Guest guest Posted November 13, 2007 Report Share Posted November 13, 2007 Hello Panditji, Laws are not necessarily inclusive but if you consider Snakes to be wild animals the entire interpretation will be very clear. A very good reason why the lawyer makes good money Well I am not that well versed with laws and definately dropped out of ICWAI but I did clear my Corporate Laws Paper. Hope you find the below extract interesting and I do welcome your comments on the same. Chapter I ***** (5) "captive animal" means any animal, specified in Schedule I, Schedule II, Schedule II or Schedule IV, which is captured or kept or bred in captivity; ***** Chapter III Section twelve. ********** 12. Grant of permit for special purposes. - Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this Act, it shall be lawful for the Chief Wild Life Warden, to grant (23)[***] a permit, by an order in writing stating the reasons therefor, to any person, on payment of such fee as may be prescribed, which shall entitle the holder of such permit to hunt subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, any wild animal specified in such permit, for the purpose of,_ (a) education;(24)[(b) scientific research; (bb) scientific Management. Explanation - For the purposes of clause (bb), the expression, "Scientific Management" means - translocation of any wild animal to an alternative suitable habitat; or population management of wildlife without killing or poisoning or destroying any wild animals; *********** Regarding protected species Schedule II part II *********** 11. Indian cobras (all sub-species belonging to genus Naja) *********** I dont know if you have google but I do assure you that the Indian Air Conditioned Elite do know how to use it very well and do understand Legal Language very well. For Your Kind Perusal Please Use The Below Link http://envfor.nic.in/legis/wildlife/wildlife1.html And please do send me some proof of killing and possessing of animal part and I assure you the gentleman will be visited by required officer. Mind you the Airconditioned Indian Elite will not be using influence but a very simple police complaint. Killing of any wild animal is prohibited. If killed for self defence which is lawfull the remains of the animal belong to the Govt. Chapter III Section 12 ********** 11. Hunting of Wild animals to be permitted in certain cases.– (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force and subject to the provisions of Chapter IV – (a) the Chief Wildlife Warden may, if he is satisfied that any wild animal specified in Sch. 1 has become dangerous to human life or is so disabled or diseased as to be beyond recovery, by order in writing and stating the reasons therefor, permit any person to hunt such animal or cause animal to be hunted; (b) the Chief Wildlife Warden or the authorised officer may, if he is satisfied that any wild animal specified in Sch. II Sch, III or Sch. IV has become dangerous to human life or to property (including standing crops on any land) or is so disabled or diseased as to be beyond recovery, by order in writing and stating the reasons therefor, permit any person to hunt such animal or cause such animal to be hunted. (2) The killing or wounding in good faith of any wild animal in defence of oneself or of any other person shall not be an offence; Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall exonerate any person who, when such defence becomes necessary, was committing any act in contravention of any provision of this Act or any rule or order made thereunder. (3) Any wild animal killed or wounded in defence of any person shall be Government property. ********** If the above is not very clear please let me know the next time you kill a wild animal for anything but self defence and we will let a court decide who is right. The Indian Airconditioned Psuedo Elite FYKI claims what they know. And by the way that Sharukh Khan adds example was way too lame He smokes in movies so do you encourage your children to smoke? Please do forgive my tone for I might have been a bit impolite disregarding your age and wisdom and I am way too drunk tonight. best regards, Jay panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote: dear friendinstead of referring the articles of third parties, i studied the indian wildlife protection act 1972 along with its amendments and nowhere i find snakecharming banned in india. if you give me the relvent chapters or schedules of this act where it mentions snakecharming banned in india, i would be grateful to you.snakecharmers have been hired by the government and were sent at government cost to various international cultural fairs abroad organised by the indian tourism ministry. even today several government tourism offices hire snakecharmers at their camps. all these are done officially.cobra is the snake which we are discussing in this thread. cobra is a normal snake according to indian wildlife act and its killing for self defence is not banned. trading the skin of only some rare snakes which are extinct or rarest in nature is banned but that does not apply surely to cobra which we are discussing.snakecharmers were unnecessarily branded bad by the elite airconditioned lifestyle animal lovers. last year hundreds of snakecharmers seized the assembly of orissa and left hundreds of snakes inside the assembly to highlight the harrassment meted out to them after which the government pronounced clearly that snakecharmers belong to an old traditional profession which will not be harrassed by the governemnt.if you still believe that snakecharming is banned, please mention the relevent clauses from the act and also mention why govenment is promoting snakecharming in its own fairs even today. if snakecharming is really banned in india, as you are claiming, crores of worth advertisement by pepsi with sharukh khan playing as a snakecharmer would have been banned.with best wishes and blessingspandit arjunwww.rudraksharemedy.comsacred-objects , Jay Munshi <jaymunshi wrote:>> Sir,> > FYKI Snake Charming is banned in India.> > http://www.wildlifesos.org/rprotect/snake_charm.htm> > As for keeping exotic animals as pets. For snakes you need a permit from the Wildlife Governing agency. I have had a very dear friend who now joined the Army but back in college was an active conservationist at one time had many snakes which he had rescued and which he would later release into wild.> > I am quite surprised to see how there is a lack of empathy for speechless animals. By far the most vicious animal on this planet is the Home Sapien > > > So is making monkeys and bears dance around.> > Best,> > Jay> > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote:> dear friends> > some mischief mongers and jealous amateurs try to plant myths to > scare the genuine customers from buying sacred objects from > trustworthy people like us.> > for example when i posted the photo of a genuine siyar singhi last > year, few people shouted selling banned animals product after which i > produced the relevent portions from the indian wildlife act excepting > vermin wherein this finds mention. similarly peacock feathers can > also be traded freely as they are not banned.> > there is no ban on killing or trading a snake or snake product. > snakecharming is a profession which is not banned. some snakes like > python are now reared as pets by some elite people. poison extracted > from snakes is purchased and used by various pharmaceutical > companies. in some northeastern states, snakes are displayed in > their restaurants where they are cooked and served. so selling a > snake or a part of a snake is not banned in india.> > with best wishes and blessings> pandit arjun> www.rudraksharemedy.com> > sacred-objects , Kochu Menon <kochu1@> wrote:> >> > another bunkum. There is no such ban. This is another myth > perpetrated by the fraudster to keep the gullible buyer from talking > about it till after he realises he was defrauded. Can anyone show the > notification? and pray, under what law is it banned?Menon> > > > > > sacred-objects@: rsbj66@: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:21:35 > +0000 Re: is this Real Naga Mani? photo > included> > > > > > > > > > Wow! Does the Govt of India recognize the existance of "Naga mani"? > Is Nagamani mentioned in Indian law? Wow!!!sacred-> objects , Ranganath P <askranga@> wrote:>> Hello> > > Original Naga Mani cant to Sold in Public, > Since it has been banned > by Govt. Of India.> > That means its clear that the items which are > Sale May not be Geniune or Original> > Regards> Ranganath> > International Business Partner> Bangalore> > Richard Shaw-Brown > <rsbj66@> wrote:> These are glass. Why not get the seller to provide > a gem certificate ruling out glass, known stones, or any other ID? > You cannot buy without guarantee and certificate. This is true even > with normal stones, what to speak of "naga mani." If they can't PROVE > it then they cannot sell it (except to an idiot). Y/s, Richard> > --- > In sacred-objects , "Raj" <raj_maiil@> wrote:> >> > > thanks for replying sir.i found it for sale.they claim to have > > > nagamanis of different types for example these are not transparent > > > so are they fake too?http://i19.tinypic.com/85nyz4n.jpg > > > http://i2.tinypic.com/6tfnvib.jpg http://i7.tinypic.com/71d09p1.jpg > > > they say its polished nagamani from cobra but cant believe them at > > > all as there are lots of fakes and nagamani is very difficult to > find> > sacred-objects , "Richard Shaw-Brown" > > > <rsbj66@> wrote:> > >> > > Sir, real Nagamani is not transparent. I > have tested this type. It > > is artificial glass. Y/s, Richard> > > > > > > sacred-objects , "Raj" <raj_maiil@> > wrote:> > > >> > > > Richard sir,> > > > can u please tell me whether > this is a real nagamani-> > > > http://i10.tinypic.com/85vxpbb.jpg> > > > > there are lots of fake nagamanis around...but,someone told me > > > that> > > > this is a real nagamani please confirm sir.> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > Do > You ?> Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________> > Check out some new online services at Windows Live Ideas—so new > they haven't even been officially released yet.> > http://www.msnspecials.in/windowslive/> >> > > > > > > > Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Mail. See how.