanders others to >raise himself, he lives on lies and false truths, he has lovers etc. and >much more could be said. >And then another " certificated " Swami --------'s hallucinating web site: it >lists at least 10 -15 normal people who don't even know what Samnyas >is,certificated Samnyas. >How can we think that these people do well? What dothey do well? How can >you think the yoga world couldreally benefit from these minds? >I have nothing to earn putting myself in this dispute.But, firstly, as a >man and, secondly, as a sadhaka, Iwould feel vile not to express my >dissent. Every sastra and every Guru have always expressed the concept of >sustaining dharma and this is no question of ego. If we consider that >everyone has an ego, well I myself have an ego, so why can't I make my >voice heard? It is bewildering. All those who answer me declare they agree >with me but nobody does anything. Someone, notwithstanding they agree with >me, criticise me because I waste energy for this. For what should I use my >energies, for money? For power? For meditation? How can I meditate when my >conscience is not at peace for not having defended principles? This is >hypocrisy. I hope that true and sincere yogis unite to really make >something serious >rise and don't support creeps. Thank you for you attention. >Best Regards >Satyaprem > > >----- >I have been reciving mails from a person called Satyaprem >satyaprem1 who has brought out a few vaild points in the modern >yoga world > > >this is a big topic of discussion and i feel that we must think of it a lot > >Pujya Swamiji was very strong opinioned on the bestowment of sanyasa diksha >and to my knowledge Swami Yogananda Giri of the Gitananda Ashram was the >only person given sanyasa diksha by him > >he gave nama diksha to many but sanyasa diksha was another thing > >we now-a-days have persons who become " sanyasis " and then renounce sanyas >again !!! > >i would be interested to hear what you all think about this phenomenon of > " overnight sanyasa " > > > > >Yogacharya >Dr.Ananda Balayogi Bhavanani >Chairman : Yoganjali Natyalayam and ICYER >25,2nd Cross,Iyyanar Nagar, Pondicherry-605 013 >Tel: 0413 - 2622902 / 0413 -2241561 >Website: www.icyer.com >www.geocities.com/yognat2001/i_am_here > > > > > > > > > Mail is new and improved - Check it out! _______________ Post Classifieds on MSN classifieds. http://go.msnserver.com/IN/44045.asp Buy and Sell on MSN Classifieds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 There is big confusion about Yoga and Sannyasa. Sannyasa is method and a practice and yoga science of which Sannyasa is one organ by which one can reach to ultimate. Sannyasa is external and internal. The external is more demanding towards social consciousness but transcending social consciousness can alone take us to journey to the ultimate. It appears that society instituted Sannyasa for promotion of a tradition, religion and scriptures. But internal Sannyasa is more a transformation, an awakening and realisation that social consciousness as such a barrier to realisation of the ultimate. What society offers comes out of ignorance and what yoga offers comes out of The Absolute and it is Absolute knowledge. What comes out of ignorance is required to either left as done by Sankaracharya or transformed as done by Vivekananda and even some Bhakti school of yoga. There are others who ignored this and entered into trance known as Samadhi. The question is what I am going to do as Sadhaka of yoga, as an ardent practitioner of yoga in order to realise what the ultimate is? It is always better to follow according to one’s aspiration and that is realisation, peace, harmony within. I happened to visit Rishikesh every week from Delhi in search of spiritual master. I met many masters during the last 25 years. But I met a master who claimed to offer me realisation and guided few practices which I knew beforehand. These were Hatha Yoga practices and could not take one to higher consciousness. I was annoyed and angry over this master who is still alive and had very big Ashram there and large follwing. The incident dates back in 1989, I started crying over him and caught his loin clothes. He asked me,” I will go sin as I have humiliated the master” I was not controlled and said to him,” here is your initiation, here are articles of intiation.” I vivdly remember I humiliated him the most and left the place and went to near by ashram. I knew the master did not know anything, I also knew that this man claim himself as Sannyasi always make people fool. I had a habit of contemplation -Reflection and Awareness of the event as it is. During the night id started contemplation over the event and started abusing myself like the way I am writing below. “If you want to buy a shirt, you go to market and to many shops in search of a shirt. If a shopkeeper does not have a shirt you want to buy, you never fight with him and ask him as why he is not keeping the shirt, and you want to buy. Then why I fought with that Sannyasi who claimed to be a master. I have to do nothing with what he has or does not have but keep my eyes on what aspire for, what I want and if a person , event do not bring it, let me change the event or change the master.” This lesson of humility even towards taught me a great lesson, and I am the last person to disclose to anyone what exactly I know but always pay respect to all irrespective of one having knowledge or not.” What I am looking for is more important than how the world is. I know world is not going to change for me, let me change for the sake of yoga. Gj > " Dr.Ananda Bhavanani " <yognat2001 > > > Sanyas and the modern yoga world >Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:23:12 -0700 (PDT) > >Satyaprem (satyaprem1) wrote: >What I do not accept is the abuse of religious titles and the >vulgarisation of the title of Samnyas. If a man has the desire to follow >monastic life, he has the right to do so. However, he should do this >seriously and live sincerely as a Samnyasin. >These people, on the contrary, give the title of Swami to people who do not >even know what a Swami is, as if it were the title of lawyer or doctor >(without studies). If a piece of gold were put in a heap of brass, nobody >(except true sages) could tell true from false: real Samnyasins who live a >life of renunciation and creeps who show off with their titles just to look >superior. It is not possible to remain between good and evil, one can be >above good and evil but not in between. > In life, we have to choose day by day on which side we want to stay. In >the yoga world of today, the defence of principles and values is considered >a waste of time. Very few make their voices heard. Tell me just one good >reason for associating with such people. How can you say they are doing a >good work? From tamas comes tamas. > >I have lived many years in -------and I know very well one of the > " certificated " mandaleswara Swami _______. In __-------, he has a very bad >fame. If there's a person who is ages far from Samnyas, it's him, he wants >to be called Guru without ever having been a student. He uses the teachings >of others to write articles signed with his name. He slanders others to >raise himself, he lives on lies and false truths, he has lovers etc. and >much more could be said. >And then another " certificated " Swami --------'s hallucinating web site: it >lists at least 10 -15 normal people who don't even know what Samnyas >is,certificated Samnyas. >How can we think that these people do well? What dothey do well? How can >you think the yoga world couldreally benefit from these minds? >I have nothing to earn putting myself in this dispute.But, firstly, as a >man and, secondly, as a sadhaka, Iwould feel vile not to express my >dissent. Every sastra and every Guru have always expressed the concept of >sustaining dharma and this is no question of ego. If we consider that >everyone has an ego, well I myself have an ego, so why can't I make my >voice heard? It is bewildering. All those who answer me declare they agree >with me but nobody does anything. Someone, notwithstanding they agree with >me, criticise me because I waste energy for this. For what should I use my >energies, for money? For power? For meditation? How can I meditate when my >conscience is not at peace for not having defended principles? This is >hypocrisy. I hope that true and sincere yogis unite to really make >something serious >rise and don't support creeps. Thank you for you attention. >Best Regards >Satyaprem > > >----- >I have been reciving mails from a person called Satyaprem >satyaprem1 who has brought out a few vaild points in the modern >yoga world > > >this is a big topic of discussion and i feel that we must think of it a lot > >Pujya Swamiji was very strong opinioned on the bestowment of sanyasa diksha >and to my knowledge Swami Yogananda Giri of the Gitananda Ashram was the >only person given sanyasa diksha by him > >he gave nama diksha to many but sanyasa diksha was another thing > >we now-a-days have persons who become " sanyasis " and then renounce sanyas >again !!! > >i would be interested to hear what you all think about this phenomenon of > " overnight sanyasa " > > > > >Yogacharya >Dr.Ananda Balayogi Bhavanani >Chairman : Yoganjali Natyalayam and ICYER >25,2nd Cross,Iyyanar Nagar, Pondicherry-605 013 >Tel: 0413 - 2622902 / 0413 -2241561 >Website: www.icyer.com >www.geocities.com/yognat2001/i_am_here > > > > > > > > > Mail is new and improved - Check it out! _______________ Get FREE unlimited Citibank ATM transactions! http://go.msnserver.com/IN/54174.asp Discover real-value banking here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 it is wonderful to read the thoughtful and thought provoking comments from Girish Jha, a favourite "son" of Pujya Swamiji whenever in Delhi i hope that all others on the group are also awake and reading this inspiring stuff from some of the best minds in the business anandaGirish Jha <maakali wrote: There is big confusion about Yoga and Sannyasa. Sannyasa is method and a practice and yoga science of which Sannyasa is one organ by which one can reach to ultimate.Sannyasa is external and internal.The external is more demanding towards social consciousness but transcending social consciousness can alone take us to journey to the ultimate. It appears that society instituted Sannyasa for promotion of a tradition, religion and scriptures. But internal Sannyasa is more a transformation, an awakening and realisation that social consciousness as such a barrier to realisation of the ultimate.What society offers comes out of ignorance and what yoga offers comes out of The Absolute and it is Absolute knowledge.What comes out of ignorance is required to either left as done by Sankaracharya or transformed as done by Vivekananda and even some Bhakti school of yoga. There are others who ignored this and entered into trance known as Samadhi.The question is what I am going to do as Sadhaka of yoga, as an ardent practitioner of yoga in order to realise what the ultimate is?It is always better to follow according to one’s aspiration and that is realisation, peace, harmony within. I happened to visit Rishikesh every week from Delhi in search of spiritual master. I met many masters during the last 25 years. But I met a master who claimed to offer me realisation and guided few practices which I knew beforehand. These were Hatha Yoga practices and could not take one to higher consciousness. I was annoyed and angry over this master who is still alive and had very big Ashram there and large follwing. The incident dates back in 1989, I started crying over him and caught his loin clothes. He asked me,” I will go sin as I have humiliated the master” I was not controlled and said to him,” here is your initiation, here are articles of intiation.” I vivdly remember I humiliated him the most and left the place and went to near by ashram. I knew the master did not know anything, I also knew that this man claim himself as Sannyasi always make people fool.I had a habit of contemplation -Reflection and Awareness of the event as it is. During the night id started contemplation over the event and started abusing myself like the way I am writing below.