Guest guest Posted November 14, 2008 Report Share Posted November 14, 2008 Dear members, Shri Bhashyam Swamigal of Sringeri has written “Shri Jagatguru Sankaracharya Laghu Puja Paddhatihâ€. Alongwith with that, he has also compiled Sankaracharya Trishati, Ashtottara, Sankaracharya Sahasranamavalih, Vidyaranya Ashtottara Namavali and some other stotrams. Shri Bharati Tirtha Mahaswamigal has graced me this small book of Bhashyam Swamigal during my visit to Sringeri. If possible, I will post the “Sankaracharya Laghu Puja Paddhatih†on Ambaal Forum (if time permits) for the benefit of followers of Sankara Sampradaya so that they can perform the simple puja to Acharya Sankara during Sankara Jayanti . Given below is the “Vidyaranya Ashtottara Namavali†which could be used during Vidyaranya Jayanti. Needless to say, Shri Vidyaranya is our prAthahsmaraNIyA, who apart from the founder minister of Hampi Vijayanagara Empire was also the acharya of Sringeri Pita. shrI vidyAraNya aShttotara shatanAmAvalih Om vidyAraNyamahAyoginE namah Om mahAvidyAprakAshakAya namah Om shrIvidyAnagaroddhartrE namah Om vidyAratnamahodadhayE namah Om ramAyaNamahAsaptakotimantraprakAshakAya namah Om shrIdEvIkaruNApUrNAya namah Om paripUrNamanorathAya namah Om virUpAkShamahAkShEtrasvarNavriShTiprakalpAya namah Om vEdatrayollasatbhAShyakartrE namah Om tattvA(a)rthakovidAya namah Om bhagavatpAdanirNItasiddhAntasthApanaprabhavE namah Om varNA(a)(a)shramasAravidE namah Om nigamA(a)gamavyavasthAtrE namah Om shrImatkarNATakarAjashrIrAjyasimhAsanapradAya namah Om shrImadbukkamahIpAlarAjyapaTTAbhiShEkakritE namah Om achAryakritabhAShyA(a)(a)digranthavrittiprakalpAya namah Om sakalopaniShadbhAshyadIpikA(a)(a)diprakAshakritE namah Om sarvashAstrArthatattvajnAya namah Om mantrashAstrA(a)bdhimantharAya namah Om vidwanmaNishirahshlAghyabahugranthavidhyAyakAya namah Om sAraswatasamuddhartrE namah Om sArA(a)sAravichakShaNAya namah Om shroutasmArtasadA(a)(a)chArasaMsthApanadhuraMdharAya namah Om vEdashAstrabahirbhUtadurmatAM(a)hodhishoShakAya namah Om durvAdigarvadAvA(a)gnayE namah Om pratipakShEbhakEsariNE namah Om yashojaivAtrkajotsnAprakAshitadigantarAya namah Om aShTA(a)MgayoganiShnAtAya namah Om sAmkhyayogavishAradAya namah Om rAjA(a)dhirAjasaMdohapUjyamAnapadA(a)MbujAya namah //(30)// //………to be continued…….// With regards, sriram Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2008 Report Share Posted November 14, 2008 A few more historic notes of Sri Vidyaranya: 1) it is believed that Sayanacharya was a brother of V. 2) they had another brother and the trio lived in poverty 3) V carried out upaasana of Gayathri, and was frustrated altogether during the course of few years. He moved to wooded area and continued his sadhanaa. At one point, out of desperation, he decided to gave up his life for a Darshan of Gayathri. At the critical moment, his prayers were answerd. He prayed for " rain of gold and honey " on the land and for Dharmarakshana. The boon was granted.That was the place where the capital of vijyanagara empire is said to have been built and literally gold, pearls, and natural bounties were sold on the streets of that empire city. 4) In his later days, he entered into an intellectual challenge with Sri Akshobya teertha of Sri Madhwacharya (Dwaita) lineage. A. was also old and they had a common friend,Sri Nigamantha Desika. The vivadha took place in the historic university at Mulubhagalu. A. went into a cave in that mutt and prayed to Yoga narasimha. He started drawing the bhimbham of Sri Yoga Narasimha with an angaara - or coal piece used for aarathi. for a few weeks the debate went on and by the blessings of Narasimha, Desika declared A. to be the winner. The contentious breakthrough was for the Dwaitha vs Advaita interpretation of : tat tvam asee, a brahma vaakya. It is said that V. remained a friend of Desika and Akshobya seers until his death. A vijaya sthamba was erected and STILL STANDS ON A HILLOCK at mulubhagalu as a witness to the diversity of intellectual and religious thoughts of that time. 4) V. was given a promise in his tapas that the hindu dharma saamrajya will hold for a few thousand years if everything starts at a given muhuurtha. But history will tell us that it did not. The muhurthaa would