> Never miss a thing. Make your homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2007 Report Share Posted November 13, 2007 you are right,does nagamani really have the powers or is it mere imagination and myth?some say that after getting nagamani they got good fortune and luck in the form of good job and happiness maybe its just a coincidence or does the mani really have powers?if so why didnt the snake charmers become rich because they have seen hundreds of snakes and never found a mani?they always lead a poor life and never got lucky.maybe only some have nagamani in their destiny only some can find it...but how can we believe something without seeing it with naked eyes?...maybe coz its very rare still its sometimes hard to believe...we have just seen it in indian movies about ichaadari naag and naagin with nagamani with supernatural powers with no limitations.still its very mysterious and interesting how i wish we could find more about it. sacred-objects , Kochu Menon <kochu1 wrote: > > > my mother's elder sister has a " Nelmaanikyam " which is a pinkish ruby shaped like a rice grain. It was in the treasury of a rich ancient family and it is credited with lots of powers. It was sold to her husband by an alcoholic in the family for 400 rupees in the 50s. > The question I asked was if it brings so many boons why was it sold? > anyway my aunt's husband rose in civil service but was suspended on trumped up charges - like he did not attend a meeting to set up civil defence in Kerala (during the 1962 conflict) while he was attending a similar meeting in Delhi etc. He fought cases but died afterin a tragic accident and was reinstated after his death. The aunt suffered a lot because of a shizoid son and daughter. > Whats the moral of the story?Menon > > > sacred-objects: panditarjun2004: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:51:43 +0000 Re: is this Real Naga Mani? photo included > > > > > dear friendinstead of referring the articles of third parties, i studied the indian wildlife protection act 1972 along with its amendments and nowhere i find snakecharming banned in india. if you give me the relvent chapters or schedules of this act where it mentions snakecharming banned in india, i would be grateful to you.snakecharmers have been hired by the government and were sent at government cost to various international cultural fairs abroad organised by the indian tourism ministry. even today several government tourism offices hire snakecharmers at their camps. all these are done officially.cobra is the snake which we are discussing in this thread. cobra is a normal snake according to indian wildlife act and its killing for self defence is not banned. trading the skin of only some rare snakes which are extinct or rarest in nature is banned but that does not apply surely to cobra which we are discussing.snakecharmers were unnecessarily branded bad by the elite airconditioned lifestyle animal lovers. last year hundreds of snakecharmers seized the assembly of orissa and left hundreds of snakes inside the assembly to highlight the harrassment meted out to them after which the government pronounced clearly that snakecharmers belong to an old traditional profession which will not be harrassed by the governemnt.if you still believe that snakecharming is banned, please mention the relevent clauses from the act and also mention why govenment is promoting snakecharming in its own fairs even today. if snakecharming is really banned in india, as you are claiming, crores of worth advertisement by pepsi with sharukh khan playing as a snakecharmer would have been banned.with best wishes and blessingspandit arjunwww.rudraksharemedy.com--- In sacred-objects , Jay Munshi <jaymunshi@> wrote:>> Sir,> > FYKI Snake Charming is banned in India.> > http://www.wildlifesos.org/rprotect/snake_charm.htm> > As for keeping exotic animals as pets. For snakes you need a permit from the Wildlife Governing agency. I have had a very dear friend who now joined the Army but back in college was an active conservationist at one time had many snakes which he had rescued and which he would later release into wild.> > I am quite surprised to see how there is a lack of empathy for speechless animals. By far the most vicious animal on this planet is the Home Sapien > > > So is making monkeys and bears dance around.> > Best,> > Jay> > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@> wrote:> dear friends> > some mischief mongers and jealous amateurs try to plant myths to > scare the genuine customers from buying sacred objects from > trustworthy people like us.> > for example when i posted the photo of a genuine siyar singhi last > year, few people shouted selling banned animals product after which i > produced the relevent portions from the indian wildlife act excepting > vermin wherein this finds mention. similarly peacock feathers can > also be traded freely as they are not banned.> > there is no ban on killing or trading a snake or snake product. > snakecharming is a profession which is not banned. some snakes like > python are now reared as pets by some elite people. poison extracted > from snakes is purchased and used by various pharmaceutical > companies. in some northeastern states, snakes are displayed in > their restaurants where they are cooked and served. so selling a > snake or a part of a snake is not banned in india.> > with best wishes and blessings> pandit arjun> www.rudraksharemedy.com> > sacred-objects , Kochu Menon <kochu1@> wrote:> >> > another bunkum. There is no such ban. This is another myth > perpetrated by the fraudster to keep the gullible buyer from talking > about it till after he realises he was defrauded. Can anyone show the > notification? and pray, under what law is it banned?Menon> > > > > > sacred-objects@: rsbj66@: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:21:35 > +0000 Re: is this Real Naga Mani? photo > included> > > > > > > > > > Wow! Does the Govt of India recognize the existance of " Naga mani " ? > Is Nagamani mentioned in Indian law? Wow!!!sacred-> objects , Ranganath P <askranga@> wrote:>> Hello> > > Original Naga Mani cant to Sold in Public, > Since it has been banned > by Govt. Of India.> > That means its clear that the items which are > Sale May not be Geniune or Original> > Regards> Ranganath> > International Business Partner> Bangalore> > Richard Shaw-Brown > <rsbj66@> wrote:> These are glass. Why not get the seller to provide > a gem certificate ruling out glass, known stones, or any other ID? > You cannot buy without guarantee and certificate. This is true even > with normal stones, what to speak of " naga mani. " If they can't PROVE > it then they cannot sell it (except to an idiot). Y/s, Richard> > --- > In sacred-objects , " Raj " <raj_maiil@> wrote:> >> > > thanks for replying sir.i found it for sale.they claim to have > > > nagamanis of different types for example these are not transparent > > > so are they fake too?http://i19.tinypic.com/85nyz4n.jpg > > > http://i2.tinypic.com/6tfnvib.jpg http://i7.tinypic.com/71d09p1.jpg > > > they say its polished nagamani from cobra but cant believe them at > > > all as there are lots of fakes and nagamani is very difficult to > find> > sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw-Brown " > > > <rsbj66@> wrote:> > >> > > Sir, real Nagamani is not transparent. I > have tested this type. It > > is artificial glass. Y/s, Richard> > > > > > > sacred-objects , " Raj " <raj_maiil@> > wrote:> > > >> > > > Richard sir,> > > > can u please tell me whether > this is a real nagamani-> > > > http://i10.tinypic.com/85vxpbb.jpg> > > > > there are lots of fake nagamanis around...but,someone told me > > > that> > > > this is a real nagamani please confirm sir.> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > Do > You ?> Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________> > Check out some new online services at Windows Live Ideas—so new > they haven't even been officially released yet.> > http://www.msnspecials.in/windowslive/> >> > > > > > > > Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Mail. See how.> _______________ > Call friends with PC-to-PC calling -- FREE > http://get.live.com/messenger/overview > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2007 Report Share Posted November 13, 2007 Real Lakshmi Shank (not whelk) or real Nagamani (not glass) have REAL powers, according to Shastra. We already have seen that about 95% of Lakshmi Shank owners are bogus. So I would assume 99% of Nagamani owners are bogus. We must be lucky in the first place before good karma shows it's shining face. Even if a Lakshma Shank can bring wealth, yet, getting that shank and that wealth are all simply prarabdha punya karma fruits. Agna Purnanam calls good gems an " escort " of good luck, not the cause of it. Karma is karma. And it takes good karma to get a real Nagamani. Why snake charmers are not rich. Actually, is Nagamani known for giving riches, like Kuvera or Smt Lakshmi devi? The snake charmers will get rich if they can sell a real Nagamani for a crore. Why don't the astrologers & mystics win the lottery? Best wishes, Richard sacred-objects , " Raj " <raj_maiil wrote: > > you are right,does nagamani really have the powers or is it mere > imagination and myth?some say that after getting nagamani they got > good fortune and luck in the form of good job and happiness maybe its > just a coincidence or does the mani really have powers?if so why didnt > the snake charmers become rich because they have seen hundreds of > snakes and never found a mani?they always lead a poor life and never > got lucky.maybe only some have nagamani in their destiny only some can > find it...but how can we believe something without seeing it with > naked eyes?...maybe coz its very rare still its sometimes hard to > believe...we have just seen it in indian movies about ichaadari naag > and naagin with nagamani with supernatural powers with no > limitations.still its very mysterious and interesting how i wish we > could find more about it. > sacred-objects , Kochu Menon <kochu1@> wrote: > > > > > > my mother's elder sister has a " Nelmaanikyam " which is a pinkish > ruby shaped like a rice grain. It was in the treasury of a rich > ancient family and it is credited with lots of powers. It was sold to > her husband by an alcoholic in the family for 400 rupees in the 50s. > > The question I asked was if it brings so many boons why was it sold? > > anyway my aunt's husband rose in civil service but was suspended on > trumped up charges - like he did not attend a meeting to set up civil > defence in Kerala (during the 1962 conflict) while he was attending a > similar meeting in Delhi etc. He fought cases but died afterin a > tragic accident and was reinstated after his death. The aunt suffered > a lot because of a shizoid son and daughter. > > Whats the moral of the story?Menon > > > > > > sacred-objects@: panditarjun2004@: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 > 15:51:43 +0000 Re: is this Real Naga Mani? > photo included > > > > > > > > > > dear friendinstead of referring the articles of third parties, i > studied the indian wildlife protection act 1972 along with its > amendments and nowhere i find snakecharming banned in india. if you > give me the relvent chapters or schedules of this act where it > mentions snakecharming banned in india, i would be grateful to > you.snakecharmers have been hired by the government and were sent at > government cost to various international cultural fairs abroad > organised by the indian tourism ministry. even today several > government tourism offices hire snakecharmers at their camps. all > these are done officially.cobra is the snake which we are discussing > in this thread. cobra is a normal snake according to indian wildlife > act and its killing for self defence is not banned. trading the skin > of only some rare snakes which are extinct or rarest in nature is > banned but that does not apply surely to cobra which we are > discussing.snakecharmers were unnecessarily branded bad by the elite > airconditioned lifestyle animal lovers. last year hundreds of > snakecharmers seized the assembly of orissa and left hundreds of > snakes inside the assembly to highlight the harrassment meted out to > them after which the government pronounced clearly that snakecharmers > belong to an old traditional profession which will not be harrassed by > the governemnt.if you still believe that snakecharming is banned, > please mention the relevent clauses from the act and also mention why > govenment is promoting snakecharming in its own fairs even today. if > snakecharming is really banned in india, as you are claiming, crores > of worth advertisement by pepsi with sharukh khan playing as a > snakecharmer would have been banned.with best wishes and > blessingspandit arjunwww.rudraksharemedy.com--- In > sacred-objects , Jay Munshi <jaymunshi@> wrote:>> Sir,> > > FYKI Snake Charming is banned in India.