Guest guest Posted April 12, 2007 Report Share Posted April 12, 2007 I thought I would copy this here as well. I've copied his email to me first and my reply is below. Dear Surya ji,Yes, I agree that One Mukhi Round is more effective than any other one mukhi type. It is extremely rare, however does exist. Since it is not easily available, and not affordable, one can go for Sawar which is also from the same species i.e. Elaeocarpus angustifolius (= E. ganitrus and E.spharicus).Thanking you and with regards,Chandrashekhar Phadke Maharaj! One can go for anything, but it is not the same at all. I would go for a 14 muhki before the others. Sawar is nice, but being that it is one part of a GS bead, it just doesn't really pack the punch that one would look for in a 1 muhki bead. Its still nice, but not even close to the same. As far as I am concerned, there is NO substitute. But that is fine. One does not need a 1 muhki bead to go thru life joyfully and successfully. High quality diamonds are rare and not easily available or affordable, but still nothing compares to them for what they are used for. BOM MAHADEV! Surya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 Hi, I don't consider chandrakar or kaju shaped one mukhi as rudraksh at all. I consider one mukhi round one only as one mukhi rudraksh. Whatever available in the market is only I conside them as badraksh and people are cheating them by saying ek mukhi. Many websites mention that ek mukhi round one rudraksh is extremely rare and some sites say that it is a myth. At least I have seen 5 to 6 people wearing ek-mukhi round rudraksh malas( 54 +1 or 108+1). But the size of rudraksh is 4 to 5 mm radius and round one. All the people told me that wearing the mala , they got some benefits. I feel , ek mukhi will do benefit more spiritually than material benefits. If you have money you may get all 2 to 21 face rudraksh, but getting ek mukhi rudraksh, you should really lucky. Regards Durga sacred-objects , " Mahamuni Das " <mahamuni wrote: > > I thought I would copy this here as well. I've copied his email to me first and my reply is below. > > > Dear Surya ji, > > Yes, I agree that One Mukhi Round is more effective than any other one mukhi type. It is extremely rare, however does exist. Since it is not easily available, and not affordable, one can go for Sawar which is also from the same species i.e. Elaeocarpus angustifolius (= E. ganitrus and E.spharicus). > > Thanking you and with regards, > > Chandrashekhar Phadke > > Maharaj! > > One can go for anything, but it is not the same at all. I would go for a 14 muhki before the others. Sawar is nice, but being that it is one part of a GS bead, it just doesn't really pack the punch that one would look for in a 1 muhki bead. Its still nice, but not even close to the same. > > As far as I am concerned, there is NO substitute. But that is fine. One does not need a 1 muhki bead to go thru life joyfully and successfully. > > High quality diamonds are rare and not easily available or affordable, but still nothing compares to them for what they are used for. > > BOM MAHADEV! > > Surya > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2007 Report Share Posted April 13, 2007 You should be really lucky and in most cases, have a great deal of $$ as well! Surya - gdp231070 sacred-objects Friday, April 13, 2007 1:59 PM Re: more comments on 1 muhki rudraksha Hi,I don't consider chandrakar or kaju shaped one mukhi as rudraksh at all. I consider one mukhi round one only as one mukhi rudraksh. Whatever available in the market is only I conside them as badraksh and people are cheating them by saying ek mukhi.Many websites mention that ek mukhi round one rudraksh is extremely rare and some sites say that it is a myth. At least I have seen 5 to 6 people wearing ek-mukhi round rudraksh malas( 54 +1 or 108+1). But the size of rudraksh is 4 to 5 mm radius and round one. All the people told me that wearing the mala , they got some benefits. I feel , ek mukhi will do benefit more spiritually than material benefits. If you have money you may get all 2 to 21 face rudraksh, but getting ek mukhi rudraksh, you should really lucky.RegardsDurgasacred-objects , "Mahamuni Das" <mahamuni wrote:>> I thought I would copy this here as well. I've copied his email to me first and my reply is below.