Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 The correct pAThA of shrI sukta in MP3 mode can be downloaded from the link given below. ASFIK, this is the correct rg veda pAThA chanted by Kashmiri pundits.  Also the PDF document is available with svarAs.  http://manasataramgini.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/shri-sukta-of-the-rigveda  The correct pAThA is ‘mama Avaha†rather than “ma Avahaâ€.   With regards, sriram  Connect with friends all over the world. Get India Messenger at http://in.messenger./?wm=n/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 shrI gurubhyo namaH shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH " The correct pAThA is 'mama Avaha " rather than " ma Avaha " . This is not in accordance with the most popular chantings and teachings available nowadays. This is also not in accordance in the version taught to me by the priest who used to come to our house. He was trained at Shankara matham in Kanchipuram. Our ashram , based on our Guruji's teaching, also chants it as " taam ma Avaha " . To me, the correct pATha is as it is taught by the Guru. Thanks. shrI mAtre namaH _____ .. <http://geo./serv?s=97359714/grpId=1168176/grpspId=1705075991/msgId =11770/stime=1234843077/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 It is grammatically wrong and unfortunately most of the priests are teaching the wrong patha. This doesnot confirm to the vyakarana. regs, sriram , " Kumar Ramachandran " <kramach wrote: > > shrI gurubhyo namaH > shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH > > " The correct pAThA is 'mama Avaha " rather than " ma Avaha " . > > This is not in accordance with the most popular chantings and teachings > available nowadays. This is also not in accordance in the version taught to > me by the priest who used to come to our house. He was trained at Shankara > matham in Kanchipuram. Our ashram , based on our Guruji's teaching, also > chants it as " taam ma Avaha " . > > To me, the correct pATha is as it is taught by the Guru. > > Thanks. > shrI mAtre namaH > > _____ > > > > > . > > <http://geo./serv? s=97359714/grpId=1168176/grpspId=1705075991/msgId > =11770/stime=1234843077/nc1=1/nc2=2/nc3=3> > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 Dear Sriram  I have heard some pandits who hail from the SringerI peeTam chanting the srI sUktam and it is very similar to what is chanted by the kAnchi maTam pandits. ( well I havent noticed the minor differences like mama Avaha or ma Avaha etc,but their swarAs seem to sound very similar.)  You quote a lot from things followed at the sringeri peeTam. Would you still say that the pATha of the Kashmiri pandits is the original?  srI harI Gopi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 [Moderator's note: This message was marked as spam by . Please pay attention to all the text in your message. Do not BLINDLY copy what all was written previously in the thread. Quote only relevant portions. Avoid/delete any special unprintable characters.] shrI gurubhyo namaH shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH Not all Vedic grammar conforms to more modern Sanskrit grammar. Sometimes deviations are made for chhandas or other reasons. Not all of the teachings of the modern mathas conform to original Vedas. Even my Guruji or the Shankara Mathams, are not trying to change these methods of chanting, and accept them as correct. Thanks. KR shrI mAtre namaH _____ On Behalf Of sriram Tuesday, February 17, 2009 12:04 AM Re: correct pAThA of shrI sukta It is grammatically wrong and unfortunately most of the priests are teaching the wrong patha. This doesnot confirm to the vyakarana. regs, sriram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 shrI sukta pATha given out in manasatarangini is a wonderful original text. I am bewildered how this " learned friend " of mine as well as satish's got this manuscript. I showed this text to one of my friends Shri Avatar krishna Kaul, a kashmiri scholar in Hyderabad who is a direct disciple of Shri Lakshman Joo. Shri Kaul-ji confirmed the statement affirmatively. I am also working on some of the old manuscripts of srisukta and found variations in the text. Srisukta and Asyavamasya sukta