Guest guest Posted November 5, 2001 Report Share Posted November 5, 2001 In Chapter 10 (Verse 25) of Gita Krishna says that among sacrifices I am Japa (repetition of Lords name). While there is no ambiguity in the scriptures about the importance of Japa which on its own is capable of taking an aspirant from start to finish on the spiritual path, my question is why was it mentioned as a sacrifice (Yagna) by Lord Krishna? Why not as a spiritual practise ? Also does it mean that Japa was accorded a higher status than meditation as a spiritual practise? And the other thing is that while Krishna spoke extensively on the technique of meditation there is no mention of technique of Japa. Now I am not questioning the wisdom of Krishna and he knew best what to talk but it is just a curiosity for an answer. Regards Dev Find a job, post your resume. http://careers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 5, 2001 Report Share Posted November 5, 2001 Namaste, There would seem to be at least 2 reasons for this glorification: 1. yajna has the constraints of time, place, and materials. 2. meditation has the possible constraints of time & place. japa is the CONSTANT thought-flow ['tailavat'] on the divine : ['tasmaat sarveshhu kaaleshhu maam anusmara' 'yo maaM smarati nityashaH' 'yatkaroshhi yadashnaasi yajjuhoshhi dadaasi yat.h . yattapasyasi kaunteya tatkurushhva madarpaNam.h ..'] In other words, it is an uninterrupted 'maanasa-puujaa', which is regarded as the highest form of worship. Regards, Sunder Ramakrishna, DEVINDER AHUJA <devahuja> wrote: > In Chapter 10 (Verse 25) of Gita Krishna says that > among sacrifices I am Japa (repetition of Lords name). > > While there is no ambiguity in the scriptures about > the importance of Japa which on its own is capable of > taking an aspirant from start to finish on the > spiritual path, my question is why was it mentioned as > a sacrifice (Yagna) by Lord Krishna? Why not as a > spiritual practise ? > > Also does it mean that Japa was accorded a higher > status than meditation as a spiritual practise? And > the other thing is that while Krishna spoke > extensively on the technique of meditation there is no > mention of technique of Japa. Now I am not questioning > the wisdom of Krishna and he knew best what to talk > but it is just a curiosity for an answer. > > Regards > > Dev > > > > > Find a job, post your resume. > http://careers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.