get screwed up by miscommunication (messaging by shouting) between V and his disciples. Later, V would read the charts and declare that the samraajya would not last more than 400 years because the muhurthaa was missed. It did not. 5) as a mentor for a great hindu dharma rejuvination, a brother and elder of Sayanaa, a rajarishi of initial vijyanagara kings, a peer of great saints in dark times of religious oppression, a leader of advaita peetam, Vidhyaranya was a pioneer for modern hindu religion and saastra. My respects to him. -gopal --- On Fri, 11/14/08, venkata sriram <sriram_sapthasathi wrote: venkata sriram <sriram_sapthasathi Vidyaranya Ashtottara Satanamavalih (Part - 1) Friday, November 14, 2008, 8:43 AM Dear members, Shri Bhashyam Swamigal of Sringeri has written “Shri Jagatguru Sankaracharya Laghu Puja Paddhatih”. Alongwith with that, he has also compiled Sankaracharya Trishati, Ashtottara, Sankaracharya Sahasranamavalih, Vidyaranya Ashtottara Namavali and some other stotrams. Shri Bharati Tirtha Mahaswamigal has graced me this small book of Bhashyam Swamigal during my visit to Sringeri. If possible, I will post the “Sankaracharya Laghu Puja Paddhatih” on Ambaal Forum (if time permits) for the benefit of followers of Sankara Sampradaya so that they can perform the simple puja to Acharya Sankara during Sankara Jayanti .. Given below is the “Vidyaranya Ashtottara Namavali” which could be used during Vidyaranya Jayanti. Needless to say, Shri Vidyaranya is our prAthahsmaraNIyA, who apart from the founder minister of Hampi Vijayanagara Empire was also the acharya of Sringeri Pita. shrI vidyAraNya aShttotara shatanAmAvalih Om vidyAraNyamahAyogin E namah Om mahAvidyAprakAshakA ya namah Om shrIvidyAnagaroddha rtrE namah Om vidyAratnamahodadha yE namah Om ramAyaNamahAsaptako timantraprakAsha kAya namah Om shrIdEvIkaruNApUrNA ya namah Om paripUrNamanorathAy a namah Om virUpAkShamahAkShEt rasvarNavriShTip rakalpAya namah Om vEdatrayollasatbhAS hyakartrE namah Om tattvA(a)rthakovidA ya namah Om bhagavatpAdanirNIta siddhAntasthApan aprabhavE namah Om varNA(a)(a)shramasA ravidE namah Om nigamA(a)gamavyavas thAtrE namah Om shrImatkarNATakarAj ashrIrAjyasimhAs anapradAya namah Om shrImadbukkamahIpAl arAjyapaTTAbhiSh EkakritE namah Om achAryakritabhAShyA (a)(a)digranthav rittiprakalpAya namah Om sakalopaniShadbhAsh yadIpikA( a)(a)diprakAshak ritE namah Om sarvashAstrArthatat tvajnAya namah Om mantrashAstrA( a)bdhimantharAya namah Om vidwanmaNishirahshl Aghyabahugrantha vidhyAyakAya namah Om sAraswatasamuddhart rE namah Om sArA(a)sAravichakSh aNAya namah Om shroutasmArtasadA( a)(a)chArasaMsth ApanadhuraMdharA ya namah Om vEdashAstrabahirbhU tadurmatAM( a)hodhishoShakAy a namah Om durvAdigarvadAvA( a)gnayE namah Om pratipakShEbhakEsar iNE namah Om yashojaivAtrkajotsn AprakAshitadigan tarAya namah Om aShTA(a)MgayoganiSh nAtAya namah Om sAmkhyayogavishArad Aya namah Om rAjA(a)dhirAjasaMdo hapUjyamAnapadA( a)MbujAya namah //(30)// //………to be continued…….// With regards, sriram ------------ --------- --------- --- Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2008 Report Share Posted November 14, 2008 , Gopal Gopinath <gopal_gopinath wrote: >> 4) In his later days, he entered into an intellectual challenge with Sri Akshobya teertha of Sri Madhwacharya (Dwaita) lineage. A. was also old and they had a common friend,Sri Nigamantha Desika. The vivadha took place in the historic university at Mulubhagalu. A. went into a cave in that mutt and prayed to Yoga narasimha. He started drawing the bhimbham of Sri Yoga Narasimha with an angaara - or coal piece used for aarathi. for a few weeks the debate went on and by the blessings of Narasimha, Desika declared A. to be the winner. The contentious breakthrough was for the Dwaitha vs Advaita interpretation of : tat tvam asee, a brahma vaakya. It is said that V. remained a friend of Desika and Akshobya seers until his death. A vijaya sthamba was erected and STILL STANDS ON A HILLOCK at mulubhagalu as a witness to the diversity of intellectual and >>religious thoughts of that time. Looks like a one-sided story to me. Sometimes it is brought up by dvaitins to prove their superiority. As though people of shankara tradition are not nR^isiMha