what a disgrace!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Guest guest]

here iam to discuss a very sensitive topic.these days a trend is

going very popular & that is to think & make everything into symbols or

prateekartha.wat i mean is a new kind of dharama called " modern

dharma " is going very popular these days.for example-i read an

article in a newspaper a few days ago that talked about yagya & the

speaker transformed everything into symbols or prateeks.hye told

that the fire god means the pran shakti,chastity & wood meanthe dry

vasanas in us .wen the agni contacted wid the wood it burnt in the

similar way we burn our vasanas & increase our knowledge & go to agni

loka that is recive peacefurther were given more symbols & the example

i have presented is among the smallest.from somewhere else i heard

that these apsaras were all we today call as actors & actresses.they

were indeed beautiful & were praised by people as they are

today.further shastras say that they were expert at acting & dancing

wid,many other things-wow what a similarity,wat a knowledge & wat a

disgrace!!!!!!!!!-does this meansthat all this knowledge on

apsaras & their sadhanasrfake!!!furtherWat iread was a book " vayam

rakshamah " by acharya chatursen the great writer.bt I don't think

so .wat he has written is a book on life of ravana ,in whichswarga

or the paradiase is told that it was located in Russia,andhralaya as

Australia & many other lokas like satya lokas,vaikunth,brahmakok all

on earth.vishnu is shown much more of a villain than a hero.only

rudra is shown likehero even vishnu's old age has been

discussed.ram is a different guy.he tells that he has read all

shastras very thoroughly & now his mind is empty & it took him 11 months

to rite it.narada is called as a bhukkhara,nanga sant(hungry,naked)

who by lord shiva was denied entry into kailash as he started

praying indra for soma or drink.he told that all apsaras

& gandharavas live in hills.i read a literature on `lokas' which told

all ideas related to lokas & lso discussed that these days some modern

writers do wat acharaya chatursen did.the book was written in 1957

that means he was modern enough!!!secondly I wathched movie da vinci

code that barked about lord jesus.from paintings of Leonardo da

vinci & triangle like symbols of male & female to the conclusion that

he married mary magdelene & at the time of crucification she was

praegnant & that holy grail is not a cup its mary herself.it was by

grace of secret groups that even till today the secret about jesus

has been hidden & the descendents of jesus are been killed so that

the people wont know about it!!bt still the movie makers & dan brown(

the writer of the novel )said that these are just based on certain

thoughts & is more of a fiction & can even be true.-I would rather like

to read love stories than this .also in book by nehru –discovery of

India its said that ram killed a shudra as he was doing penance on

saying by narada muni.wat is all this non sense !!!!why is every

thing transformd to prateeks,is it so that sceptic people & this new

generation wid English on their tongues & wearing small clothes would

believe & not make a fun of it.wat new stories I would come across in

future.readers give me ur views. & I would like to say only one thing-

blood boils inside me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Guest guest]

I absolutely agree with your email. These writers who have never had first hand experience write articles like these to make money. They think by provoking more and making it controversial, they can sell more books. You will agree with me that most of these books are written in English. ashishjen_9635 <ashishjen_9635 wrote: here iam to discuss a very sensitive topic.these days a trend is going very popular & that is to think & make everything into symbols or prateekartha.wat i mean is a new kind of dharama called"modern dharma "is going very popular these days.for example-i read an article in a newspaper a few days ago that talked about yagya & the speaker transformed everything into symbols or prateeks.hye told that the fire god means the pran shakti,chastity & wood meanthe dry vasanas in us .wen the agni contacted wid the wood it burnt in the similar way we burn our vasanas & increase our knowledge & go to agni loka that is recive peacefurther were given more symbols & the example i have presented is among the smallest.from somewhere else i heard that these apsaras

were all we today call as actors & actresses.they were indeed beautiful & were praised by people as they are today.further shastras say that they were expert at acting & dancing wid,many other things-wow what a similarity,wat a knowledge & wat a disgrace!!!!!!!!!-does this meansthat all this knowledge on apsaras & their sadhanasrfake!!!furtherWat iread was a book "vayam rakshamah"by acharya chatursen the great writer.bt I don't think so .wat he has written is a book on life of ravana ,in whichswarga or the paradiase is told that it was located in Russia,andhralaya as Australia & many other lokas like satya lokas,vaikunth,brahmakok all on earth.vishnu is shown much more of a villain than a hero.only rudra is shown likehero even vishnu's old age has been discussed.ram is a different guy.he tells that he has read all shastras very thoroughly & now his mind is empty & it took him 11 months

to rite it.narada is called as a bhukkhara,nanga sant(hungry,naked)who by lord shiva was denied entry into kailash as he started praying indra for soma or drink.he told that all apsaras & gandharavas live in hills.i read a literature on `lokas' which told all ideas related to lokas & lso discussed that these days some modern writers do wat acharaya chatursen did.the book was written in 1957 that means he was modern enough!!!secondly I wathched movie da vinci code that barked about lord jesus.from paintings of Leonardo da vinci & triangle like symbols of male & female to the conclusion that he married mary magdelene & at the time of crucification she was praegnant & that holy grail is not a cup its mary herself.it was by grace of secret groups that even till today the secret about jesus has been hidden & the descendents of jesus are been killed so that the people wont know about it!!bt still the

movie makers & dan brown( the writer of the novel )said that these are just based on certain thoughts & is more of a fiction & can even be true.-I would rather like to read love stories than this .also in book by nehru –discovery of India its said that ram killed a shudra as he was doing penance on saying by narada muni.wat is all this non sense !!!!why is every thing transformd to prateeks,is it so that sceptic people & this new generation wid English on their tongues & wearing small clothes would believe & not make a fun of it.wat new stories I would come across in future.readers give me ur views. & I would like to say only one thing-blood boils inside me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for your free

account today.

