Guest guest Posted July 9, 2007 Report Share Posted July 9, 2007 NEW DELHI (July 6, 2007): When Pooja Chauhan stripped down to her underwear and walked the lanes of conservative Rajkot, she wanted to draw the attention of apathetic authorities. Little did she know that within the next 48 hours she would be known globally, symbolic of the thousands of Indian women who suffer the horrors that emanate from the greed of dowry-seekers. Only unlike many other women, the 22-year-old, decided to protest, stirring a storm in what was definitely larger than a tea cup. Letters of horror, of wonder, some queasy, some censorious are pouring in by the minute. Largely, Indians, Netizens from the world over are writing in to express their disgust at the treatment of women in Indian society. On a TimesofIndia.com debate asking whether Pooja was victim or culprit, 82% respondents wrote in favour of Pooja, hailing her as courageous and agreeing that the 22-year-old mother was a victim. But there was a not negligible 18% that felt she stepped the line by stepping out in public in her underwear. Of these most were people who sympathised with her, but thought the form of protest too extreme in the Indian context. Like Abhinav Chandra from Bangalore, who wrote that " The action was really extreme and the protest of such kinds may lead others to protest in this manner. " Rave Kumar from Pune said that although the action she took was too extreme, " It seems she was left with no other option. " Or Lokesh Pathak from Delhi who says: " Pooja might be a victim, but behaving like this in society is certainly not acceptable. You cannot do just anything to draw your attention. This act should be condemned. " Rishi from Boston agrees when he says: " It is ridiculous to brand her as a victim. Allegation of dowry is the fastest and surest way of getting back at the in-laws. " In fact, though an overwhelming number of people wrote words of sympathy and support for Pooja, when asked in the TimesofIndia.com poll -- " Was the Rajkot resident's semi-nude protest too extreme? " †" the ayes and nays were more even. For 40% respondents to the poll said " Yes " it was. And 57% said " No " , it wasn’t. A small three per cent did not wish to go either way. The protestations come mostly from men readers, while women seem to feel a kinship with Pooja. And many men too. Pooja has alleged that her husband and in-laws mistreated her and demanded more dowry. They also did not like the fact that she was bore a girl child. Debashis Bakshi from Patna strongly feels that " the husband and in-laws of this unfortunate woman should be punished so that no one can dare think of torturing women for dowry. " Hormaz Patel from Perth in Australia writes in to say, " Shame on the police and the society at large for pushing a person to such an extent. There is a law that protects the women from any sort of harassment and the police are to take immediate action. But I guess in a state like Gujarat, women are left to fend for themselves. Hang your heads in shame. " Hormaz' outburst is echoed by many other readers. And the police are the target of much of the ire for its apathy in case, which readers say is what led to Pooja’s unusual protest. Prashant from Pune feels that she " has a genuine reason behind this act and the police should have taken action. " From Singapore Rakesh Mahajan, says: " Our police have a very thick skin. They ignored Pooja earlier and hence she had to take such an extreme action. It's not her fault. " And Jaya, writing in from Bangalore says: " Only Pooja must have known what she was going through, it's very easy to comment. If she has gone to such an extent it only shows how corrupt our society is. What Indian culture are we talking about when men in senior positions and authority cannot take care of a woman who is being ill treated? " And then the echo that resonates through the many letters of outrage: " Shame on us. " Sympathising with her plight, Vikram from Chandigarh writes: " Pooja took this measure so that her voice is heard and now it seems that the police have finally woken up and taken her in-laws into custody. " The ordeal for Pooja is still not over as the police are planning to book her for " Indecent behaviour. " Anil Desai, from Mumbai, however, feels differently. He poses: " I would rather ask people to check whether she is mentally sound to take such drastic step. I totally agree that we need to look beyond nudity. But was it really needed? What made her to take this extreme step? " As though to counter his argument is one from Sanjay Kohli in London, who writes: " This is very similar to a scene in the movie Lage Raho Munna Bhai in which an old man removes most of his clothes to pay the bribe the official was demanding. The whole nation applauded the scene and appreciated the problem of bribery in our society. Therefore, Rajkot’s semi-nude protest should be seen in the same perspective. " More Gandhigiri. Ajay Bhutani from Canada congratulates Pooja and states: " Sixty years of freedom, economic growth envied by the rest of the world, India shining, yet we torture our women for dowry and bearing daughters. I think Gandhi ji would have heartily endorsed this non-violent protest. " While the appropriateness of Pooja's protest is still being debated, there is aspect that has almost universal agreement. That a husband who loved her and then married her and the in-laws, should be taken to task for driving Pooja to such extremes. Sajja from Uganda writes: " The husband and in-laws of this unfortunate woman should be punished so that no one can dare think of torturing women for dowry. My full sympathy is there with this unfortunate woman. " Tara Chopra writes from New York to say, " What was the Indian police doing all this time. Action should be taken against Pooja's despicable husband and in-laws as well as the police. Modi should make her the minister for women's welfare. " An emotional letter from Kiran Kumar, Jalandhar, who says evocatively: " A female is not a lottery ticket that you marry to win some money. We need to rever a lady. Stop this Durga Puja and Navratras if we cannot respect the living Goddess. " But a reader Sanjay Pandita would rather not join the chorus. He asks why the in-laws and husband were arrested on the complaint of someone who’s mental condition the same police are questioning. " The answer, " he says, " lies in our laws such as 498A, the Domestic Violence Act and Dowry Act. When it comes to cases under these well-intentioned, but highly misused laws, the police, as a matter of rule, arrest without bothering to check out the bona fide of the complainant, as they did in this case. God save Indian Family! " SOURCE: The Times of India. Pooja's plight evokes strong reactions 6 Jul 2007, 1856 hrs IST, INDIATIMES NEWS NETWORK. URL: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid- 2182798,prtpage-1.cms Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.