Guest guest Posted April 24, 2001 Report Share Posted April 24, 2001 Hello Everyone, The teaching that all sense of individuality is maya or illusion in Advaita Vedtanta is somewhat unsettling to me. I can logically agree with its concepts and theories but the thought of eventually giving up one's individuality is somewhat scary as the sense of " I " as a distinct and seperate personality from " you " is all I have ever known. Is it for this reason that the teachings of Advaita are usually extremely difficult to grasp for the neophyte Vedantist? If God is both personal (in the form of Kali for example) and impersonal (as brahman or the absolute) does this mean that the impersonal manifests itself in the personal (as Kali)? But according to the teachings of Advaita wouldn't the notion of Kali herself as seperate from our true self be merely an illusion or trick of maya? Why did Ramakrishna choose to see Kali as " Mother " when he was certainly aware that on the Advaita Vedantic level he and the Divine Mother were one and the same? Did he remain at the level between these 2 modes of thought so he could act as a bridge between them in order to better help his disciples during their spiritual journeys? Does all of Vedanta eventually come to the level of Advaita, where one realizes the distinction between the Atman and Brahman is false? Take care everyone, Jeremy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.