“If you want to buy a shirt, you go to market and to many shops in search of a shirt. If a shopkeeper does not have a shirt you want to buy, you never fight with him and ask him as why he is not keeping the shirt, and you want to buy. Then why I fought with that Sannyasi who claimed to be a master. I have to do nothing with what he has or does not have but keep my eyes on what aspire for, what I want and if a person , event do not bring it, let me change the event or change the master.” This lesson of humility even towards taught me a great lesson, and I am the last person to disclose to anyone what exactly I know but always pay respect to all irrespective of one having knowledge or not.”What I am looking for is more important than how the world is. I know world is not going to change for me, let me change for the sake of yoga.Gj>"Dr.Ananda Bhavanani" > > > Sanyas and the modern yoga world>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:23:12 -0700 (PDT)>>Satyaprem (satyaprem1) wrote:>What I do not accept is the abuse of religious titles and the >vulgarisation of the title of Samnyas. If a man has the desire to follow >monastic life, he has the right to do so. However, he should do this >seriously and live sincerely as a Samnyasin.>These people, on the contrary, give the title of Swami to people who do not >even know what a Swami is, as if it were the title of lawyer or doctor >(without studies). If a piece of gold were put in a heap of brass, nobody >(except true sages) could tell true from false: real Samnyasins who live a >life of renunciation and creeps who show off with their titles just to look >superior. It is not possible to remain between good and evil, one can be >above good and evil but not in between.> In life, we have to choose day by day on which side we want to stay. In >the yoga world of today, the defence of principles and values is considered >a waste of time. Very few make their voices heard. Tell me just one good >reason for associating with such people. How can you say they are doing a >good work? From tamas comes tamas.>>I have lived many years in -------and I know very well one of the >"certificated" mandaleswara Swami _______. In __-------, he has a very bad >fame. If there's a person who is ages far from Samnyas, it's him, he wants >to be called Guru without ever having been a student. He uses the teachings >of others to write articles signed with his name. He slanders others to >raise himself, he lives on lies and false truths, he has lovers etc. and >much more could be said.>And then another "certificated" Swami --------'s hallucinating web site: it >lists at least 10 -15 normal people who don't even know what Samnyas >is,certificated Samnyas.>How can we think that these people do well? What dothey do well? How can >you think the yoga world couldreally benefit from these minds?>I have nothing to earn putting myself in this dispute.But, firstly, as a >man and, secondly, as a sadhaka, Iwould feel vile not to express my >dissent. Every sastra and every Guru have always expressed the concept of >sustaining dharma and this is no question of ego. If we consider that >everyone has an ego, well I myself have an ego, so why can't I make my >voice heard? It is bewildering. All those who answer me declare they agree >with me but nobody does anything. Someone, notwithstanding they agree with >me, criticise me because I waste energy for this. For what should I use my >energies, for money? For power? For meditation? How can I meditate when my >conscience is not at peace for not having defended principles? This is >hypocrisy. I hope that true and sincere yogis unite to really make >something serious>rise and don't support creeps. Thank you for you attention.>Best Regards>Satyaprem>>>----->I have been reciving mails from a person called Satyaprem >satyaprem1 who has brought out a few vaild points in the modern >yoga world>>>this is a big topic of discussion and i feel that we must think of it a lot>>Pujya Swamiji was very strong opinioned on the bestowment of sanyasa diksha >and to my knowledge Swami Yogananda Giri of the Gitananda Ashram was the >only person given sanyasa diksha by him>>he gave nama diksha to many but sanyasa diksha was another thing>>we now-a-days have persons who become "sanyasis" and then renounce sanyas >again !!!>>i would be interested to hear what you all think about this phenomenon of >"overnight sanyasa">>>>>Yogacharya>Dr.Ananda Balayogi Bhavanani>Chairman : Yoganjali Natyalayam and ICYER>25,2nd Cross,Iyyanar Nagar, Pondicherry-605 013>Tel: 0413 - 2622902 / 0413 -2241561>Website: www.icyer.com>www.geocities.com/yognat2001/i_am_here>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Do you ?> Mail is new and improved - Check it out!_______________Get FREE unlimited Citibank ATM transactions! http://go.msnserver.com/IN/54174.asp Discover real-value banking here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.