Guest guest Posted October 30, 2001 Report Share Posted October 30, 2001 Earlier post from Kendra asking about 'Siddha of Siddhas.... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ " Kendra Crossen Burroughs " <kcburroughs Could someone say something more about the distinction between the siddha and the " siddha of the siddha " (see Gospel passage below)? In English one cannot properly speak of *degrees* of perfection--one is either perfect or not. In what way is the siddha of the siddha " more perfect " than the siddha? << " There is another type, known as the siddha of the siddha, the 'supremely perfect'. It is quite a different thing when one talks to the master intimately, when one knows God very intimately through love and devotion. A siddha has undoubtedly attained God, but the 'supremely perfect' has known God very intimately. " >> (p. 114) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~response~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ " In English one cannot properly speak of *degrees* of perfection--one is either perfect or not " Technically in English (or in any other language) the moment we assign the word 'perfection' to describe anything; we have already imposed a 'degree' to it. This happens due to the limitations of tools, perceptions or even definitions (however pristine they might be) we have imposed or are forced to impose on anything. So 'something is perfect' is a contradiction. A 'degree' enters into the discussion without waiting for our permission : ) Hence the superlative Sri Ramakrishna is using like 'Siddha of Siddhas' is talking about a greater 'degree' of intimacy. Only a God man of his stature can pass such remarks - it is beyond me to try and explain levels of intimacy with God! But there is no contradiction in what he is saying. We have to use utmost caution when we attempt to analyse the teachings of Sri Ramakrishna. Please bear in mind everything Sri Ramakrishna taught was in context. The advice he gave to any individual or any group was tailor-made. Hence we have to be careful when we read the Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna. In fact in some instances one gets clearer insights into his teachings by studying 'The Great Master' written by Swami Sharadananda. In this book Swami Shardananda has attempted to interpret the life and teachings of Sri Ramakrishna (no easy task but the disciple has done justice to his Master). jay Vivekananda Centre London Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2001 Report Share Posted October 30, 2001 Namaste, Another way of interpreting the phrase 'siddha of siddhas' is in the context of achieving the 'siddhis' [perfection] through many different paths. As Sri Aurobindo remarked about Thakur, for most of us we may achieve the goal in one life-time by pursuing one single method; Ramakrishna pursued as many as ? 16 [ref. 16 disciples] and reached siddhahood in each! Thakur himself said, 'if you follow just one-sixteenth of my sadhana you will reach your goal'. [the 16 he referred to, was also to the number of 'annas' that made up the basic monetary unit 'rupee' at that time!] Regards, Sunder Ramakrishna, " Vivekananda Centre " <vivekananda@b...> wrote: > > Earlier post from Kendra asking about 'Siddha of Siddhas.... > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.