Digest Number 820

[Guest guest]

Jay wrote:

> I do not claim to be an 'Advaiti' in any sense. I have yet to

> meet a real 'advaiti'. All 'advaitis' I have met so far

> have no clue about what they are dealing with. Apart from

> doing little mental gymnastics that give them a kind of intellectual

> kick they do very little else.

 

Dear Jay,

This is a bit too harsh on advaitins. One does not meet an advaitin, one

become an advaitin. Then and then only he/she can recognize other

advaitin; for the language of advaita is language of becoming.

No other words can ever reveal advaita; for advaita state transcends or

devours mind and language.

 

And would you say that you have not met Thakur?

*

 

c s shah

http://www.neovedanta.org

----

[Guest guest]

---- Original Message -----

" c s shah " <drcssha

<Ramakrishna >

Thursday, June 21, 2001 06:30

Digest Number 820

 

 

> Jay wrote:

> > I do not claim to be an 'Advaiti' in any sense. I have yet to

> > meet a real 'advaiti'. All 'advaitis' I have met so far

> > have no clue about what they are dealing with. Apart from

> > doing little mental gymnastics that give them a kind of intellectual

> > kick they do very little else.

>

> Dear Jay,

> This is a bit too harsh on advaitins. One does not meet an advaitin, one

> become an advaitin. Then and then only he/she can recognize other

> advaitin; for the language of advaita is language of becoming.

> No other words can ever reveal advaita; for advaita state transcends or

> devours mind and language.

>

> And would you say that you have not met Thakur?

> *

 

Dear Dr Shah

 

Do you really think I have met Thakur ?

What more can one ask for? Dvaita / Advaita who cares?

 

jay : )