> > > http://www.wildlifesos.org/rprotect/snake_charm.htm> > As for keeping > exotic animals as pets. For snakes you need a permit from the Wildlife > Governing agency. I have had a very dear friend who now joined the > Army but back in college was an active conservationist at one time had > many snakes which he had rescued and which he would later release into > wild.> > I am quite surprised to see how there is a lack of empathy > for speechless animals. By far the most vicious animal on this planet > is the Home Sapien > > > So is making monkeys and bears dance around.> > > Best,> > Jay> > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@> wrote:> dear > friends> > some mischief mongers and jealous amateurs try to plant > myths to > scare the genuine customers from buying sacred objects from > > trustworthy people like us.> > for example when i posted the photo > of a genuine siyar singhi last > year, few people shouted selling > banned animals product after which i > produced the relevent portions > from the indian wildlife act excepting > vermin wherein this finds > mention. similarly peacock feathers can > also be traded freely as > they are not banned.> > there is no ban on killing or trading a snake > or snake product. > snakecharming is a profession which is not banned. > some snakes like > python are now reared as pets by some elite people. > poison extracted > from snakes is purchased and used by various > pharmaceutical > companies. in some northeastern states, snakes are > displayed in > their restaurants where they are cooked and served. so > selling a > snake or a part of a snake is not banned in india.> > with > best wishes and blessings> pandit arjun> www.rudraksharemedy.com> > > sacred-objects , Kochu Menon <kochu1@> wrote:> > >> > another bunkum. There is no such ban. This is another myth > > perpetrated by the fraudster to keep the gullible buyer from talking > > about it till after he realises he was defrauded. Can anyone show the > > notification? and pray, under what law is it banned?Menon> > > > > > > sacred-objects@: rsbj66@: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:21:35 > > +0000 Re: is this Real Naga Mani? photo > > included> > > > > > > > > > Wow! Does the Govt of India recognize the > existance of " Naga mani " ? > Is Nagamani mentioned in Indian law? > Wow!!!sacred-> objects , Ranganath P <askranga@> > wrote:>> Hello> > > Original Naga Mani cant to Sold in Public, > Since > it has been banned > by Govt. Of India.> > That means its clear that > the items which are > Sale May not be Geniune or Original> > Regards> > Ranganath> > International Business Partner> Bangalore> > Richard > Shaw-Brown > <rsbj66@> wrote:> These are glass. Why not get the seller > to provide > a gem certificate ruling out glass, known stones, or any > other ID? > You cannot buy without guarantee and certificate. This is > true even > with normal stones, what to speak of " naga mani. " If they > can't PROVE > it then they cannot sell it (except to an idiot). Y/s, > Richard> > --- > In sacred-objects , " Raj " <raj_maiil@> > wrote:> >> > > thanks for replying sir.i found it for sale.they claim > to have > > > nagamanis of different types for example these are not > transparent > > > so are they fake > too?http://i19.tinypic.com/85nyz4n.jpg > > > > http://i2.tinypic.com/6tfnvib.jpg http://i7.tinypic.com/71d09p1.jpg > > > > they say its polished nagamani from cobra but cant believe them at > > > > all as there are lots of fakes and nagamani is very difficult to > > find> > sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw-Brown " > > > > <rsbj66@> wrote:> > >> > > Sir, real Nagamani is not > transparent. I > have tested this type. It > > is artificial glass. > Y/s, Richard> > > > > > > sacred-objects , " Raj " > <raj_maiil@> > wrote:> > > >> > > > Richard sir,> > > > can u please > tell me whether > this is a real nagamani-> > > > > http://i10.tinypic.com/85vxpbb.jpg> > > > > there are lots of fake > nagamanis around...but,someone told me > > > that> > > > this is a > real nagamani please confirm sir.> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > Do > You ?> > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________> > Check > out some new online services at Windows Live Ideas—so new > they > haven't even been officially released yet.> > > http://www.msnspecials.in/windowslive/> >> > > > > > > > > Be a better pen pal. Text or chat > with friends inside Mail. See how.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________ > > Call friends with PC-to-PC calling -- FREE > > http://get.live.com/messenger/overview > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2007 Report Share Posted November 13, 2007 sir,they say that installing the nagamani in ur house gives u good fortune...if so why dont the snake charmers install it in their houses as they have a good chance of finding a mani?then they will get lucky...i know that nagamani exists but its still a mystery whether it has the powers as only a few people have it maybe it does sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw-Brown " <rsbj66 wrote: > > Real Lakshmi Shank (not whelk) or real Nagamani (not glass) have REAL powers, according to Shastra. We already have seen that about 95% of Lakshmi Shank owners are bogus. So I would assume 99% of Nagamani owners are bogus. > > We must be lucky in the first place before good karma shows it's shining face. Even if a Lakshma Shank can bring wealth, yet, getting that shank and that wealth are all simply prarabdha punya karma fruits. Agna Purnanam calls good gems an " escort " of good luck, not the cause of it. Karma is karma. And it takes good karma to get a real Nagamani. > > Why snake charmers are not rich. Actually, is Nagamani known for giving riches, like Kuvera or Smt Lakshmi devi? The snake charmers will get rich if they can sell a real Nagamani for a crore. > > Why don't the astrologers & mystics win the lottery? > > Best wishes, > Richard > > sacred-objects , " Raj " <raj_maiil@> wrote: > > > > you are right,does nagamani really have the powers or is it mere > > imagination and myth?some say that after getting nagamani they got > > good fortune and luck in the form of good job and happiness maybe its > > just a coincidence or does the mani really have powers?if so why didnt > > the snake charmers become rich because they have seen hundreds of > > snakes and never found a mani?they always lead a poor life and never > > got lucky.maybe only some have nagamani in their destiny only some can > > find it...but how can we believe something without seeing it with > > naked eyes?...maybe coz its very rare still its sometimes hard to > > believe...we have just seen it in indian movies about ichaadari naag > > and naagin with nagamani with supernatural powers with no > > limitations.still its very mysterious and interesting how i wish we > > could find more about it. > > sacred-objects , Kochu Menon <kochu1@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > my mother's elder sister has a " Nelmaanikyam " which is a pinkish > > ruby shaped like a rice grain. It was in the treasury of a rich > > ancient family and it is credited with lots of powers. It was sold to > > her husband by an alcoholic in the family for 400 rupees in the 50s. > > > The question I asked was if it brings so many boons why was it sold? > > > anyway my aunt's husband rose in civil service but was suspended on > > trumped up charges - like he did not attend a meeting to set up civil > > defence in Kerala (during the 1962 conflict) while he was attending a > > similar meeting in Delhi etc. He fought cases but died afterin a > > tragic accident and was reinstated after his death. The aunt suffered > > a lot because of a shizoid son and daughter. > > > Whats the moral of the story?Menon > > > > > > > > > sacred-objects@: panditarjun2004@: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 > > 15:51:43 +0000 Re: is this Real Naga Mani? > > photo included > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dear friendinstead of referring the articles of third parties, i > > studied the indian wildlife protection act 1972 along with its > > amendments and nowhere i find snakecharming banned in india. if you > > give me the relvent chapters or schedules of this act where it > > mentions snakecharming banned in india, i would be grateful to > > you.snakecharmers have been hired by the government and were sent at > > government cost to various international cultural fairs abroad > > organised by the indian tourism ministry. even today several > > government tourism offices hire snakecharmers at their camps. all > > these are done officially.cobra is the snake which we are discussing > > in this thread. cobra is a normal snake according to indian wildlife > > act and its killing for self defence is not banned. trading the skin > > of only some rare snakes which are extinct or rarest in nature is > > banned but that does not apply surely to cobra which we are > > discussing.snakecharmers were unnecessarily branded bad by the elite > > airconditioned lifestyle animal lovers. last year hundreds of > > snakecharmers seized the assembly of orissa and left hundreds of > > snakes inside the assembly to highlight the harrassment meted out to > > them after which the government pronounced clearly that snakecharmers > > belong to an old traditional profession which will not be harrassed by > > the governemnt.if you still believe that snakecharming is banned, > > please mention the relevent clauses from the act and also mention why > > govenment is promoting snakecharming in its own fairs even today. if > > snakecharming is really banned in india, as you are claiming, crores > > of worth advertisement by pepsi with sharukh khan playing as a > > snakecharmer would have been banned.with best wishes and > > blessingspandit arjunwww.rudraksharemedy.com--- In > > sacred-objects , Jay Munshi <jaymunshi@> wrote:>> Sir,> > > > FYKI Snake Charming is banned in India.> > > > http://www.wildlifesos.org/rprotect/snake_charm.htm> > As for keeping > > exotic animals as pets. For snakes you need a permit from the Wildlife > > Governing agency. I have had a very dear friend who now joined the > > Army but back in college was an active conservationist at one time had > > many snakes which he had rescued and which he would later release into > > wild.