Guest guest Posted September 12, 2001 Report Share Posted September 12, 2001 Dear C. S. Shah: I prefered your previous article. Namaste, Brad Stephan - " c s shah " <drcssha " c s shah " <drcsshah Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:46 PM [sri Ramakrishna] Re: The Inevitable Tragedy > Dear friends, > Please change the previous article with this one. Please. > c s shah > * > The Inevitable Tragedy > > 11th September and the world was stunned by the ghastly terrorist attack > on the 'symbol' of civilized world of free market economy and > materialistic masterpiece. The USA is shocked beyond description, and so > is the world. The terrorists had their day; their mission accomplished. > Helpless onlookers panicked, and later must have withdrawn within > themselves to ponder over the compulsions of such a step. Why, why? This > must be the beleaguering question they must have put to themselves, > which can never be answered. > > For, we are not yet ready to accept the answer that is beyond the realm > of common concepts of human mind. Religious terrorism and fanaticism > springs from the conceptual belief in certain philosophy. Religious > faith of fanatics is intolerant to any metaphysical thought other than > their own. They are determined to attack those whose ways and means of > lifestyle, thinking, and economic activities do not conform to their > style and faith. Their commitment is indeed great, but misdirected and > misguided. Their faith is indeed unshakable, but intensely narrow. The > inevitable thus had to happen. And such limited vision is incongruous > with modern human civilization. > > The answer, utopian it might appear, lies in making ourselves conversant > with the true and higher metaphysics of spirituality. Why should I not > only tolerate but also accept other religious faith? Answer to this > question must be sought with all sincerity and self-analysis. What is > that, which is common between one human and the other? Why should I love > you? What makes you and I one? It is not the color of skin, physical > characteristics, material possession, or anything outside. All these > features differ from person to person, from race to race, community to > community, and society to society. > > Then what is the common binding principle that should convince me not > only to tolerate but also to accept others as my own? The only answer > is, because you and I are the same God, Brahman. Absolute Consciousness > is our true nature. We are potentially divine and that Divinity has no > compartments or divisions; it is one uninterrupted infinite > Consciousness, Truth, Existence, Knowledge, and Bliss. This is Advaita > preached in the final analysis by every religion, although everyone does > not delve deep into it and understand it. The divinity is potential, and > hence the aim of life should be to experience the full manifestation of > this Advaita Oneness, for then only compassion, love, generosity, and > co-existence become our automatic choice. No force works against such > belief and truth of oneness. Can one cut or hurt oneself! No! In hurting > others I hurt myself, in loving others I love myself! Thus, Advaita and > Advaita alone would be and could be the basis for future universal > religion. The task appears insurmountable, and almost impossible, but > there is no other choice. > * > > c s shah > ---- > > > > Sri Ramakrishnaye Namah > Vivekananda Centre London > http://www.vivekananda.co.uk > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.