are my two favourite suktas which i am seriously working on. It has been found that (even the observation of the learned friend) that in south india, the rg vedic suktas and mantras are chanted with yajurvedic tone in it which is quite wrong. The intonations should not be mixed up. As regards the 'mama " and " ma " avaha, the correct pAtha is " mama avaha " . This is correct grammatically and also metrically. I will detail out the vyakarana dosha probably in my next mail when i have time. regs, sriram , Gopi <antarurjas wrote: > > Dear Sriram > Â > I have heard some pandits who hail from the SringerI peeTam chanting the srI sUktam and it is very similar to what is chanted by the kAnchi maTam pandits. ( well I havent noticed the minor differences like mama Avaha or ma Avaha etc,but their swarAs seem to sound very similar.) > Â > You quote a lot from things followed at the sringeri peeTam. Would you still say that the pATha of the Kashmiri pandits is the original? > Â > srI harI > Gopi > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2009 Report Share Posted February 17, 2009 [Moderator's note: This message was marked as spam by . Please pay attention to all the text in your message. Do not BLINDLY copy what all was written previously in the thread. Quote only relevant portions] shrI gurubhyo namaH shrI mahagaNapataye namaH You are attempting to override the teachings of all the main mathams of southern India. Thanks. KR. shrI mAtre namaH _____ On Behalf Of sriram Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:03 AM Re: correct pAThA of shrI sukta shrI sukta pATha given out in manasatarangini is a wonderful original text. I am bewildered how this " learned friend " of mine as well as satish's got this manuscript. I showed this text to one of my friends Shri Avatar krishna Kaul, a kashmiri scholar in Hyderabad who is a direct disciple of Shri Lakshman Joo. Shri Kaul-ji confirmed the statement affirmatively. I am also working on some of the old manuscripts of srisukta and found variations in the text. Srisukta and Asyavamasya sukta are my two favourite suktas which i am seriously working on. It has been found that (even the observation of the learned friend) that in south india, the rg vedic suktas and mantras are chanted with yajurvedic tone in it which is quite wrong. The intonations should not be mixed up. As regards the 'mama " and " ma " avaha, the correct pAtha is " mama avaha " . This is correct grammatically and also metrically. I will detail out the vyakarana dosha probably in my next mail when i have time. regs, sriram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 22, 2009 Report Share Posted February 22, 2009 Dear Sriram ji, Thank you for this wonderful post. I have looked at several online sources for shrI suktam, but this one is very different - specially in the second half (phala shruti?). Here is another version which is my favourite. http://rapidshare.com201263621/Shri_Suktham_2.mp3.html , venkata sriram <sriram_sapthasathi wrote: > > The correct pAThA of shrI sukta in MP3 mode can be downloaded from the link given below. ASFIK, this is the correct rg veda pAThA chanted by Kashmiri pundits. >  > Also the PDF document is available with svarAs. >  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2009 Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 Here in South, people who are learning Yajurveda are mixing up the svaras of Yajurveda and Rg Veda. The parayana of Manyu Sukta is one such hotch potch. When it comes to the rk " vijeShakridindrAnavabravO asmAkam....bhavEha " , the real trouble starts with Yajurvedis who try to incoporate the yajurvedic swaras in Rg veda. Also, similarly, with Sushuma, IndrAgni, Vishwedevas, Nasadiya (which is also found in Udaka Shanti PaTha), Asyavamasya etc. Incidentally, the Durga Sukta pATha also have slight variations in mula pATha when observed in manuscripts. It has " bhUtvavita " instead of " bOdhyavita " in the rik " agne atrivan manasa...... " which is quite bewildering. BTW, thanks a lot for your good observation of srisukta. with regards, sriram , " Sunil Vakharia " <s_u_n_i_l_v wrote: > > Dear Sriram ji, > Thank you for this wonderful post. > > I have looked at several