> > I am quite surprised to see how there is a lack of empathy > > for speechless animals. By far the most vicious animal on this planet > > is the Home Sapien > > > So is making monkeys and bears dance around.> > > > Best,> > Jay> > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@> wrote:> dear > > friends> > some mischief mongers and jealous amateurs try to plant > > myths to > scare the genuine customers from buying sacred objects from > > > trustworthy people like us.> > for example when i posted the photo > > of a genuine siyar singhi last > year, few people shouted selling > > banned animals product after which i > produced the relevent portions > > from the indian wildlife act excepting > vermin wherein this finds > > mention. similarly peacock feathers can > also be traded freely as > > they are not banned.> > there is no ban on killing or trading a snake > > or snake product. > snakecharming is a profession which is not banned. > > some snakes like > python are now reared as pets by some elite people. > > poison extracted > from snakes is purchased and used by various > > pharmaceutical > companies. in some northeastern states, snakes are > > displayed in > their restaurants where they are cooked and served. so > > selling a > snake or a part of a snake is not banned in india.> > with > > best wishes and blessings> pandit arjun> www.rudraksharemedy.com> > > > sacred-objects , Kochu Menon <kochu1@> wrote:> > > >> > another bunkum. There is no such ban. This is another myth > > > perpetrated by the fraudster to keep the gullible buyer from talking > > > about it till after he realises he was defrauded. Can anyone show the > > > notification? and pray, under what law is it banned?Menon> > > > > > > > sacred-objects@: rsbj66@: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:21:35 > > > +0000 Re: is this Real Naga Mani? photo > > > included> > > > > > > > > > Wow! Does the Govt of India recognize the > > existance of " Naga mani " ? > Is Nagamani mentioned in Indian law? > > Wow!!!sacred-> objects , Ranganath P <askranga@> > > wrote:>> Hello> > > Original Naga Mani cant to Sold in Public, > Since > > it has been banned > by Govt. Of India.> > That means its clear that > > the items which are > Sale May not be Geniune or Original> > Regards> > > Ranganath> > International Business Partner> Bangalore> > Richard > > Shaw-Brown > <rsbj66@> wrote:> These are glass. Why not get the seller > > to provide > a gem certificate ruling out glass, known stones, or any > > other ID? > You cannot buy without guarantee and certificate. This is > > true even > with normal stones, what to speak of " naga mani. " If they > > can't PROVE > it then they cannot sell it (except to an idiot). Y/s, > > Richard> > --- > In sacred-objects , " Raj " <raj_maiil@> > > wrote:> >> > > thanks for replying sir.i found it for sale.they claim > > to have > > > nagamanis of different types for example these are not > > transparent > > > so are they fake > > too?http://i19.tinypic.com/85nyz4n.jpg > > > > > http://i2.tinypic.com/6tfnvib.jpg http://i7.tinypic.com/71d09p1.jpg > > > > > they say its polished nagamani from cobra but cant believe them at > > > > > all as there are lots of fakes and nagamani is very difficult to > > > find> > sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw-Brown " > > > > > <rsbj66@> wrote:> > >> > > Sir, real Nagamani is not > > transparent. I > have tested this type. It > > is artificial glass. > > Y/s, Richard> > > > > > > sacred-objects , " Raj " > > <raj_maiil@> > wrote:> > > >> > > > Richard sir,> > > > can u please > > tell me whether > this is a real nagamani-> > > > > > http://i10.tinypic.com/85vxpbb.jpg> > > > > there are lots of fake > > nagamanis around...but,someone told me > > > that> > > > this is a > > real nagamani please confirm sir.> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > Do > You ?> > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________> > Check > > out some new online services at Windows Live Ideas—so new > they > > haven't even been officially released yet.> > > > http://www.msnspecials.in/windowslive/> >> > > > > > > > > > Be a better pen pal. Text or chat > > with friends inside Mail. See how.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________ > > > Call friends with PC-to-PC calling -- FREE > > > http://get.live.com/messenger/overview > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2007 Report Share Posted November 14, 2007 dear friend the mails written by me were highlighting how the indian government itself is hiring snakecharmers and using snakecharmers in their tourism ministry organised cultural fairs, especially in rajasthan. the government will not do so if the laws you are understanding are against it. however, your language is not good as you are remarking " next time you kill a snake " which is a way too personal. please desist from making personal remarks in an offensive posture. with best wishes and blessings pandit arjun www.rudraksharemedy.com sacred-objects , Jay Munshi <jaymunshi wrote: > > Hello Panditji, > > Laws are not necessarily inclusive but if you consider Snakes to be wild animals the entire interpretation will be very clear. A very good reason why the lawyer makes good money > > Well I am not that well versed with laws and definately dropped out of ICWAI but I did clear my Corporate Laws Paper. Hope you find the below extract interesting and I do welcome your comments on the same. > > Chapter I > > ***** > (5) " captive animal " means any animal, specified in Schedule I, Schedule II, Schedule II or Schedule IV, which is captured or kept or bred in captivity; > ***** > > Chapter III Section twelve. > ********** > 12. Grant of permit for special purposes. - Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this Act, it shall be lawful for the Chief Wild Life Warden, to grant (23)[***] a permit, by an order in writing stating the reasons therefor, to any person, on payment of such fee as may be prescribed, which shall entitle the holder of such permit to hunt subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, any wild animal specified in such permit, for the purpose of,_ > (a) education;(24)[(b) scientific research; > (bb) scientific Management. > Explanation - For the purposes of clause (bb), the expression, " Scientific Management " means - > > translocation of any wild animal to an alternative suitable habitat; or > population management of wildlife without killing or poisoning or destroying any wild animals; > *********** > > Regarding protected species Schedule II part II > > *********** > 11. Indian cobras (all sub-species belonging to genus Naja) > *********** > > > I dont know if you have google but I do assure you that the Indian Air Conditioned Elite do know how to use it very well and do understand Legal Language very well. > > For Your Kind Perusal Please Use The Below Link > http://envfor.nic.in/legis/wildlife/wildlife1.html > > And please do send me some proof of killing and possessing of animal part and I assure you the gentleman will be visited by required officer. Mind you the Airconditioned Indian Elite will not be using influence but a very simple police complaint. > > Killing of any wild animal is prohibited. If killed for self defence which is lawfull the remains of the animal belong to the Govt. > > Chapter III Section 12 > > ********** > 11. Hunting of Wild animals to be permitted in certain cases.– (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force and subject to the provisions of Chapter IV – > (a) the Chief Wildlife Warden may, if he is satisfied that any wild animal specified in Sch. 1 has become dangerous to human life or is so disabled or diseased as to be beyond recovery, by order in writing and stating the reasons therefor, permit any person to hunt such animal or cause animal to be hunted; > (b) the Chief Wildlife Warden or the authorised officer may, if he is satisfied that any wild animal specified in Sch. II Sch, III or Sch. IV has become dangerous to human life or to property (including standing crops on any land) or is so disabled or diseased as to be beyond recovery, by order in writing and stating the reasons therefor, permit any person to hunt such animal or cause such animal to be hunted. > (2) The killing or wounding in good faith of any wild animal in defence of oneself or of any other person shall not be an offence; > Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall exonerate any person who, when such defence becomes necessary, was committing any act in contravention of any provision of this Act or any rule or order made thereunder. > (3) Any wild animal killed or wounded in defence of any person shall be Government property. > ********** > > If the above is not very clear please let me know the next time you kill a wild animal for anything but self defence and we will let a court decide who is right. > > The Indian Airconditioned Psuedo Elite FYKI claims what they know. > > And by the way that Sharukh Khan adds example was way too lame He smokes in movies so do you encourage your children to smoke? > > Please do forgive my tone for I might have been a bit impolite disregarding your age and wisdom and I am way too drunk tonight. > > best regards, > > Jay > > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote: > dear friend > > instead of referring the articles of third parties, i studied the > indian wildlife protection act 1972 along with its amendments and > nowhere i find snakecharming banned in india. if you give me the > relvent chapters or schedules of this act where it mentions > snakecharming banned in india, i would be grateful to you. > > snakecharmers have been hired by the government and were sent at > government cost to various international cultural fairs abroad > organised by the indian tourism ministry. even today several > government tourism offices hire snakecharmers at their camps. all > these are done officially. > > cobra is the snake which we are discussing in this thread. cobra is > a normal snake according to indian wildlife act and its killing for > self defence is not banned. trading the skin of only some rare > snakes which are extinct or rarest in nature is banned but that does > not apply surely to cobra which we are discussing. > > snakecharmers were unnecessarily branded bad by the elite > airconditioned lifestyle animal lovers. last year hundreds of > snakecharmers seized the assembly of orissa and left hundreds of > snakes inside the assembly to highlight the harrassment meted out to > them after which the government pronounced clearly that snakecharmers > belong to an old traditional profession which will not be harrassed > by the governemnt. > > if you still believe that snakecharming is banned, please mention the > relevent clauses from the act and also mention why govenment is > promoting snakecharming in its own fairs even today. if > snakecharming is really banned in india, as you are claiming, crores > of worth advertisement by pepsi with sharukh khan playing as a > snakecharmer would have been banned. