Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

DNA and Diwali

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Since you are on the topic of DNA, I thought you might enjoy reading some articles about DNA recovered from ancient mummies and other very old and odd sources.

http://www.isogg.org/ancientdna.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DNA_tested_mummies

I tried to absorb the very long file submitted for "free" about Aryan invasion theories...but it just goes to prove that trying to nail down Indian history is a brutal task full of alternative explanations. If among India historians themselves the truth remains illusive, then how can one expect a non-Indian historian to make any absolutely accurate conclusions? It's a lot to wade through and leaves one almost numb with theories and guesses and counter-theories.

I think that building up DNA profiles is absolutely essential to achieve any historical understanding.

By the way, it IS Diwali!

Happy Diwali to all .

(OK so I went off-topic just a little)

All the best,

Sue

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, " mkelkar2003 "

<mayureshkelkar wrote:

>

> , " Suzanne Olsson "

> <suzanne_olsson@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Since you are on the topic of DNA, I thought you might enjoy

reading

> > some articles about DNA recovered from ancient mummies and other

> very

> > old and odd sources.

> >

> > http://www.isogg.org/ancientdna.htm

> > <http://www.isogg.org/ancientdna.htm>

> >

> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DNA_tested_mummies

> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DNA_tested_mummies>

> >

> > I tried to absorb the very long file submitted for " free " about

> Aryan

> > invasion theories...but it just goes to prove that trying to nail

> down

> > Indian history is a brutal task full of alternative explanations.

If

> > among India historians themselves the truth remains illusive,

then

> how

> > can one expect a non-Indian historian to make any absolutely

> accurate

> > conclusions?

>

> Hi Sue:

>

> Happy Diwali to you! Actually Indian history is not that

complicated.

> The Puranas are extremly accurate. One just has to be weary of the

> Western attempts to box it into the Biblical view that the world

was

> created about 6000 years ago. That IS the source of the problem.

> Please see the link below:

>

> http://in.geocities.com/nvasrikanth/Royal_Chron.htm

>

> M. Kelkar

>

>

>

> It's a lot to wade through and leaves one almost numb with

> > theories and guesses and counter-theories.

> >

> > I think that building up DNA profiles is absolutely essential to

> achieve

> > any historical understanding.

> >

> > By the way, it IS Diwali!

> >

> > Happy Diwali to all .

> >

> > (OK so I went off-topic just a little)

> >

> > All the best,

> >

> > Sue

> >

>

 

Please see Lincoln on Newton and Jones 2002.pdf in the files section

of this group. The Biblical account of creation was used to fix the

breakup of the hypothetically reconstructed " Proto Indo European "

language. The Rig Veda was dated at 1500 BCE as a consequence. Next

the late, vague and sparse Greek accounts of " India " were used to

date important figures like Panini and Chandragupta Maurya.

 

M. Kelkar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...