Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Digest Number 107

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

In a previous posting...

>

>Tim Gerchmez:

>

> I'm also too old to ever get started in a

>> formal monastic program (I'll be 35 in August)

>

>

>Tom:

>

>That is strange that you should feel that way, Tim.

 

*******

 

I have in the past contacted a couple of hindu and buddhist monasteries and they

were very reluctant to take on anyone over 35 for monastic vows...It seems that

most of their monks are older, and they would like some " young blood " . I was

informed that one can live a spiritual life as a householder, to which I could

only reply " DUH! " . One would think that an older person (I myself am 40) who has

seen enough of the world to know what he wants would be a suitable candidate for

such an endeavor, but apparently not in America. Yet Life puts us where it wants

us, and for that we must ultimately be grateful.

 

Namaste,

Thomas

 

 

Angelfire for your free web-based e-mail. http://www.angelfire.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In a message dated 6/20/99 8:23:49 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

arcanta writes:

 

<< but apparently not in America. >>

 

I don't think this is only true in America. The rules for the Ramakrishna

Order are that one cannot be older than 30 to become a Monk of the Order,

which is unfortunate.

 

I do believe that one of the primary reasons for this rule is the physical

health and vigour of youth is more desirable in most monastic orders. As a

person ages, so does his body, and consequently there is an assumption of a

declination in health.

 

It has always saddened me that the more spiritually and chronologically

mature a person is, the less likelihood of his being accepted into a formal

spiritual community. And yet it is taught that the last stage of life is

when one naturally renounces the world and seeks God.

 

I have never quite reconciled this all-pervading monastic rule since the urge

to procreate is so strong in youth. I have seen many who, while living in a

celibate community, struggle with the distraction their primal bodily urges

create since youth is a time when those urges are most powerful.

 

In the final stage of life, the imperious " urge to merge " cools down

considerably, as one naturally turns within. At this time one has

experienced the futility of being " of the world " , and at last experiences

true wealth which comes from within.

 

What has more value to those of us who seek guidance from a teacher? -

physical strength and stamina, or spiritual maturity and wisdom, which

include empathy and compassion for the struggles of living in THIS world that

living in a cave does not provide?

 

If a person has not lived in the world, he cannot empathize with the

struggles of family life, relationships, career and finances. What has such

a young monk to offer those of us who have immersed ourselves in worldly life

and come out the other side with a great deal of experience and wisdom? As

Swamiji said, experience is the ONLY TEACHER. All the scriputral studies in

the world cannot give a young person the wisdom that living in this world can

give.

 

So, with all due respect to the financial hardship that may be placed on a

spiritual order due to medical problems of older people, the whole idea of

placing our spiritual quest in the hands of young, inexperienced scholars

does not make sense to me. As these young monks age, only the struggles of

worldly life can give them the necessary tools to be of service to the rest

of us.

 

It is an axiom that if a person does not pursue spirituality before the age

of 30 there is no hope for transformation. This may or may not be true, but

for those of us who are well over thirty and continue to transform and grow

closer to the God of our understanding, it is a sad commentary that we are

locked out of the monastic lifestyle because we are too old. It leads one to

question the values of the powers that be.

 

It seems to me that rather than discriminating on the basis of age, decisions

about accepting an individual into monastic order would be made on a case by

case, individual, basis. This seems to be the more intelligent way to go.

 

Additionally, a person's emotional and mental stability come with age, and

the ability to commit to monastic life, is far greater. The ability to

commit to anything is greater with age.

 

Om Shanti!

 

Jody (Premadevi)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Thomas and Tim,

In defense of the monasteries: I have lived in many. I have seen men come

and go. The main problem is not the age per se, it is the degree to which

we have become " accustomed to our ways " by the age of 35 or so. Yes, there

must be some exceptions, but mostly I've seen that the requirements of a

highly structured lifestyle is pinching, demanding beyond the tolerance of

many persons, who are usually individualistic. After a time of attempting

to toe the line and adjust internally, most get turned off and go out,

sometimes with rancor. Suggest reading a book called I WAS A MONK, by John

Tettemer; I hope it's still available somewhere. The very fact that both of

you are in this " chat-room " indicates a degree on non-conformity, doesn't

it? I'm not being negative in that: non-conformity is fine in the right

places! Regards, Swami Yogeshananda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In a message dated 99-06-20 18:54:00 EDT, JodyHolly1 writes:

 

<<

It has always saddened me that the more spiritually and chronologically

mature a person is, the less likelihood of his being accepted into a formal

spiritual community. And yet it is taught that the last stage of life is

when one naturally renounces the world and seeks God.

>>

 

I just had to respond to this...for, it so echos my feelings as well. It is

sad that there are no spiritual communities that accept monastics at older

ages, men or women. I remember when I was in my very early 30's my desire

was tremendous to leave this world...still is, but I have better reconcilled

myself to the fact that there is just no place to go. I use to cry almost

every night thinking of having to return to the world the next day.

 

<<If a person has not lived in the world, he cannot empathize with the

struggles of family life, relationships, career and finances. What has such

a young monk to offer those of us who have immersed ourselves in worldly life

and come out the other side with a great deal of experience and wisdom? As

Swamiji said, experience is the ONLY TEACHER. All the scriputral studies in

the world cannot give a young person the wisdom that living in this world can

give.>>

 

Didn't Swamiji say once that the one bad thing about monastic life was that

it removed the spiritual souls from the community? I agree. And, I think

what you say is also true...only one who has been through the experience can

really empathize with another. I have been around quite a few monastics in

my life, listening, watching, observing....and I must say that for the most

part they ARE out of touch with the types of problems that those living in

the world contend with on a day to day basis. I remember being told once

that the monastics " keep the fire burning " ...to which I replied...what good

is the fire if no one can find it or see it because it is kept locked away

behind walls, away from those who truly need to feel its heat.

 

And then there is the arguement that one will find the " flame " when it is

time...well what happens when one finds that flame and they are over 30?

They have lost their taste for the world, yet they still must live in it.

It's extremely difficult at times, yet, at present, I see no way

out...especially in America, and especially for women. At least a man can

become a wanderer...but that's ot really feaseable for a women.

 

Sue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...