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > sacred-objects , Jay Munshi <jaymunshi@> > wrote: > > > > Sir, > > > > FYKI Snake Charming is banned in India. > > > > http://www.wildlifesos.org/rprotect/snake_charm.htm > > > > As for keeping exotic animals as pets. For snakes you need a > permit from the Wildlife Governing agency. I have had a very dear > friend who now joined the Army but back in college was an active > conservationist at one time had many snakes which he had rescued and > which he would later release into wild. > > > > I am quite surprised to see how there is a lack of empathy for > speechless animals. By far the most vicious animal on this planet is > the Home Sapien > > > > > > So is making monkeys and bears dance around. > > > > Best, > > > > Jay > > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@> wrote: > > dear friends > > > > some mischief mongers and jealous amateurs try to plant myths to > > scare the genuine customers from buying sacred objects from > > trustworthy people like us. > > > > for example when i posted the photo of a genuine siyar singhi last > > year, few people shouted selling banned animals product after which > i > > produced the relevent portions from the indian wildlife act > excepting > > vermin wherein this finds mention. similarly peacock feathers can > > also be traded freely as they are not banned. > > > > there is no ban on killing or trading a snake or snake product. > > snakecharming is a profession which is not banned. some snakes like > > python are now reared as pets by some elite people. poison > extracted > > from snakes is purchased and used by various pharmaceutical > > companies. in some northeastern states, snakes are displayed in > > their restaurants where they are cooked and served. so selling a > > snake or a part of a snake is not banned in india. > > > > with best wishes and blessings > > pandit arjun > > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > > > sacred-objects , Kochu Menon <kochu1@> wrote: > > > > > > another bunkum. There is no such ban. This is another myth > > perpetrated by the fraudster to keep the gullible buyer from > talking > > about it till after he realises he was defrauded. Can anyone show > the > > notification? and pray, under what law is it banned?Menon > > > > > > > > > sacred-objects@: rsbj66@: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:21:35 > > +0000 Re: is this Real Naga Mani? photo > > included > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow! Does the Govt of India recognize the existance of " Naga > mani " ? > > Is Nagamani mentioned in Indian law? Wow!!!sacred- > > objects , Ranganath P <askranga@> wrote:>> Hello> > > > Original Naga Mani cant to Sold in Public, > Since it has been > banned > > by Govt. Of India.> > That means its clear that the items which are > > Sale May not be Geniune or Original> > Regards> Ranganath> > > International Business Partner> Bangalore> > Richard Shaw-Brown > > <rsbj66@> wrote:> These are glass. Why not get the seller to > provide > > a gem certificate ruling out glass, known stones, or any other ID? > > You cannot buy without guarantee and certificate. This is true even > > with normal stones, what to speak of " naga mani. " If they can't > PROVE > > it then they cannot sell it (except to an idiot). Y/s, Richard> > -- > - > > In sacred-objects , " Raj " <raj_maiil@> wrote:> >> > > > thanks for replying sir.i found it for sale.they claim to have > > > > nagamanis of different types for example these are not transparent > > > > > so are they fake too?http://i19.tinypic.com/85nyz4n.jpg > > > > http://i2.tinypic.com/6tfnvib.jpg http://i7.tinypic.com/71d09p1.jpg > > > > > they say its polished nagamani from cobra but cant believe them > at > > > > all as there are lots of fakes and nagamani is very difficult > to > > find> > sacred-objects , " Richard Shaw- Brown " > > > > > <rsbj66@> wrote:> > >> > > Sir, real Nagamani is not transparent. > I > > have tested this type. It > > is artificial glass. Y/s, Richard> > > > > > > > > sacred-objects , " Raj " <raj_maiil@> > > wrote:> > > >> > > > Richard sir,> > > > can u please tell me > whether > > this is a real nagamani-> > > > http://i10.tinypic.com/85vxpbb.jpg> > > > > > > there are lots of fake nagamanis around...but,someone told me > > > > > that> > > > this is a real nagamani please confirm sir.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > Do > > You ?> Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > protection > > around > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________ > > > Check out some new online services at Windows Live Ideas—so new > > they haven't even been officially released yet. > > > http://www.msnspecials.in/windowslive/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Mail. > See how. > > > Never miss a thing. Make your homepage. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2007 Report Share Posted November 14, 2007 Dear Jay, I read your mail with some amusement. There are two aspects to human life, morality and legality. Human beings are prone to preach both and practice neither. I believe you are a rare exception to this rule and I congratulate you on that account. I should however mention that the criteria to earn respect and the criteria to integrity is neither morality nor legality. Every rational discussion should have a purpose. I presume your purpose is to save wildlife, my understanding of the thread is that the purpose of the thread is to understand the existance and effects of a mystical object with scriptural reference. A honest realignment might not be out of place for you to consider. More so in consideration that its not the morality of this group that is suspect as much as your need and affiliation to legality. In the event that I actually find a Nagamani, I will surely let you know without the worry of a legal problem. Because, for law to be enforced in my humble understanding either a precedent or a proof is required. Considering the legal devices might not have a precedent acquiring a proof will mean incriminating itself in the same mess that it would try to incriminate me. Hence rest assured you will know about it. As a tail piece, to rephrase your logic, you were drunk. Did you know that drunken driving and slander is illegal? Next time you drink and drive let me know and I will let the authorities know of the same. Surya. panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004sacred-objects Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:09:08 AM Re: is this Real Naga Mani? photo included dear friendthe mails written by me were highlighting how the indian government itself is hiring snakecharmers and using snakecharmers in their tourism ministry organised cultural fairs, especially in rajasthan. the government will not do so if the laws you are understanding are against it.however, your language is not good as you are remarking "next time you kill a snake" which is a way too personal.please desist from making personal remarks in an offensive posture.with best wishes and blessingspandit arjunwww.rudraksharemedy .comsacred-objects, Jay Munshi <jaymunshi@. ..> wrote:>> Hello Panditji,> > Laws are not necessarily inclusive but if you consider Snakes to be wild animals the entire interpretation will be very clear. A very good reason why the lawyer makes good money > > Well I am not that well versed with laws and definately dropped out of ICWAI but I did clear my Corporate Laws Paper. Hope you find the below extract interesting and I do welcome your comments on the same.> > Chapter I> > *****> (5) "captive animal" means any animal, specified in Schedule I, Schedule II, Schedule II or Schedule IV, which is captured or kept or bred in captivity;> *****> > Chapter III Section twelve. > **********> 12. Grant of permit for special purposes. - Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this Act, it shall be lawful for the Chief Wild Life Warden, to grant (23)[***] a permit, by an order in writing stating the reasons therefor, to any person, on payment of such fee as may be prescribed, which shall entitle the holder of such permit to hunt subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, any wild animal specified in such permit, for the purpose of,_> (a) education;(24) [(b) scientific research;> (bb) scientific Management.> Explanation - For the purposes of clause (bb), the expression, "Scientific Management" means - > > translocation of any wild animal to an alternative suitable habitat; or > population management of wildlife without killing or poisoning or destroying any wild animals; > ***********> > Regarding protected species Schedule II part II> > ***********> 11. Indian cobras (all sub-species belonging to genus Naja)> ***********> > > I dont know if you have google but I do assure you that the Indian Air Conditioned Elite do know how to use it very well and do understand Legal Language very well.> > For Your Kind Perusal Please Use The Below Link> http://envfor. nic.in/legis/ wildlife/ wildlife1. html> > And please do send me some proof of killing and possessing of animal part and I assure you the gentleman will be visited by required officer. Mind you the Airconditioned Indian Elite will not be using influence but a very simple police complaint.> > Killing of any wild animal is prohibited. If killed for self defence which is lawfull the remains of the animal belong to the Govt.> > Chapter III Section 12> > **********> 11. Hunting of Wild animals to be permitted in certain cases.– (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force and subject to the provisions of Chapter IV –> (a) the Chief Wildlife Warden may, if he is satisfied that any wild animal specified in Sch. 1 has become dangerous to human life or is so disabled or diseased as to be beyond recovery, by order in writing and stating the reasons therefor, permit any person to hunt such animal or cause animal to be hunted;> (b) the Chief Wildlife Warden or the authorised officer may, if he is satisfied that any wild animal specified in Sch. II Sch, III or Sch. IV has become dangerous to human life or to property (including standing crops on any land) or is so disabled or diseased as to be beyond recovery, by order in writing and stating the reasons therefor, permit any person to hunt such animal or cause such animal to be hunted.> (2) The killing or wounding in good faith of any wild animal in defence of oneself or of any other person shall not be an offence;> Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall exonerate any person who, when such defence becomes necessary, was committing any act in contravention of any provision of this Act or any rule or order made thereunder.> (3) Any wild animal killed or wounded in defence of any person shall be Government property.> **********> > If the above is not very clear please let me know the next time you kill a wild animal for anything but self defence and we will let a court decide who is right. > > The Indian Airconditioned Psuedo Elite FYKI claims what they know.> > And by the way that Sharukh Khan adds example was way too lame He smokes in movies so do you encourage your children to smoke?> > Please do forgive my tone for I might have been a bit impolite disregarding your age and wisdom and I am way too drunk tonight.