upAsaka-s.... Anyway it is just another " story " . >> 4) V. was given a promise in his tapas that the hindu dharma saamrajya will hold for a few thousand years if everything starts at a given muhuurtha. But history will tell us that it did not. The muhurthaa would get screwed up by miscommunication (messaging by shouting) between V and his disciples. Later, V would read the charts and declare that the samraajya would not last more than 400 years >>because the muhurthaa was missed. It did not. According to another version he was about to inscribe a bhuvaneshvarI yantra to make that empire long lasting and invited a famous astrologer from kAshi and they decided that the astrologer will blow his conch at the right time so that V can start inscribing this bhuvaneshvari yantra. But unfortunately V confused a certain jangama blowing his conch as the muhurta and later when he hears another he gets disappointed and declares that because of this the empire will only last a few hundred years. > Shri Bhashyam Swamigal of Sringeri has written " Shri Jagatguru >Sankaracharya Laghu Puja Paddhatih " . Alongwith with that, he has >also compiled Sankaracharya Trishati, Ashtottara, Sankaracharya >Sahasranamavalih, Vidyaranya Ashtottara Namavali and some other >stotrams. Ofcourse everyone fondly remembers and pay their prespects to great people in their tradition but I am not sure what will people get out of reciting V ashtottara or Shankaracharya trishati or sahasranama? That is just going to ati. And funny that they criticise people of ati-mArga..lol May be AchArya and V are best pleased by someone sincerely performing nitya karma-s, intense upAsana, and strengthing dharma rather than with somebody who spends an hour with laghu or bR^ihat Shankaracharya pUja paddhati and reciting AchArya sahasranama!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2008 Report Share Posted November 14, 2008 Dear Satish, I have to apologize for some typos and syntax issues with my previous mail - i forgot to edit it. 4) the point was not about Nrsimha upaasana for all said! The yoga narasimha cave with a bhimbam of Sri Nrisimha is still there at the Mulubagalu mutt where Sri SriPadaraya's moola brindavanaa is located. Sri Padaraya was another Raja Guru of Chaluva kings of vijayanagara empire who reinstated vaideeka karma paddhathi at Tirumala along with his disciple Sri Vyaasaraja. Now, why it should always be looked as a fight to death if an advaithin and dwaithin debate? According to the historical notes,the a dwaithi and an advaithi debated with a visishtadvaithi as the judge. They all separated as friends. Sanathana Dharma survived. Why to add colors and shades and arguments? Each of the three involved were giants of their times, pillars of modern hindu rejuvenation. why should one have to have been correct while others wrong? I sometimes dont understand the strokes of brush you use to color historical and sastric events - whatever the level of evidence they may have. Between black and white, there is a very big valley of gray and most of us fall in that region! A vijyasthamba stands at Mulubagalu - as usual uncared for with inscriptions and a date. Three seers came together and talked their hearts and brain out. Nothing negative came out and only good things happened after that. Why should we start interpreting this historical incident as one school is putting down another etc. Why can't this be looked with a bit of objectivity and regarded as it is worth? 5) Kasi astrologer - conch version: I have heard of it too in many places but did not want belabor on it. Thanks. The fact is that Vidyaranya had a monumental role in establishing a barricade to the sway of muslim rulers who extended their political prowess to the religion domain too in south india in 1400's. Regarding Ashtothra: I have no comments. As much as I am not an advaiti or admirer of sayanaa's interpretation of Rig Veda, I have enormous respects to both of them. Even now with just active 50-60 active members in a list meant of Ambaal devotees, we have 100 versions of sastraas and countless arguments. That too, I would guess only 10% would have done a proper adhyayana of sastras WITH meaning. Imagine 600 years back the plight of Sayanaa to gather the interpretations, practice, schools of thought and debate etc. in spite of fanaticism of black and white painters all over India to compile his commentary of Rg Veda. Those were the times when there were no common portal for exchange and one huge tsunami of muslim invasion. If two persons can achieve an Empire and a commentary of Rg veda in spite of these things, they deserve my respects, so as to say. -gopal --- On Fri, 11/14/08, Satish <satisharigela wrote: Satish <satisharigela Re: Vidyaranya Ashtottara Satanamavalih (Part - 1) Friday, November 14, 2008, 10:32 AM @ .com, Gopal Gopinath <gopal_gopinath@ ....