Hidden Truth of the TAJ MAHAL ... must read ...shocking

[Guest guest]

friends,

Shri Jaldhar. H Vyasji seems allergic to Stephen Knapps. here is an email which gives photos and evidence for the information of all.

regards

chetan

---------- Forwarded message ----------

 

 

 

 

Jayshree Nanik <nanikjSat, Aug 8, 2009 2:50 pmFW: Hidden Truth of the TAJ MAHAL ... must read ...shocking

 

 

 

 

       Hidden Truth of the TAJ MAHAL ... must read ...shocking……… 

 

    BBC says about Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth - Never say it is a Tomb

 Aerial view of the Taj Mahal

The interior water well  

 Frontal view of the Taj Mahal and dome  Close up of the dome with pinnacle

   Close up of the pinnacle

 

 Inlaid pinnacle pattern in courtyard  

 Red lotus at apex of the entrance

 Rear view of the Taj & 22 apartments

 View of sealed doors & windows in back

 Typical Vedic style corridors  

 The Music House--a contradiction  

 A locked room on upper floor  

 A marble apartment on ground floor  

 The OM in the flowers on the walls  

 Staircase that leads to the lower levels  

 300 foot long corridor inside apartments

 One of the 22 rooms in the secret lower level  

 Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms

 Interior of another of the locked rooms  

 Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room  

 Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks

 Secret walled door that leads to other rooms  

 Secret bricked door that hides more evidence

 Palace in Barhanpur where Mumtaz died  

 Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried  

 NOW READ THIS.......   No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the  whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says  the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of  Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from

 then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra  was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur

 still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for  surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a  burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.

  For example, Humayun, Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried  in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says   the term " Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim country

 from Afghanisthan to Algeria . " The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in at least two respects.   Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani, " he writes.

 Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's  name to derive the remainder as the name for the building. " Taj Mahal, he  claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak

 also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created  by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists . Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.

  Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates  Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by  Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a

 few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed  that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan  Albert Mandelslo, who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's

 death), describes the life of the city in his memoirs. But he makes no  reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an  English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the

 Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.   Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies  that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple

 rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj Mahal have remained sealed  since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak

 asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects  commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples . Fearing political  backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's book

 withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the  first edition dire consequences. There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak's research.   The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under

 U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.   Do circulate this to let others know about this reality.....      

  

 

 

   

         Forward the truth to as many as you can !

                  

 

 

       

  

  

--     AMARDEEP TONY SINGH    Pritam Group of Hotels,    Mumbai, INDIA.    -------

 

 

check out the rest of the Windows Live™. More than mail–Windows Live™ goes way beyond your inbox. More than messages =

 

 

 

From the hottest sporting action to the latest in news, style and entertainment, it’s all on MSN India

-- Chetan Merani " Society does not go down because of the activities of criminals, But because of the inactivities of the good people. " Swami Vivekananda

 

-- Chetan Merani " Society does not go down because of the activities of criminals, But because of the inactivities of the good people. " Swami Vivekananda

[Guest guest]

On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Chetan Merani wrote:

 

> Shri Jaldhar. H Vyasji seems allergic to Stephen Knapps.

 

Go back in the thread and see who is complaining about the

distortion of Hinduism by former Christian ISKCONites. Now all of a

sudden one of them is to be treated as an authority??? LOL

 

here is an email

> which gives photos and evidence for the information of all.

 

What you have managed to prove is that all religions are one in having a

number of crackpots in their ranks.

 

Now isn't there some Shaiva sahitya we could be discussing instead of this

silly topic?

 

 

--

Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar

[Guest guest]

--- On Sat, 8/22/09, Chetan Merani <cvmerani wrote:

Chetan Merani <cvmerani Fwd: Hidden Truth of the TAJ MAHAL ... must read ...shocking Date: Saturday, August 22, 2009, 12:12 PM

 

friends,

Shri Jaldhar. H Vyasji seems allergic to Stephen Knapps. here is an email which gives photos and evidence for the information of all.

regards

chetan

---------- Forwarded message ----------

 

 

 

 

Jayshree Nanik <nanikj (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>Sat, Aug 8, 2009 2:50 pmFW: Hidden Truth of the TAJ MAHAL ... must read ...shocking

 

 

Hidden Truth of the TAJ MAHAL ... must read ...shocking………

 

BBC says about Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth - Never say it is a Tomb Aerial view of the Taj Mahal The interior water well

Frontal view of the Taj Mahal and dome Close up of the dome with pinnacle Close up of the pinnacle Inlaid pinnacle pattern in courtyard Red lotus at apex of the entrance Rear view of the Taj & 22 apartments View of sealed doors &

windows in back Typical Vedic style corridors The Music House--a contradiction A locked room on upper floor A marble apartment on ground floor The OM in the flowers on the walls Staircase that leads to the lower levels 300 foot long corridor inside apartments One of the 22 rooms in the secret lower level Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms Interior of another of the locked rooms Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks Secret walled door that leads to other rooms Secret bricked door that hides more evidence Palace in Barhanpur where Mumtaz died Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried NOW READ THIS....... No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen

Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Humayun, Akbar,

Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term " Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim country from Afghanisthan to Algeria . "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in at least two respects. Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani," he writes. Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a

woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists . Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story. Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door

was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo, who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the city in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time. Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects

commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples . Fearing political backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences. There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak's research. The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate. Do circulate this to let others know about this reality.....

 

 

Forward the truth to as many as you can !

-- AMARDEEP TONY SINGH Pritam Group of Hotels, Mumbai, INDIA. ------------ --------- --------- --------- -

 

check out the rest of the Windows Live™. More than mail–Windows Live™ goes way beyond your inbox. More than messages =

 

 

 

From the hottest sporting action to the latest in news, style and entertainment, it’s all on MSN India

-- Chetan Merani"Society does not go down because of the activities of criminals, But because of the inactivities of the good people." Swami Vivekananda

-- Chetan Merani"Society does not go down because of the activities of criminals, But because of the inactivities of the good people." Swami Vivekananda