Gem stones compared to rudrakshas

[Guest guest]

Dear Rahul,

Rudrakshas do not have negative qualities whatsoever in comparison to the intricasies of carefully selected gemstones that only highly competent and expertly skilled Jyotishis would recommend.

In fact, rudrakshas should be rightly classified as "Mani". (An article in Rudra Centre's archives will explain this rather nicely by Shri Shri K. S. Venkataraman in this forum long ago in answer to someone's question.)

Yes all types of rudrakshas can be worn without malevolent effects.

Gemstones should only be worn after consultation with an expert Jyotishi.

With rudraksha, one can either select their own mala combinations according to instinct (Upaguru's guidance) or seek recommendation from learned and experienced people such as from Rudra Centre's Team or Ms Neeta Ji who is one of the world's best rudraksha experts.

Regarding your example of 7 mukhi:

It does not strengthen a malefic position in the horoscope but will assist in balancing it in the degrees required.

 

Om Bholenath

 

, Rahul Ratan <rahulratan wrote:>> > Namaste Narasimhaye,> > How does the effect of gem stones differ from rudrakshas? Myunderstanding is that all rudrakshas can be worn and there are no negativeeffects. However, all gem stones cannot be worn as there will be negativeeffects from the ones that do not suit a person.> > As an example, if a planet is well situated but weak in a horoscope, wewill wear a gem to strengthen it. If it is a benefic but badly situated (i.e., beneficplanet like Jupiter situated in the house of death etc), we may not strengthenbut will try to pacify it. > > So, does wearing rudrakshas strengthen the planets that are associatedwith the rudraksha? As an example, does wearing 7 mukhi strengthen Saturn? > > Thanks> > Rahul>