> > best regards,> > Jay> > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ ...> wrote:> dear friend> > instead of referring the articles of third parties, i studied the > indian wildlife protection act 1972 along with its amendments and > nowhere i find snakecharming banned in india. if you give me the > relvent chapters or schedules of this act where it mentions > snakecharming banned in india, i would be grateful to you.> > snakecharmers have been hired by the government and were sent at > government cost to various international cultural fairs abroad > organised by the indian tourism ministry. even today several > government tourism offices hire snakecharmers at their camps. all > these are done officially.> > cobra is the snake which we are discussing in this thread. cobra is > a normal snake according to indian wildlife act and its killing for > self defence is not banned. trading the skin of only some rare > snakes which are extinct or rarest in nature is banned but that does > not apply surely to cobra which we are discussing.> > snakecharmers were unnecessarily branded bad by the elite > airconditioned lifestyle animal lovers. last year hundreds of > snakecharmers seized the assembly of orissa and left hundreds of > snakes inside the assembly to highlight the harrassment meted out to > them after which the government pronounced clearly that snakecharmers > belong to an old traditional profession which will not be harrassed > by the governemnt.> > if you still believe that snakecharming is banned, please mention the > relevent clauses from the act and also mention why govenment is > promoting snakecharming in its own fairs even today. if > snakecharming is really banned in india, as you are claiming, crores > of worth advertisement by pepsi with sharukh khan playing as a > snakecharmer would have been banned.> > with best wishes and blessings> pandit arjun> www.rudraksharemedy .com> > sacred-objects, Jay Munshi <jaymunshi@> > wrote:> >> > Sir,> > > > FYKI Snake Charming is banned in India.> > > > http://www.wildlife sos.org/rprotect /snake_charm. htm> > > > As for keeping exotic animals as pets. For snakes you need a > permit from the Wildlife Governing agency. I have had a very dear > friend who now joined the Army but back in college was an active > conservationist at one time had many snakes which he had rescued and > which he would later release into wild.> > > > I am quite surprised to see how there is a lack of empathy for > speechless animals. By far the most vicious animal on this planet is > the Home Sapien > > > > > > So is making monkeys and bears dance around.> > > > Best,> > > > Jay> > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ > wrote:> > dear friends> > > > some mischief mongers and jealous amateurs try to plant myths to > > scare the genuine customers from buying sacred objects from > > trustworthy people like us.> > > > for example when i posted the photo of a genuine siyar singhi last > > year, few people shouted selling banned animals product after which > i > > produced the relevent portions from the indian wildlife act > excepting > > vermin wherein this finds mention. similarly peacock feathers can > > also be traded freely as they are not banned.> > > > there is no ban on killing or trading a snake or snake product. > > snakecharming is a profession which is not banned. some snakes like > > python are now reared as pets by some elite people. poison > extracted > > from snakes is purchased and used by various pharmaceutical > > companies. in some northeastern states, snakes are displayed in > > their restaurants where they are cooked and served. so selling a > > snake or a part of a snake is not banned in india.> > > > with best wishes and blessings> > pandit arjun> > www.rudraksharemedy .com> > > > sacred-objects, Kochu Menon <kochu1@> wrote:> > >> > > another bunkum. There is no such ban. This is another myth > > perpetrated by the fraudster to keep the gullible buyer from > talking > > about it till after he realises he was defrauded. Can anyone show > the > > notification? and pray, under what law is it banned?Menon> > > > > > > > > sacred-objects@ : rsbj66@: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:21:35 > > +0000 Re: is this Real Naga Mani? photo > > included> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wow! Does the Govt of India recognize the existance of "Naga > mani"? > > Is Nagamani mentioned in Indian law? Wow!!!sacred-> > objects@ .com, Ranganath P <askranga@> wrote:>> Hello> > > > Original Naga Mani cant to Sold in Public, > Since it has been > banned > > by Govt. Of India.> > That means its clear that the items which are > > Sale May not be Geniune or Original> > Regards> Ranganath> > > International Business Partner> Bangalore> > Richard Shaw-Brown > > <rsbj66@> wrote:> These are glass. Why not get the seller to > provide > > a gem certificate ruling out glass, known stones, or any other ID? > > You cannot buy without guarantee and certificate. This is true even > > with normal stones, what to speak of "naga mani." If they can't > PROVE > > it then they cannot sell it (except to an idiot). Y/s, Richard> > --> - > > In sacred-objects, "Raj" <raj_maiil@> wrote:> >> > > > thanks for replying sir.i found it for sale.they claim to have > > > > nagamanis of different types for example these are not transparent > > > > > so are they fake too?http://i19.tinypic. com/85nyz4n. jpg > > > > http://i2.tinypic. com/6tfnvib. jpg http://i7.tinypic. com/71d09p1. jpg > > > > > they say its polished nagamani from cobra but cant believe them > at > > > > all as there are lots of fakes and nagamani is very difficult > to > > find> > sacred-objects, "Richard Shaw-Brown" > > > > > <rsbj66@> wrote:> > >> > > Sir, real Nagamani is not transparent. > I > > have tested this type. It > > is artificial glass. Y/s, Richard> > > > > > > > > sacred-objects, "Raj" <raj_maiil@> > > wrote:> > > >> > > > Richard sir,> > > > can u please tell me > whether > > this is a real nagamani-> > > > http://i10.tinypic. com/85vxpbb. jpg> > > > > > > there are lots of fake nagamanis around...but, someone told me > > > > > that> > > > this is a real nagamani please confirm sir.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __> Do > > You ?> Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam > protection > > around > http://mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _> > > Check out some new online services at Windows Live Ideas—so new > > they haven't even been officially released yet.> > > http://www.msnspeci als.in/windowsli ve/> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---> > Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Mail. > See how.> >> > > > > > > ------------ --------- --------- ---> Never miss a thing. Make your homepage.> Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make your homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2007 Report Share Posted November 14, 2007 Dear Panditji, I did not mean personal offence while i can only thank you for titling a certain category of people as elite air conditioned animal lovers. you claimed that you were well versed with the indian wild life act 1972 and hence I posted the details supporting my argument. 'when you kill' was used as figuratively as 'elite air conditioned animal lover' and if no offence was meant from your side no offence was meant from my side. anyway i did make my point clear with supporting reference. best, Jay --- panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote: > dear friend > > the mails written by me were highlighting how the > indian government > itself is hiring snakecharmers and using > snakecharmers in their > tourism ministry organised cultural fairs, > especially in rajasthan. > the government will not do so if the laws you are > understanding are > against it. > > however, your language is not good as you are > remarking " next time > you kill a snake " which is a way too personal. > > please desist from making personal remarks in an > offensive posture. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy.com > > sacred-objects , Jay Munshi > <jaymunshi > wrote: > > > > Hello Panditji, > > > > Laws are not necessarily inclusive but if you > consider Snakes to > be wild animals the entire interpretation will be > very clear. A very > good reason why the lawyer makes good money > > > > Well I am not that well versed with laws and > definately dropped > out of ICWAI but I did clear my Corporate Laws > Paper. Hope you find > the below extract interesting and I do welcome your > comments on the > same. > > > > Chapter I > > > > ***** > > (5) " captive animal " means any animal, specified > in Schedule I, > Schedule II, Schedule II or Schedule IV, which is > captured or kept or > bred in captivity; > > ***** > > > > Chapter III Section twelve. > > ********** > > 12. Grant of permit for special purposes. - > Notwithstanding > anything contained elsewhere in this Act, it shall > be lawful for the > Chief Wild Life Warden, to grant (23)[***] a permit, > by an order in > writing stating the reasons therefor, to any person, > on payment of > such fee as may be prescribed, which shall entitle > the holder of such > permit to hunt subject to such conditions as may be > specified > therein, any wild animal specified in such permit, > for the purpose > of,_ > > (a) education;(24)[(b) scientific research; > > (bb) scientific Management. > > Explanation - For the purposes of clause (bb), > the > expression, " Scientific Management " means - > > > > translocation of any wild animal to an > alternative suitable > habitat; or > > population management of wildlife without > killing or poisoning > or destroying any wild animals; > > *********** > > > > Regarding protected species Schedule II part II > > > > *********** > > 11. Indian cobras (all sub-species belonging > to genus Naja) > > *********** > > > > > > I dont know if you have google but I do assure > you that the > Indian Air Conditioned Elite do know how to use it > very well and do > understand Legal Language very well. > > > > For Your Kind Perusal Please Use The Below Link > > > http://envfor.nic.in/legis/wildlife/wildlife1.html > > > > And please do send me some proof of killing and > possessing of > animal part and I assure you the gentleman will be > visited by > required officer. Mind you the Airconditioned Indian > Elite will not > be using influence but a very simple police > complaint. > > > > Killing of any wild animal is prohibited. If > killed for self > defence which is lawfull the remains of the animal > belong to the Govt. > > > > Chapter III Section 12 > > > > ********** > > 11. Hunting of Wild animals to be permitted in > certain cases. > (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other > law for the time > being in force and subject to the provisions of > Chapter IV > > (a) the Chief Wildlife Warden may, if he > is satisfied that > any wild animal specified in Sch. 1 has become > dangerous to human > life or is so disabled or diseased as to be beyond > recovery, by order > in writing and stating the reasons therefor, permit > any person to > hunt such animal or cause animal to be