Guest guest Posted November 12, 2009 Report Share Posted November 12, 2009 Dear Members, A small piece of information i would like to share regarding the " Siva-Parvati Samvada " . All of our tantra sastra is compiled in the form of Dialogue between Siva and Parvati,where Parvati asks the questions and Siva answers them. One is surprised to see these dialogues and the questions of Parvati which seem as if Parvati is quite ignorant of sastra and illiterate in scriptures the way She asks the questions innocently. This seems ironical as both Siva & Sakti are Omniscient and are Sarvajna. Upon asking elders, this is the reply i have got. The Wisdom in Tantras are inaccessible to the student who does not serve his guru. Also, the Guru should not dissipate the knowledge to every tom, dick & harry and knowledge should not be given to *unasked* ie., " apAtrA dAna " . Hence, the intimacy of Guru-Sishya relationship is depicted with the relationship of Siva-Parvati who are though physically separate, are ONE ENTITY where Parvati enjoys the " half-part " of the Siva. The Love, affection that Parvati shows towards Siva shows that they are eternally united with each other. Similarly, the Guru & Sishya relationship in Tantra Sastra Adhyaya and Upasana. The qualities of Parvati (represents the stri dharma which ought to be the quality of Sishya) and Siva (represents the pati dharma or husband in the form of Guru) that are as follows: 1) Atma Samarpana The Sishya should offer himself entirely ie., Body, Mind & Intelligence to his Guru and should be humble in learning knowledge 2) The Stri (Women) conceives through her husband. After conceiving, the embryo that is born in the womb grows with the mother's nourishment. Similarly, the Sishya receives the diksha from his guru. THis act of initiation gives birth to Knowledge / Jnana in the Sishya which he should kindle it and nourish it with constant upasana. Thus, results in purnatva siddhi between Guru & Sishya like Siva & Parvati which is a a single entity though physically separate. regs, sriram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2009 Report Share Posted November 13, 2009 Dear sir, In my humble opinion any guru who is not capable of bestowing all the knowledge on a sishya who seeks solace in him, is considered not a worthy guru. This would mean that the guru has no capacity to transmit the divine energy to the seeker. Why should the Guru consider others as a " pasu " , he perhaps has no knowledge of the ultimate Divine nor has experience of the Divine energy. If any Guru has a real expereince of the Divine energy, He would never disregard any one however knowledgeable or not the seeker may be. Was not Kalidasa bestowed upon the Divine Mothers total grace and before that was he not an idiot? You say that the sishya should offer everything, but you do not mention about atmanivedhanam. Once a Guru offers his atma to the sishya through transmitting the divine energy both the guru and disciple becomes one. Then what and where is any difference between the guru and sishya. There is absolutely no obligation by either of them to the other. Many Gurus are highly possessive and do not want to part with their acquired divine energy, because they are afraid that such offering of divine energy would deminish their own status . They are totally power gross and should not be considered as a guru at all. This is purely my personal opinion and nothing has to do with any writings. Regards, S.SHANGARANARAYANAN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.