[Guest guest]

Dear Gurubhai,

 

I have read " Da Vinci Code " and presently reading " Vayam Rakshamay "

by Acharya Chatursen. I did some small research on legend of Mary

Magdalene. It is very clear that plot of the book is fiction but

there is sure enough basis to atleast debate the issue that Christ

married Mary Magdalene. In Da Vinci's painting " The Last Supper " , the

person sitting on right of Jesus actually seems to be a lady. Bodies

of Jesus and this lady (Mary Magdalene) do form a Inverted triangle

shape which is the symbol of Shakti. The philosophy of Secret Society

discussed in " Da Vinci Code " match the practices of Tantra. The star

of David is the same as symbol of Lord Shiva. Recently I received

Bhagyodaya Diksha from Guru Ji in Gurudham Delhi. I was surprised to

see that the Yantra I received from Guru Dham had a Pentacle as

widely discussed in Da Vinci Code. This symbol was widely used in

older sects before Christianity. It surely shows that there is lot of

similarity in worlds oldest Religions. It is mentioned in Vayam

Rakshamay that Holy stone at Mekka is actually a Shivling and Muslims

actually worship Makkeshwar Mahadev at Mekka. I have myself heard

Pujya Gurudev Narayan Duut Srimali Ji himself saying that Lord Shiva

was actually great Rishi. But he was such powerfull that Dev, Danav,

Detya, Yaksha, Rakshasa every body feared from him, same sentiment

comes from Rudra Path shlokas.

 

But we should not restrict Lord Shiva to physical form. He is called

Param Atma and we are all Atmas. One Gurubhai had expressed opinion

that he feels Gurudev is himself Shiva or atleat an Avatar of Shiva.

I myself think like that. Reason for this is that location of

Sidhashram is near Kailash Peak and Mansarowar which is the abode of

Lord Shiva. Sidhashram is the highest seat of Spirituality and Param

Gurudev is presiding over Sidhashram. What can you derive from this?

 

This message is becoming very long. There is a lot I can say on this

but I have some urgent work.

 

So cool down and think by your heart. I feel great to think that our

Hindu Dharma is of such antiquity that is why it is called Sanatan

Dharma. Lastly I quote from Iqbal

 

" Unan Misra Roma sab mit gaye jahan se, kuch hei ki baki hai namo

nishan hamara "

 

Jai Gurudev,

 

Vasishta

 

, " ashishjen_9635 "

<ashishjen_9635 wrote:

>

> here iam to discuss a very sensitive topic.these days a trend is

> going very popular & that is to think & make everything into symbols

or

> prateekartha.wat i mean is a new kind of dharama called " modern

> dharma " is going very popular these days.for example-i read an

> article in a newspaper a few days ago that talked about yagya & the

> speaker transformed everything into symbols or prateeks.hye told

> that the fire god means the pran shakti,chastity & wood meanthe dry

> vasanas in us .wen the agni contacted wid the wood it burnt in the

> similar way we burn our vasanas & increase our knowledge & go to agni

> loka that is recive peacefurther were given more symbols & the

example

> i have presented is among the smallest.from somewhere else i heard

> that these apsaras were all we today call as actors

& actresses.they

> were indeed beautiful & were praised by people as they are

> today.further shastras say that they were expert at acting & dancing

> wid,many other things-wow what a similarity,wat a knowledge & wat a

> disgrace!!!!!!!!!-does this meansthat all this knowledge on

> apsaras & their sadhanasrfake!!!furtherWat iread was a book " vayam

> rakshamah " by acharya chatursen the great writer.bt I don't think

> so .wat he has written is a book on life of ravana ,in whichswarga

> or the paradiase is told that it was located in Russia,andhralaya

as

> Australia & many other lokas like satya lokas,vaikunth,brahmakok all

> on earth.vishnu is shown much more of a villain than a hero.only

> rudra is shown likehero even vishnu's old age has been

> discussed.ram is a different guy.he tells that he has read all

> shastras very thoroughly & now his mind is empty & it took him 11

months

> to rite it.narada is called as a bhukkhara,nanga sant(hungry,naked)

> who by lord shiva was denied entry into kailash as he started

> praying indra for soma or drink.he told that all apsaras

> & gandharavas live in hills.i read a literature on `lokas' which

told

> all ideas related to lokas & lso discussed that these days some

modern

> writers do wat acharaya chatursen did.the book was written in 1957

> that means he was modern enough!!!secondly I wathched movie da

vinci

> code that barked about lord jesus.from paintings of Leonardo da

> vinci & triangle like symbols of male & female to the conclusion that

> he married mary magdelene & at the time of crucification she was

> praegnant & that holy grail is not a cup its mary herself.it was by

> grace of secret groups that even till today the secret about jesus

> has been hidden & the descendents of jesus are been killed so that

> the people wont know about it!!bt still the movie makers & dan brown

(

> the writer of the novel )said that these are just based on certain

> thoughts & is more of a fiction & can even be true.-I would rather

like

> to read love stories than this .also in book by nehru –discovery of

> India its said that ram killed a shudra as he was doing penance on

> saying by narada muni.wat is all this non sense !!!!why is every

> thing transformd to prateeks,is it so that sceptic people & this

new

> generation wid English on their tongues & wearing small clothes would

> believe & not make a fun of it.wat new stories I would come across in

> future.readers give me ur views. & I would like to say only one thing-

> blood boils inside me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>