hunted; > > (b) the Chief Wildlife Warden or the authorised > officer may, if > he is satisfied that any wild animal specified in > Sch. II Sch, III or > Sch. IV has become dangerous to human life or to > property (including > standing crops on any land) or is so disabled or > diseased as to be > beyond recovery, by order in writing and stating the > reasons > therefor, permit any person to hunt such animal or > cause such animal > to be hunted. > > (2) The killing or wounding in good faith of any > wild animal in > defence of oneself or of any other person shall not > be an offence; > > Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall > exonerate any > person who, when such defence becomes necessary, was > committing any > act in contravention of any provision of this Act or > any rule or > order made thereunder. > > (3) Any wild animal killed or wounded in defence > of any person > shall be Government property. > > ********** > > > > If the above is not very clear please let me > know the next time > you kill a wild animal for anything but self defence > and we will let > a court decide who is right. > > > > The Indian Airconditioned Psuedo Elite FYKI > claims what they know. > > > > And by the way that Sharukh Khan adds example > was way too lame > He smokes in movies so do you encourage your > children to smoke? > > > > Please do forgive my tone for I might have been > a bit impolite > disregarding your age and wisdom and I am way too > drunk tonight. > > > > best regards, > > > > Jay > > > > > > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote: > > dear friend > > > > instead of referring the articles of third > parties, i studied the > > indian wildlife protection act 1972 along with its > amendments and > > nowhere i find snakecharming banned in india. if > you give me the > > relvent chapters or schedules of this act where it > mentions > > snakecharming banned in india, i would be grateful > to you. > === message truncated === ______________________________\ ____ Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Mail. See how. http://overview.mail./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2007 Report Share Posted November 14, 2007 Dear Surya, I so far have been a responsible citizen and assure you that I do not drink and drive. Drunk slander I am not sure if is illegal but as far as my posting goes I have not used unparliamentary language. As far as i know drunk between the keyboard and the computer is yet to be fined. My mail was not to seek respect or glory and perhaps am as vain as any other human in pursuit of a moral life but I do make an honest attempt so as to not cause inconvinience to fellowmen. Thanks for your support to conservation of wildlife. best regards, Jay --- surya vishnubhotla <surya_prakashv wrote: > Dear Jay, > I read your mail with some amusement. There are two > aspects to human life, morality and legality. Human > beings are prone to preach both and practice > neither. I believe you are a rare exception to this > rule and I congratulate you on that account. I > should however mention that the criteria to earn > respect and the criteria to integrity is neither > morality nor legality. > > Every rational discussion should have a purpose. I > presume your purpose is to save wildlife, my > understanding of the thread is that the purpose of > the thread is to understand the existance and > effects of a mystical object with scriptural > reference. A honest realignment might not be out of > place for you to consider. More so in consideration > that its not the morality of this group that is > suspect as much as your need and affiliation to > legality. > > In the event that I actually find a Nagamani, I will > surely let you know without the worry of a legal > problem. Because, for law to be enforced in my > humble understanding either a precedent or a proof > is required. Considering the legal devices might not > have a precedent acquiring a proof will mean > incriminating itself in the same mess that it would > try to incriminate me. Hence rest assured you will > know about it. > > As a tail piece, to rephrase your logic, you were > drunk. Did you know that drunken driving and slander > is illegal? Next time you drink and drive let me > know and I will let the authorities know of the > same. > > Surya. > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 > sacred-objects > Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:09:08 AM > Re: is this Real Naga > Mani? photo included > > dear friend > > the mails written by me were highlighting how the > indian government > itself is hiring snakecharmers and using > snakecharmers in their > tourism ministry organised cultural fairs, > especially in rajasthan. > the government will not do so if the laws you are > understanding are > against it. > > however, your language is not good as you are > remarking " next time > you kill a snake " which is a way too personal. > > please desist from making personal remarks in an > offensive posture. > > with best wishes and blessings > pandit arjun > www.rudraksharemedy .com > > sacred-objects, Jay Munshi > <jaymunshi@. ..> > wrote: > > > > Hello Panditji, > > > > Laws are not necessarily inclusive but if you > consider Snakes to > be wild animals the entire interpretation will be > very clear. A very > good reason why the lawyer makes good money > > > > Well I am not that well versed with laws and > definately dropped > out of ICWAI but I did clear my Corporate Laws > Paper. Hope you find > the below extract interesting and I do welcome your > comments on the > same. > > > > Chapter I > > > > ***** > > (5) " captive animal " means any animal, specified > in Schedule I, > Schedule II, Schedule II or Schedule IV, which is > captured or kept or > bred in captivity; > > ***** > > > > Chapter III Section twelve. > > ********** > > 12. Grant of permit for special purposes. - > Notwithstanding > anything contained elsewhere in this Act, it shall > be lawful for the > Chief Wild Life Warden, to grant (23)[***] a permit, > by an order in > writing stating the reasons therefor, to any person, > on payment of > such fee as may be prescribed, which shall entitle > the holder of such > permit to hunt subject to such conditions as may be > specified > therein, any wild animal specified in such permit, > for the purpose > of,_ > > (a) education;(24) [(b) scientific research; > > (bb) scientific Management. > > Explanation - For the purposes of clause (bb), the > > expression, " Scientific Management " means - > > > > translocation of any wild animal to an alternative > suitable > habitat; or > > population management of wildlife without killing > or poisoning > or destroying any wild animals; > > *********** > > > > Regarding protected species Schedule II part II > > > > *********** > > 11. Indian cobras (all sub-species belonging to > genus Naja) > > *********** > > > > > > I dont know if you have google but I do assure you > that the > Indian Air Conditioned Elite do know how to use it > very well and do > understand Legal Language very well. > > > > For Your Kind Perusal Please Use The Below Link > > http://envfor. nic.in/legis/ wildlife/ wildlife1. > html > > > > And please do send me some proof of killing and > possessing of > animal part and I assure you the gentleman will be > visited by > required officer. Mind you the Airconditioned Indian > Elite will not > be using influence but a very simple police > complaint. > > > > Killing of any wild animal is prohibited. If > killed for self > defence which is lawfull the remains of the animal > belong to the Govt. > > > > Chapter III Section 12 > > > > ********** > > 11. Hunting of Wild animals to be permitted in > certain cases. > (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other > law for the time > being in force and subject to the provisions of > Chapter IV > > (a) the Chief Wildlife Warden may, if he is > satisfied that > any wild animal specified in Sch. 1 has become > dangerous to human > life or is so disabled or diseased as to be beyond > recovery, by order > in writing and stating the reasons therefor, permit > any person to > hunt such animal or cause animal to be hunted; > > (b) the Chief Wildlife Warden or the authorised > officer may, if > he is satisfied that any wild animal specified in > Sch. II Sch, III or > Sch. IV has become dangerous to human life or to > property (including > standing crops on any land) or is so disabled or > diseased as to be > beyond recovery, by order in writing and stating the > reasons > therefor, permit any person to hunt such animal or > cause such animal > to be hunted. > > (2) The killing or wounding in good faith of any > wild animal in > defence of oneself or of any other person shall not > be an offence; > > Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall > exonerate any > person who, when such defence becomes necessary, was > committing any > === message truncated === ______________________________\ ____ Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Mail. See how. http://overview.mail./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2007 Report Share Posted November 14, 2007 You humble me. But I hope you do see the real issues I hide behind my sarcasm. apologies for any offence! Surya. Jay Munshi <jaymunshisacred-objects Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:46:15 PMRe: Re: is this Real Naga Mani? photo included Dear Surya,I so far have been a responsible citizen and assureyou that I do not drink and drive. Drunk slander I amnot sure if is illegal but as far as my posting goes Ihave not used unparliamentary language. As far as iknow drunk between the keyboard and the computer isyet to be fined.My mail was not to seek respect or glory and perhapsam as vain as any other human in pursuit of a morallife but I do make an honest attempt so as to notcause inconvinience to fellowmen.Thanks for your support to conservation of wildlife.best regards, Jay --- surya vishnubhotla <surya_prakashv@ >wrote:> Dear Jay,> I read your mail with some amusement. There are two> aspects to human life, morality and legality. Human> beings are prone to preach both and practice> neither. I believe you are a rare exception to this> rule and I congratulate you on that account. I> should however mention that the criteria to earn> respect and the criteria to integrity is neither> morality nor legality.> > Every rational discussion should have a purpose. I> presume your purpose is to save wildlife, my> understanding of the thread is that the purpose of> the thread is to understand the existance and> effects of a mystical object with scriptural> reference. A honest realignment might not be out of> place for you to consider. More so in consideration> that its not the morality of this group that is> suspect as much as your need and affiliation to> legality.> > In the event that I actually find a Nagamani, I will> surely let you know without the worry of a legal> problem. Because, for law to be enforced in my> humble understanding either a precedent or a proof> is required. Considering the legal devices might not> have a precedent acquiring a proof will mean> incriminating itself in the same mess that it would> try to incriminate me. Hence rest assured you will> know about it.