Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Dear gurubhai, I was re- reading Valmiki Ramayan Uttar Khand on last Sunday. In this Khand Lord Rama is ruling over his Rajya after Battle of Lanka. When a number of rishis come to meet Sri Rama. In answer to a question of Lord Rama, Agastaya Rishi tells the story about Rakshas Vansh and Ravan in particular. You should read this. It is mentioned in Ramayana also that Devas/Adityas and deityas were born from Aditi and Diti respectively who both were wives of Kashyap Rishi. Chatursen has told that Kashyap Rishi had two other wives. One was Dini from whom Danavas were born and from other wife Nag, Garud were born. In fact the whole human race has been told to be descedent of Rishi Kashyap. There is a clash with evolution theory which says that we evolved from monkeys. But there seems to be a gap in evolution of man. Like the sciences of Astrology, Ayurved, Vastu, Yoga,Tantra, Sanskrit language, music, dance forms, highly evolved number systems of some civilisations etc. I for one don't believe tha we evolved from monkeys without any other external assistance. Does this means that we were in contact with some highly evolved beings from other planets. Yes it seems likely if we carefully look for clues. Is it possible that Kashyap Rishi himself was from highly evolved race from some other planet and Great Lord created human race like we keep and breed pets for our entertainment. These are So, I am not denying the possibility of existance of other Lokas or planets having highly advanced civilisations. In fact this same view is expressed in the books " Chariots of Gods " and " Secret World of Agharti " . As for apsaras they of course were dancers, actresses or you can say they were like Nagar Vadhus. In Devas there was no marriage system. It was an open society. So apasaras had to go to whomsoever invited them or went to them. This is mentioned in Valmiki Ramayan. When Ravan did Balatkar with Rambha. But apsaras were also highly evolved beings. Apsara Sadhna is a Soundrya Sadhna which is done to open up our heart and learn to love. To gain beauty and vitality like them and get help from them. Well this again has become quite long message. The deeper you go into these mysteries the more wonder struck and confused you become. We can just say unfathomable are the mysteries of Great Lord (Param Brahma). But it is very easy to find Him if we just look inside ourselves. Amin. Jai Gurudev. Vasishta. , " Puneet Kr. Vasishta " <pk_vasishta wrote: > > Dear Gurubhai, > > I have read " Da Vinci Code " and presently reading " Vayam Rakshamay " > by Acharya Chatursen. I did some small research on legend of Mary > Magdalene. It is very clear that plot of the book is fiction but > there is sure enough basis to atleast debate the issue that Christ > married Mary Magdalene. In Da Vinci's painting " The Last Supper " , the > person sitting on right of Jesus actually seems to be a lady. Bodies > of Jesus and this lady (Mary Magdalene) do form a Inverted triangle > shape which is the symbol of Shakti. The philosophy of Secret Society > discussed in " Da Vinci Code " match the practices of Tantra. The star > of David is the same as symbol of Lord Shiva. Recently I received > Bhagyodaya Diksha from Guru Ji in Gurudham Delhi. I was surprised to > see that the Yantra I received from Guru Dham had a Pentacle as > widely discussed in Da Vinci Code. This symbol was widely used in > older sects before Christianity. It surely shows that there is lot of > similarity in worlds oldest Religions. It is mentioned in Vayam > Rakshamay that Holy stone at Mekka is actually a Shivling and Muslims > actually worship Makkeshwar Mahadev at Mekka. I have myself heard > Pujya Gurudev Narayan Duut Srimali Ji himself saying that Lord Shiva > was actually great Rishi. But he was such powerfull that Dev, Danav, > Detya, Yaksha, Rakshasa every body feared from him, same sentiment > comes from Rudra Path shlokas. > > But we should not restrict Lord Shiva to physical form. He is called > Param Atma and we are all Atmas. One Gurubhai had expressed opinion > that he feels Gurudev is himself Shiva or atleat an Avatar of Shiva. > I myself think like that. Reason for this is that location of > Sidhashram is near Kailash Peak and Mansarowar which is the abode of > Lord Shiva. Sidhashram is the highest seat of Spirituality and Param > Gurudev is presiding over Sidhashram. What can you derive from this? > > This message is becoming very long. There is a lot I can say on this > but I have some urgent work. > > So cool down and think by your heart. I feel great to think that our > Hindu Dharma is of such antiquity that is why it is called Sanatan > Dharma. Lastly I quote from Iqbal > > " Unan Misra Roma sab mit gaye jahan se, kuch hei ki baki hai namo > nishan hamara " > > Jai Gurudev, > > Vasishta > > , " ashishjen_9635 " > <ashishjen_9635@> wrote: > > > > here iam to discuss a very sensitive topic.these days a trend is > > going very popular & that is to think & make everything into symbols > or > > prateekartha.wat i mean is a new kind of dharama called " modern > > dharma " is going very popular these days.for example-i read an > > article in a newspaper a few days ago that talked about yagya & the > > speaker transformed everything into symbols or prateeks.hye told > > that the fire god means the pran shakti,chastity & wood meanthe dry > > vasanas in us .wen the agni contacted wid the wood it burnt in the > > similar way we burn our vasanas & increase our knowledge & go to agni > > loka that is recive peacefurther were given more symbols & the > example > > i have presented is among the smallest.from somewhere else i heard > > that these apsaras were all we today call as actors > & actresses.they > > were indeed beautiful & were praised by people as they are > > today.further shastras say that they were expert at acting & dancing > > wid,many other things-wow what a similarity,wat a knowledge & wat a > > disgrace!!!!!!!!!-does this meansthat all this knowledge on > > apsaras & their sadhanasrfake!!!furtherWat iread was a book " vayam > > rakshamah " by acharya chatursen the great writer.bt I don't think > > so .wat he has written is a book on life of ravana ,in whichswarga > > or the paradiase is told that it was located in Russia,andhralaya > as > > Australia & many other lokas like satya lokas,vaikunth,brahmakok all > > on earth.vishnu is shown much more of a villain than a hero.only > > rudra is shown likehero even vishnu's old age has been > > discussed.ram is a different guy.he tells that he has read all > > shastras very thoroughly & now his mind is empty & it took him 11 > months > > to rite it.narada is called as a bhukkhara,nanga sant (hungry,naked) > > who by lord shiva was denied entry into kailash as he started > > praying indra for soma or drink.he told that all apsaras > > & gandharavas live in hills.i read a literature on `lokas' which > told > > all ideas related to lokas & lso discussed that these days some > modern > > writers do wat acharaya chatursen did.the book was written in 1957 > > that means he was modern enough!!!secondly I wathched movie da > vinci > > code that barked about lord jesus.from paintings of Leonardo da > > vinci & triangle like symbols of male & female to the conclusion that > > he married mary magdelene & at the time of crucification she was > > praegnant & that holy grail is not a cup its mary herself.it was by > > grace of secret groups that even till today the secret about jesus > > has been hidden & the descendents of jesus are been killed so that > > the people wont know about it!!bt still the movie makers & dan brown > ( > > the writer of the novel )said that these are just based on certain > > thoughts & is more of a fiction & can even be true.-I would rather > like > > to read love stories than this .also in book by nehru –discovery of > > India its said that ram killed a shudra as he was doing penance on > > saying by narada muni.wat is all this non sense !!!!why is every > > thing transformd to prateeks,is it so that sceptic people & this > new > > generation wid English on their tongues & wearing small clothes would > > believe & not make a fun of it.wat new stories I would come across in > > future.readers give me ur views. & I would like to say only one thing- > > blood boils inside me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.