> wrote: >> 4) In his later days, he entered into an intellectual challenge with Sri Akshobya teertha of Sri Madhwacharya (Dwaita) lineage. A. was also old and they had a common friend,Sri Nigamantha Desika. The vivadha took place in the historic university at Mulubhagalu. A. went into a cave in that mutt and prayed to Yoga narasimha. He started drawing the bhimbham of Sri Yoga Narasimha with an angaara - or coal piece used for aarathi. for a few weeks the debate went on and by the blessings of Narasimha, Desika declared A. to be the winner. The contentious breakthrough was for the Dwaitha vs Advaita interpretation of : tat tvam asee, a brahma vaakya. It is said that V. remained a friend of Desika and Akshobya seers until his death. A vijaya sthamba was erected and STILL STANDS ON A HILLOCK at mulubhagalu as a witness to the diversity of intellectual and >>religious thoughts of that time. Looks like a one-sided story to me. Sometimes it is brought up by dvaitins to prove their superiority. As though people of shankara tradition are not nR^isiMha upAsaka-s... . Anyway it is just another " story " . >> 4) V. was given a promise in his tapas that the hindu dharma saamrajya will hold for a few thousand years if everything starts at a given muhuurtha. But history will tell us that it did not. The muhurthaa would get screwed up by miscommunication (messaging by shouting) between V and his disciples. Later, V would read the charts and declare that the samraajya would not last more than 400 years >>because the muhurthaa was missed. It did not. According to another version he was about to inscribe a bhuvaneshvarI yantra to make that empire long lasting and invited a famous astrologer from kAshi and they decided that the astrologer will blow his conch at the right time so that V can start inscribing this bhuvaneshvari yantra. But unfortunately V confused a certain jangama blowing his conch as the muhurta and later when he hears another he gets disappointed and declares that because of this the empire will only last a few hundred years. > Shri Bhashyam Swamigal of Sringeri has written " Shri Jagatguru >Sankaracharya Laghu Puja Paddhatih " . Alongwith with that, he has >also compiled Sankaracharya Trishati, Ashtottara, Sankaracharya >Sahasranamavalih, Vidyaranya Ashtottara Namavali and some other >stotrams. Ofcourse everyone fondly remembers and pay their prespects to great people in their tradition but I am not sure what will people get out of reciting V ashtottara or Shankaracharya trishati or sahasranama? That is just going to ati. And funny that they criticise people of ati-mArga..lol May be AchArya and V are best pleased by someone sincerely performing nitya karma-s, intense upAsana, and strengthing dharma rather than with somebody who spends an hour with laghu or bR^ihat Shankaracharya pUja paddhati and reciting AchArya sahasranama! ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2008 Report Share Posted November 14, 2008 > > May be AchArya and V are best pleased by someone sincerely performing > nitya karma-s, intense upAsana, and strengthing dharma rather than > with somebody who spends an hour with laghu or bR^ihat Shankaracharya > pUja paddhati and reciting AchArya sahasranama!! > > Studying these works and understanding their meanings could be very fruitful. I tried to understand 108 names of Acharya and posted long ago in Advaita-l (http://sanskritdocuments.org/all_pdf/shankara108m.pdf). I found that very helpful. In anything we do, we should strive to gain insight and understanding. Otherwise, borrowing the words of bhaaskaraaya, we will be like donkeys