online sources for shrI suktam, but this one > is very different - specially in the second half (phala shruti?). > Here is another version which is my favourite. > > http://rapidshare.com201263621/Shri_Suktham_2.mp3.html > > > > > > , venkata sriram > <sriram_sapthasathi@> wrote: > > > > The correct pAThA of shrI sukta in MP3 mode can be downloaded from > the link given below. ASFIK, this is the correct rg veda pAThA > chanted by Kashmiri pundits. > >  > > Also the PDF document is available with svarAs. > >  > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2009 Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 Hi does any1 have the complete pAtha of SriSukta interspersed with Panchadashi either as just the sUktam or the nAmAvali as starting below? [Maya + Sri bijas].. HiranyavarNAm hariNIm .. kAmarAja kUta .. survaNaraja tasrajAm... madhya kUtam... chandrAm hiraNmayIm lakshmIm .. shakti kUtam... jAtavEdo ma Avaha... [sri + Maya bIjas Namah] ....... Thnx & Regs Ghanesh On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM, sriram <sriram_sapthasathiwrote: > Here in South, people who are learning Yajurveda are mixing up the > svaras of Yajurveda and Rg Veda. > > The parayana of Manyu Sukta is one such hotch potch. > > When it comes to the rk " vijeShakridindrAnavabravO > asmAkam....bhavEha " , the real trouble starts with Yajurvedis who try > to incoporate the yajurvedic swaras in Rg veda. > > Also, similarly, with Sushuma, IndrAgni, Vishwedevas, Nasadiya > (which is also found in Udaka Shanti PaTha), Asyavamasya etc. > > Incidentally, the Durga Sukta pATha also have slight variations in > mula pATha when observed in manuscripts. It has " bhUtvavita " instead > of " bOdhyavita " in the rik " agne atrivan manasa...... " which is > quite bewildering. > > BTW, thanks a lot for your good observation of srisukta. > > with regards, > sriram > > <%40>, " Sunil > Vakharia " <s_u_n_i_l_v > wrote: > > > > Dear Sriram ji, > > Thank you for this wonderful post. > > > > I have looked at several online sources for shrI suktam, but this > one > > is very different - specially in the second half (phala shruti?). > > Here is another version which is my favourite. > > > > http://rapidshare.com201263621/Shri_Suktham_2.mp3.html > > > > > > > > > > > > <%40>, venkata > sriram > > <sriram_sapthasathi@> wrote: > > > > > > The correct pAThA of shrI sukta in MP3 mode can be downloaded > from > > the link given below. ASFIK, this is the correct rg veda pAThA > > chanted by Kashmiri pundits. > > >  > > > Also the PDF document is available with svarAs. > > >  > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2009 Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 Sorry a small correction [Maya + Sri bijas].. HiranyavarNAm hariNIm .. VagbhavakUta kUta .. survaNaraja tasrajAm... kAmarAja kUtam... chandrAm hiraNmayIm lakshmIm .. shakti kUtam... jAtavEdo ma Avaha... [sri + Maya bIjas Namah] On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Ghanesh R.S. <ghanesh.rs wrote: > Hi does any1 have the complete pAtha of SriSukta interspersed with > Panchadashi either as just the sUktam or the nAmAvali as starting below? > > [Maya + Sri bijas].. HiranyavarNAm hariNIm .. kAmarAja kUta .. survaNaraja > tasrajAm... madhya kUtam... chandrAm hiraNmayIm lakshmIm .. shakti kUtam... > jAtavEdo ma Avaha... [sri + Maya bIjas Namah] > ...... > Thnx & Regs > Ghanesh > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:45 AM, sriram <sriram_sapthasathi > > wrote: > >> Here in South, people who are learning Yajurveda are mixing up the >> svaras of Yajurveda and Rg Veda. >> >> The parayana of Manyu Sukta is one such hotch potch. >> >> When it comes to the rk " vijeShakridindrAnavabravO >> asmAkam....bhavEha " , the real trouble starts with Yajurvedis who try >> to incoporate the yajurvedic swaras in Rg veda. >> >> Also, similarly, with Sushuma, IndrAgni, Vishwedevas, Nasadiya >> (which is also found in Udaka Shanti PaTha), Asyavamasya etc. >> >> Incidentally, the Durga Sukta pATha also have slight variations in >> mula pATha when observed in manuscripts. It has " bhUtvavita " instead >> of " bOdhyavita " in the rik " agne atrivan manasa...... " which is >> quite bewildering. >> >> BTW, thanks