> > > Dear Surya ji,> > Yes, I agree that One Mukhi Round is more effective than any other one mukhi type. It is extremely rare, however does exist. Since it is not easily available, and not affordable, one can go for Sawar which is also from the same species i.e. Elaeocarpus angustifolius (= E. ganitrus and E.spharicus).> > Thanking you and with regards,> > Chandrashekhar Phadke> > Maharaj!> > One can go for anything, but it is not the same at all. I would go for a 14 muhki before the others. Sawar is nice, but being that it is one part of a GS bead, it just doesn't really pack the punch that one would look for in a 1 muhki bead. Its still nice, but not even close to the same. > > As far as I am concerned, there is NO substitute. But that is fine. One does not need a 1 muhki bead to go thru life joyfully and successfully.> > High quality diamonds are rare and not easily available or affordable, but still nothing compares to them for what they are used for.> > BOM MAHADEV!> > Surya> Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.4.0/759 - Release 4/12/2007 7:58 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2007 Report Share Posted April 15, 2007 dear friends there is only one type of rudraksha which is referred in ALL HOLY CLASSICS WHEREVER RUDRAKSHA IS MENTIONED and that is the ROUND SHAPED RUDRAKSHA. there is no need to ask 100 queries to know this simple truth that only the round rudraksha needs to be preferred. however, those who cannot afford the round rudraksha of some faces which are very expensive, they search for alternatives and get the alternatives. hence let us not find fault with those buyers of other shaped rudrakshas, as they are helpless and do not have the monies to buy the round rudrakshas. i dont even find fault with many rudraksha suppliers who are not able to offer the round one face or two face rudraksha because they dont have sufficinet monies to invest and maintain inventory of these highly expensive round rudrakshas. hence let us focus on knowledge sharing and throwing more light on the product rather than finding fault with the buyers or sellers. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun www.rudraksharemedy.com sacred-objects , " gdp231070 " <gdp231070 wrote: > > Hi, > > I don't consider chandrakar or kaju shaped one mukhi as rudraksh > at all. I consider one mukhi round one only as one mukhi > rudraksh. Whatever available in the market is only I conside them > as badraksh and people are cheating them by saying ek mukhi. > > Many websites mention that ek mukhi round one rudraksh is extremely > rare and some sites say that it is a myth. At least I have seen 5 to > 6 people wearing ek-mukhi round rudraksh malas( 54 +1 or 108+1). > But the size of rudraksh is 4 to 5 mm radius and round one. All the > people told me that wearing the mala , they got some benefits. > > I feel , ek mukhi will do benefit more spiritually than material > benefits. > > If you have money you may get all 2 to 21 face rudraksh, but getting > ek mukhi rudraksh, you should really lucky. > > Regards > Durga > > sacred-objects , " Mahamuni Das " <mahamuni@> > wrote: > > > > I thought I would copy this here as well. I've copied his email > to me first and my reply is below. > > > > > > Dear Surya ji, > > > > Yes, I agree that One Mukhi Round is more effective than any other > one mukhi type. It is extremely rare, however does exist. Since it > is not easily available, and not affordable, one can go for Sawar > which is also from the same species i.e. Elaeocarpus angustifolius > (= E. ganitrus and E.spharicus). > > > > Thanking you and with regards, > > > > Chandrashekhar Phadke > > > > Maharaj! > > > > One can go for anything, but it is not the same at all. I would > go for a 14 muhki before the others. Sawar is nice, but being that > it is one part of a GS bead, it just doesn't really pack the punch > that one would look for in a 1 muhki bead. Its still nice, but not > even close to the same. > > > > As far as I am concerned, there is NO substitute. But that is > fine. One does not need a 1 muhki bead to go thru life joyfully and > successfully. > > > > High quality diamonds are rare and not easily available or > affordable, but still nothing compares to them for what they are > used for. > > > > BOM MAHADEV! > > > > Surya > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.