carrying sandalwood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 15, 2008 Report Share Posted November 15, 2008 Yes i too agree that one should follow the teachings instead of chanting sahasranamas and doing pujas. What is the use of parayana of Ramayana when we cannot imbibe the virtues of Rama!! But this is also a way of Guru Aradhana for mandAdhikArIs!! Nevertheless, atI sarvatra varjayEt... regs, sriram , " Satish " <satisharigela wrote: > > , Gopal Gopinath <gopal_gopinath@> > wrote: > > >> 4) In his later days, he entered into an intellectual challenge > with Sri Akshobya teertha of Sri Madhwacharya (Dwaita) lineage. A. > was also old and they had a common friend,Sri Nigamantha Desika. The > vivadha took place in the historic university at Mulubhagalu. A. > went into a cave in that mutt and prayed to Yoga narasimha. He > started drawing the bhimbham of Sri Yoga Narasimha with an angaara - > or coal piece used for aarathi. for a few weeks the debate went on > and by the blessings of Narasimha, Desika declared A. to be the > winner. The contentious breakthrough was for the Dwaitha vs Advaita > interpretation of : tat tvam asee, a brahma vaakya. It is said that > V. remained a friend of Desika and Akshobya seers until his death. A > vijaya sthamba was erected and STILL STANDS ON A HILLOCK at > mulubhagalu as a witness to the diversity of intellectual and > >>religious thoughts of that time. > > Looks like a one-sided story to me. Sometimes it is brought up by > dvaitins to prove their superiority. As though people of shankara > tradition are not nR^isiMha upAsaka-s.... > Anyway it is just another " story " . > > > >> 4) V. was given a promise in his tapas that the hindu dharma > saamrajya will hold for a few thousand years if everything starts at > a given muhuurtha. But history will tell us that it did not. The > muhurthaa would get screwed up by miscommunication (messaging by > shouting) between V and his disciples. Later, V would read the charts > and declare that the samraajya would not last more than 400 years > >>because the muhurthaa was missed. It did not. > > > According to another version he was about to inscribe a bhuvaneshvarI > yantra to make that empire long lasting and invited a famous > astrologer from kAshi and they decided that the astrologer will blow > his conch at the right time so that V can start inscribing this > bhuvaneshvari yantra. But unfortunately V confused a certain jangama > blowing his conch as the muhurta and later when he hears another he > gets disappointed and declares that because of this the empire will > only last a few hundred years. > > > > > Shri Bhashyam Swamigal of Sringeri has written " Shri Jagatguru > >Sankaracharya Laghu Puja Paddhatih " . Alongwith with that, he has > >also compiled Sankaracharya Trishati, Ashtottara, Sankaracharya > >Sahasranamavalih, Vidyaranya Ashtottara Namavali and some other > >stotrams. > > > Ofcourse everyone fondly remembers and pay their prespects to great > people in their tradition but I am not sure what will people get out > of reciting V ashtottara or Shankaracharya trishati or sahasranama? > > That is just going to ati. And funny that they criticise people of > ati-mArga..lol > > May be AchArya and V are best pleased by someone sincerely performing > nitya karma-s, intense upAsana, and strengthing dharma rather than > with somebody who spends an hour with laghu or bR^ihat Shankaracharya > pUja paddhati and reciting AchArya sahasranama!! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 15, 2008 Report Share Posted November 15, 2008 Namaste, , Gopal Gopinath <gopal_gopinath wrote: > 4) the point was not about Nrsimha upaasana for all said! The yoga narasimha cave with a bhimbam of Sri Nrisimha is still there at the Mulubagalu mutt where Sri SriPadaraya's moola brindavanaa is located. Sri Padaraya was another > Raja Guru of Chaluva kings of vijayanagara empire who reinstated vaideeka karma paddhathi at Tirumala along with his disciple Sri >>Vyaasaraja. The earlier post looked like it is trying to say that nR^isiMha's grace is what helped him to win over V. Hence my response. > > Now, why it should always be looked as a fight to death if an advaithin and dwaithin debate? According to