Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Dear satish, The vana-durga mantra drashta is Aranyaka Rishi who is none other than Kiraata-rupa Narayana. He is shown as Varaha (Hunter) residing in forests. The paramatma Narayana in the form of Narayani is the Upasya Devata. Narayana is also the Kirata-rupa Narayana. The Kirata is the Yajna Varaha rupa. Hence, Kirata Varaahi is none other than Vanadurga. Agni of Rg Veda is the Narayana and Agni-teja is Narayani. Since, the residence of Kirata is in the forest, Yajnavaraaha rupa Narayani is called “Vana Durgaâ€. It was originally worshipped in forests by rishis who used to reside in Vana. The mantra bhaga also finds its origin in Aranyaka Kanda of Veda. And Aranyaka Kanda is studied in Forest. And hence, this Mantra has been coined as Vana-Durga. One of the weapons of Kiraata Varahi is Plough which is symbolically represented as the bestower of fruits of action. And hence, the Durga Sukta says “Karma Phaleshu Jushtaamâ€. The rg vedic references are found in Durga and Aranyani Sukta respectively. With regards, Sriram Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 Dear Sriram, , venkata sriram <sriram_sapthasathi wrote: > It was originally worshipped in forests by rishis who used to >reside in Vana. The mantra bhaga also finds its origin in Aranyaka >Kanda of >Veda. And Aranyaka Kanda is studied in Forest. And hence, >this >Mantra has been coined as Vana-Durga. I am no expert on these but this seems more plausible and Ganapati muni expresses something similar. >Bhramara Durga, Pakshi Durga and others are used for tantrika prayogas whereas Vana Durga is a Mula Durga and hence her upasana is called Maha Vidya. And hence, rest of the Durgas have not been >equated with this status of Mahavidya. Probably. But one will find scores of vana-durgA prayoga-s for wordly ends in various texts just like for other durgA-s. bhAskararAya refers to vanadurgA in his LS commentary when commenting on the name mahAvidyA. >As regards the linguistics, it is a different branch by itself. >Please donot use the word " fanciful " because it pains me to see this >word being used when some amount of brains has been used here. Sorry if that sounded offensive. I used the word in the sense that the interpretation/derivation is on shaky grounds i.e. not solid but left (to a great part) to speculation/imagination. Can you please clarify what do you mean by linguistics here? Are you referring to vyAkarana? Or did you mean linguistics as studied and taught in academic circles in the west? >How do you explain the word " Purushi " in Vana Durga Mantra. And as >regards, >other emanations, my knowledge is limited so i would like you to >please explain >the concept of Giri, Jala, Pavana Durgas I am asking you because I dont know. The reason for questioning is that teh explanation for puruShi looked somewhat doubtful. >In Subhagodaya Stuthi, Acharya Gaudapada in 44th sloka, uses the word > " Mahadeva " while addressing the consort of Bhairavai. He should have >put the >word " Bhairava " . But he did not. Instead he addressed as Mahadeva. >What is the >hridaya of Acharya? It could be for many reasons. Sometimes choice of words can be simply for poetic reasons? >What is the purport behind it? What is the relation between Mahadeva >and Bhairava? Bhairava in the popular purANa-s is an attendant of shiva. In tantra it means shiva. One will find lots of instances where they are used interchangeably. Would like to hear if you have something interesting to say here. Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.