> > As a tail piece, to rephrase your logic, you were> drunk. Did you know that drunken driving and slander> is illegal? Next time you drink and drive let me> know and I will let the authorities know of the> same.> > Surya.> > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ >> sacred-objects> Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:09:08 AM> Re: is this Real Naga> Mani? photo included> > dear friend> > the mails written by me were highlighting how the> indian government > itself is hiring snakecharmers and using> snakecharmers in their > tourism ministry organised cultural fairs,> especially in rajasthan. > the government will not do so if the laws you are> understanding are > against it.> > however, your language is not good as you are> remarking "next time > you kill a snake" which is a way too personal.> > please desist from making personal remarks in an> offensive posture.> > with best wishes and blessings> pandit arjun> www.rudraksharemedy ..com> > sacred-objects, Jay Munshi> <jaymunshi@. ..> > wrote:> >> > Hello Panditji,> > > > Laws are not necessarily inclusive but if you> consider Snakes to > be wild animals the entire interpretation will be> very clear. A very > good reason why the lawyer makes good money > > > > Well I am not that well versed with laws and> definately dropped > out of ICWAI but I did clear my Corporate Laws> Paper. Hope you find > the below extract interesting and I do welcome your> comments on the > same.> > > > Chapter I> > > > *****> > (5) "captive animal" means any animal, specified> in Schedule I, > Schedule II, Schedule II or Schedule IV, which is> captured or kept or > bred in captivity;> > *****> > > > Chapter III Section twelve. > > **********> > 12. Grant of permit for special purposes. -> Notwithstanding > anything contained elsewhere in this Act, it shall> be lawful for the > Chief Wild Life Warden, to grant (23)[***] a permit,> by an order in > writing stating the reasons therefor, to any person,> on payment of > such fee as may be prescribed, which shall entitle> the holder of such > permit to hunt subject to such conditions as may be> specified > therein, any wild animal specified in such permit,> for the purpose > of,_> > (a) education;(24) [(b) scientific research;> > (bb) scientific Management.> > Explanation - For the purposes of clause (bb), the> > expression, "Scientific Management" means - > > > > translocation of any wild animal to an alternative> suitable > habitat; or > > population management of wildlife without killing> or poisoning > or destroying any wild animals; > > ***********> > > > Regarding protected species Schedule II part II> > > > ***********> > 11. Indian cobras (all sub-species belonging to> genus Naja)> > ***********> > > > > > I dont know if you have google but I do assure you> that the > Indian Air Conditioned Elite do know how to use it> very well and do > understand Legal Language very well.> > > > For Your Kind Perusal Please Use The Below Link> > http://envfor. nic.in/legis/ wildlife/ wildlife1.> html> > > > And please do send me some proof of killing and> possessing of > animal part and I assure you the gentleman will be> visited by > required officer. Mind you the Airconditioned Indian> Elite will not > be using influence but a very simple police> complaint.> > > > Killing of any wild animal is prohibited. If> killed for self > defence which is lawfull the remains of the animal> belong to the Govt.> > > > Chapter III Section 12> > > > **********> > 11. Hunting of Wild animals to be permitted in> certain cases. > (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other> law for the time > being in force and subject to the provisions of> Chapter IV > > (a) the Chief Wildlife Warden may, if he is> satisfied that > any wild animal specified in Sch. 1 has become> dangerous to human > life or is so disabled or diseased as to be beyond> recovery, by order > in writing and stating the reasons therefor, permit> any person to > hunt such animal or cause animal to be hunted;> > (b) the Chief Wildlife Warden or the authorised> officer may, if > he is satisfied that any wild animal specified in> Sch. II Sch, III or > Sch. IV has become dangerous to human life or to> property (including > standing crops on any land) or is so disabled or> diseased as to be > beyond recovery, by order in writing and stating the> reasons > therefor, permit any person to hunt such animal or> cause such animal > to be hunted.> > (2) The killing or wounding in good faith of any> wild animal in > defence of oneself or of any other person shall not> be an offence;> > Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall> exonerate any > person who, when such defence becomes necessary, was> committing any > === message truncated ===____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _________ _Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Mail. See how. http://overview. mail.. com/ Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make your homepage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 15, 2007 Report Share Posted November 15, 2007 Ha ha ha....yes i do ignore your sarcasm. I am a straight faced straight tongued chap and i take stand if i believe in something. best, Jay --- surya vishnubhotla <surya_prakashv wrote: > You humble me. But I hope you do see the real issues > I hide behind my sarcasm. apologies for any > offence! > Surya. > > > > Jay Munshi <jaymunshi > sacred-objects > Wednesday, November 14, 2007 1:46:15 PM > Re: Re: is this Real Naga > Mani? photo included > > Dear Surya, > I so far have been a responsible citizen and assure > you that I do not drink and drive. Drunk slander I > am > not sure if is illegal but as far as my posting goes > I > have not used unparliamentary language. As far as i > know drunk between the keyboard and the computer is > yet to be fined. > > My mail was not to seek respect or glory and perhaps > am as vain as any other human in pursuit of a moral > life but I do make an honest attempt so as to not > cause inconvinience to fellowmen. > > Thanks for your support to conservation of wildlife. > best regards, > Jay > > --- surya vishnubhotla <surya_prakashv@ > > wrote: > > > Dear Jay, > > I read your mail with some amusement. There are > two > > aspects to human life, morality and legality. > Human > > beings are prone to preach both and practice > > neither. I believe you are a rare exception to > this > > rule and I congratulate you on that account. I > > should however mention that the criteria to earn > > respect and the criteria to integrity is neither > > morality nor legality. > > > > Every rational discussion should have a purpose. I > > presume your purpose is to save wildlife, my > > understanding of the thread is that the purpose of > > the thread is to understand the existance and > > effects of a mystical object with scriptural > > reference. A honest realignment might not be out > of > > place for you to consider. More so in > consideration > > that its not the morality of this group that is > > suspect as much as your need and affiliation to > > legality. > > > > In the event that I actually find a Nagamani, I > will > > surely let you know without the worry of a legal > > problem. Because, for law to be enforced in my > > humble understanding either a precedent or a proof > > is required. Considering the legal devices might > not > > have a precedent acquiring a proof will mean > > incriminating itself in the same mess that it > would > > try to incriminate me. Hence rest assured you will > > know about it. > > > > As a tail piece, to rephrase your logic, you were > > drunk. Did you know that drunken driving and > slander > > is illegal? Next time you drink and drive let me > > know and I will let the authorities know of the > > same. > > > > Surya. > > > > > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@ > > > sacred-objects > > Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:09:08 AM > > Re: is this Real Naga > > Mani? photo included > > > > dear friend > > > > the mails written by me were highlighting how the > > indian government > > itself is hiring snakecharmers and using > > snakecharmers in their > > tourism ministry organised cultural fairs, > > especially in rajasthan. > > the government will not do so if the laws you are > > understanding are > > against it. > > > > however, your language is not good as you are > > remarking " next time > > you kill a snake " which is a way too personal. > > > > please desist from making personal remarks in an > > offensive posture. > > > > with best wishes and blessings > > pandit arjun > > www.rudraksharemedy .com > > > > sacred-objects, Jay > Munshi > > <jaymunshi@. ..> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hello Panditji, > > > > > > Laws are not necessarily inclusive but if you > > consider Snakes to > > be wild animals the entire interpretation will be > > very clear. A very > > good reason why the lawyer makes good money > > > > > > Well I am not that well versed with laws and > > definately dropped > > out of ICWAI but I did clear my Corporate Laws > > Paper. Hope you find > > the below extract interesting and I do welcome > your > > comments on the > > same. > > > > > > Chapter I > > > > > > ***** > > > (5) " captive animal " means any animal, specified > > in Schedule I, > > Schedule II, Schedule II or Schedule IV, which is > > captured or kept or > > bred in captivity; > > > ***** > > > > > > Chapter III Section twelve. > > > ********** > > > 12. Grant of permit for special purposes. - > > Notwithstanding > > anything contained elsewhere in this Act, it shall > > be lawful for the > > Chief Wild Life Warden, to grant (23)[***] a > permit, > > by an order in > > writing stating the reasons therefor, to any > person, > > on payment of > > such fee as may be prescribed, which shall entitle > > the holder of such > > permit to hunt subject to such conditions as may > be > > specified > > therein, any wild animal specified in such permit, > > for the purpose > > of,_ > > > (a) education;(24) [(b) scientific research; > > > (bb) scientific Management. > > > Explanation - For the purposes of clause (bb), > the > > > > expression, " Scientific Management " means - > > > > > > translocation of any wild animal to an > alternative > > suitable > > habitat; or > > > population management of wildlife without > killing > > or poisoning > > or destroying any wild animals; > > > *********** > > > > > > Regarding protected species Schedule II part II > > > > > > *********** > > > 11. Indian cobras (all sub-species belonging to > > genus Naja) > > > *********** > > > > > > > > > I dont know if you have google but I do assure > you > > that the > > Indian Air Conditioned Elite do know how to use it > > very well and do > > understand Legal Language very well. > > > > > > For Your Kind Perusal Please Use The Below Link > > > http://envfor. nic.in/legis/ wildlife/ > wildlife1. > > html > === message truncated === ______________________________\ ____ Be a better pen pal. Text or chat with friends inside Mail. See how. http://overview.mail./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.