the historical notes,the a dwaithi and an advaithi debated with a visishtadvaithi as the >>judge. They all separated as friends. Simply because this is not what your earlier post said. It mentioned AT as winner and a vijaya stambha erected for that. If your original post is anything closer to above then I would have read and left it there. >> Sanathana Dharma survived. Why to add colors and shades and arguments? Each of the three involved were giants of their times, pillars of modern hindu rejuvenation. why should one have to have >>been correct while others wrong? I dont think I said or suggested any of above. > >> I sometimes dont understand the strokes of brush you use to color historical and sastric events - whatever the level of evidence they may have. Between black and white, there is a very big valley of >>gray and most of us fall in that region! What you have observed is not someone coloring or oxidising history but a presentation from a different angle/perspective. See the last para. > >> A vijyasthamba stands at Mulubagalu - as usual uncared for with inscriptions and a date. Three seers came together and talked their hearts and brain out. Nothing negative came out and only good things happened after that. Why should we start interpreting this historical incident as one school is putting down another etc. Why can't this be >>looked with a bit of objectivity and regarded as it is worth? Why start something controversial and then downplay it? You did not simply say they debated and left as freinds. Your original post clearly mentioned that AT was declared *winner*. What does that mean? Please look at what you typed earlier: **for a few weeks the debate went on and by the blessings of Narasimha, Desika declared A. to be the winner.** To answer you other question during a thread a few months back: Ask yourself what is wrong or objectionable about including occult elements in understanding history. Even a high school student will notice that occult practices are part of Indian life and an important part. This is how it has been for millenia here. By ignoring this angle you are limiting yourself in your understanding. Plainly ignoring these does not make you a rational or an objective student of history. I hope you understand what I am saying. To an extent it is verifiable if not completely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 15, 2008 Report Share Posted November 15, 2008 Dear ravi, Namaste. I have gone through the Sankara Ashtottara Namavalih and has come up wonderfully. A small doubt. At the 105th name ie., " sadrantagarbhahErambhApUjakAya namah " you mentioned about the temple of Ratna Garbha Ganapathy Temple in Sringeri. But i did not find it anywhere in Sringeri. There is Sakti Ganapati Temple in Sringeri. Also there is Torana Ganapati and one more ganapati is there is Malahanikareshwara Temple. IMHO it might be that it is the Ratna Garbha Ganapati that is being worshipped as a part of Panchayatana by Jagatgurus. The Ganapati in the Panchayatana is called " Ratna Garbha Ganapati " as it is believed that there is jewel embedded in this Ganapati. Apart from this, there is Nrsimha Salagrama, Chandramoulishwara Linga and Sphatika Sriyantra. Please correct me if i am wrong. With regards, sriram , MSR <abhayambika wrote: > > > > > > May be AchArya and V are best pleased by someone sincerely performing > > nitya karma-s, intense upAsana, and strengthing dharma rather than > > with somebody who spends an hour with laghu or bR^ihat Shankaracharya > > pUja paddhati and reciting AchArya sahasranama!! > > > > > > > Studying these works and understanding their meanings could be very > fruitful. I tried to understand 108 names of Acharya and posted long ago > in Advaita-l (http://sanskritdocuments.org/all_pdf/shankara108m.pdf). I > found that very helpful. In anything we do, we should strive to gain > insight and understanding. Otherwise, borrowing the words of > bhaaskaraaya, we will be like donkeys carrying sandalwood. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
srinivassista Posted April 25, 2012 Report Share Posted April 25, 2012 Can you please post the link or post Sankaracharya Ashtottara Namavali Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.