a lot for your good observation of srisukta. >> >> with regards, >> sriram >> >> <%40>, " Sunil >> Vakharia " <s_u_n_i_l_v >> wrote: >> > >> > Dear Sriram ji, >> > Thank you for this wonderful post. >> > >> > I have looked at several online sources for shrI suktam, but this >> one >> > is very different - specially in the second half (phala shruti?). >> > Here is another version which is my favourite. >> > >> > http://rapidshare.com201263621/Shri_Suktham_2.mp3.html >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <%40>, venkata >> sriram >> > <sriram_sapthasathi@> wrote: >> > > >> > > The correct pAThA of shrI sukta in MP3 mode can be downloaded >> from >> > the link given below. ASFIK, this is the correct rg veda pAThA >> > chanted by Kashmiri pundits. >> > >  >> > > Also the PDF document is available with svarAs. >> > >  >> > >> >> >> > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2009 Report Share Posted March 10, 2009 shrI gurubhyo namaH shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH Dear shrI Ghanesh: I have a copy of this which my parents and I have typeset in Sanskrit, for our book shrI vidya nityAnushThAna.m. However, please let me know if you are initiated into shrI vidyA, and more specifically, in panchadashI. If yes, I can send you a pdf copy (Sanskrit) separately. Please let me know. Thanks. shrI mAtre namaH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 I have srisuktam with the samputikaranam of panchadasi. If any one is interested I can upload the same. Regards, S.SHANGARANARAYANAN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 Respected Kumar, I have been initiated into Shodasi by H H Mahasannidhanam of Sringeri way bavck. Will be grateful if I could beblessed with a copy to my mailid . Namaskarams Ramanan ________________________________ Kumar Ramachandran <kramach Tuesday, 10 March, 2009 10:12:05 PM Re: correct pAThA of shrI sukta shrI gurubhyo namaH shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH Dear shrI Ghanesh: I have a copy of this which my parents and I have typeset in Sanskrit, for our book shrI vidya nityAnushThAna. m. However, please let me know if you are initiated into shrI vidyA, and more specifically, in panchadashI. If yes, I can send you a pdf copy (Sanskrit) separately. Please let me know. Thanks. shrI mAtre namaH Messages in this topic (12) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic Messages | Files | Photos | Links -- pradiipa-jvaalaabhir-divasakara-niiraajana-vidhiH sudhaasuutesh-candropala-jalalavair-arghya-racanaa . svakiiyair-ambhobhiH salila-nidhi-sauhityakaraNaM tvadiiyaabhir-vaagbhis-tava janani vaacaaM stutiriyam.h Web Page: http://www.ambaa.org/ Support: help Preferred Transliteration: http://www.aczoom.com/itrans/ Be informed, visit: http://www.kanchi-sathya.org/ Change settings via the Web ( ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional Visit Your Group | Terms of Use | Un Recent Activity * 2 New FilesVisit Your Group Give Back for Good Get inspired by a good cause. Y! Toolbar Get it Free! easy 1-click access to your groups. Start a group in 3 easy steps. Connect with others. .. __,_.._,___ Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help./l/in//mail/mail/tools/tools-08.html/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2009 Report Share Posted March 12, 2009 Dear Shri Kumar, Glad to know you have a copy of it. And Yes I have received purnabhisheka from his Holy Holiness my Gurunatha (late) Shri P. N. Narayana Shastrigal of chennai. I'd be very elated and grateful if you can send me the copy of the same. Thanks & Regs Ghanesh On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Kumar Ramachandran <kramachwrote: > shrI gurubhyo namaH > shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH > > Dear shrI Ghanesh: > > I have a copy of this which my parents and I have typeset in Sanskrit, for > our book shrI vidya nityAnushThAna.m. > > However, please let me know if you are initiated into shrI vidyA, and more > specifically, in panchadashI. If yes, I can send you a pdf copy (Sanskrit) > separately. > > Please let me know. > > Thanks. > > shrI mAtre namaH > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.