Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

(No subject)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Namaste Jayanti:

 

yes it has been a long time...since we last communicated i have heard

so much about you from other members of the Ramakrishna family of

the courage you display on a daily basis... and i am always truly

inspired when i remember you...

 

regarding your response to the monk and the butcher...i agree with all

you say..but i am, i suppose looking at it from a diferent

perspective..that is all.. please let me share that perspective with

you in light of all that you say,...

 

> Firstly, because no monk need be present for the butcher to guess

> which way the cow went, I do not believe that the monk is involved

> in the butcher's guessing correctly.

 

i agree and i did not mean that the monk would be responsible if he

were to keep quiet...all i meant was, if the monk remained silent and

the butcher did guess correctly, the monk would lament the killing,

yet feel " secure " that he had stuck to the path of righteousness...and

so ensure his journey to heaven. The motive behind his keeping quiet

would be to ensure that he does not stray from the path of dharma ...a

self-centered motive... as it ensures that he attains salvation...all

self-centered directives...

 

> Secondly, you present three potentially contradictory situations:

> 1. The monk's commitment to truth 2. The value of protecting the

> cow 3. The butcher's need to make a living.

>

> Has not the monk reconciled all of these by the twin action of

> acknowledging to the butcher that he knows which way the cow went,

> but refuses to tell him?

>

> Simple truth would say, " Yes, the cow went that way. " The monk does

> not lie, nor does he simply tell the truth. Rather he takes the

> action to protect the cow which is within his power. He does this

> boldly by stating that he knows, but will not tell! We are seldom

> so brave or bold!

>

> At the same time, the future is free to play out as it is meant to.

> The monk has taking a firm stand in principle without the folly of

> trying to control the outcome. Should the butcher become angry and

> beat him, the monk will stand firm accepting the beating as God's

> will.. Likewise, should the butcher run off after the cow, this too

> is God's will.

>

> Is this sitting on the fence? I think we let our attachment to

> outcome blind us to effective action. We decide HOW a situation MUST

> play out, and become determined to MAKE this happen whether we have

> the ability to do so or not. As a result we often sacrifice our

> principles and integrity in the process. We become weak and

> ineffective by not recognizing the source of the power within our

> reach. And we bring in awareness of conflict, rather than

> leaving/trusting the outcome to unfold as the Divine or Nature

> wills.

>

> If by chance the monk IS to save the cow, what is more be powerful

> than to stand before the butcher and declare, " Yes, I know where the

> cow is, but I will tell you. "

>

> Sincerely,

> Jayanti

 

 

again i agree with all that you say...but if i were given the CHOICE

of worshipping a monk as an IDEAL between a monk who chooses your

suggested course of action or a monk who LIES knowing that he lies

only to save the cow and at the same time helps the butcher get an

alternative repast and means of livelihood, even if it be at the

expense of the monk arranging to do so through the sacrifice of his

own time and maybe even life, i would ALWAYS, choose the latter monk

as my IDEAL and GURU...for the latter monk who lied, is not only

making the ultimate sacrifice of foregoing his most cherished goal of

salvation in the 'next world' but also paying it for in this life by

devoting his life to meet the butcher's needs.

 

For deep down although he may recognize the cruelty of killing an

innocent cow he also recognizes the butcher's legitimate needs...

 

as i said, i agree with you fully, only that i see it in a different

perspective.

 

namaskar to you Jayanti...

 

by the way...did i ever thank you enough for allowing me to use the

sacred pictures of the Master, Swamiji and The Holy Mother that you

had for your web based shrines...for the Sangam? i dont think i did

adequately...i know that was a tough decision for you and i did

appreciate it immeasurably.

 

pranaams

jairam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...