Guest guest Posted January 30, 2002 Report Share Posted January 30, 2002 My answer to the questions will be as under: Q 1. " What do you say about compassion in Hinduism - it does not agree with my experience of visiting Kali temple in Calcutta with blood and sacrifice and destruction everywhere.... " A1. Hindu compassion is best depicted in its respect for all religions and even to those who criticise Hinduism. Hindus have never issues fatavs (death warrants) against non-hindus or never have taken the attitude of one upmanship. Hinduism has many forms of worship. The sacrifices at the Kali temple are one of the ways in which some followers believe. This is not the whole of Hinduism. In most other temples there are no such sacrifices in temple precints hence to point out sacrifices at a particular temple to prove a point is incorrect. Q2 " How can a nation talk of divinity in man and also have the caste system? " A2. The question is an example of crooked thinking. Divinity is a spiritual concept, caste is a social concept. All Hindu gods are of the lower caste. Ram was Kshatriya, Krishna an 'other backward class', SHiva a tribal, and so on and so forth. Indian History is full of Kings which were of lower castes. Indian History generally begins with Chandragupta Maurya who was a untouchable. Why caste persists? Ask Indian politicians. They will like it to persist that is the way to power. At the level of ordinary man it is soon disappearing. Look what it was some years back and what it is today. Intercaste marriages were unheard of some years back now probably it is most common thing. Again why do Christians have a caste system? Why churches for black are saperate? why lower caste Hindu's who have converted to Christianity still practice caste system? Q3 " Idea of evil as cause of suffering is far better than the Hindu or Buddhist ideas of progress of living things towards the final goal where suffering is overcome by realising the ultimate reality " A3. To say far better is being judgemental. who decides this? I don't think the idea of evil is far better I find it to be very childish concept that can appeal to people with lesser intelligence. Once you start branding people as 'evil' you start the blame game. why blame any one else rather than oneself? Just as charity begins at home all reforms begin with self and hence the Hindu idea is intellectually most appealing. Vivekananda Centre [vivekananda] Wednesday, 30 January 2002 10:36 AM list [sri Ramakrishna] Fireworks..... Dear list I have made it a habit of sharing some of my experiences in London with the list. The experience tonight was a kind of fireworks show : ) I was asked by the London Interfaith to talk to a group of 20 Church of England Ministers at their College on the role of Interfaith. On Saturday I gave them a talk on 'pluralism' and how it can help with interfaith ideals. That was extremely well received. The group could not stop clapping..... But then something or someone may have become concerned.. So the meeting we had tonight focused not only on the new topic being covered which was 'Respect for life in Hinduism' but also on 'other questions' they wished to ask of Hinduism.... So I was waiting for some pointed questions, and they came hard and fast. I have always taught our youngsters that you should not only know the strengths of all religions but also their weaknesses. When you encounter people of other faiths you sometimes need a sword as well as a shield. Well today I had to use the sword of 'Vivekananda' in no uncertain manner. It is not the pointed questions that worry me . I have dealt with these questions in a very polite manner many a times in the past. It was the mannerism in which they are asked that was not acceptable! Well the questions as you can imagine were something like: " What do you say about compassion in Hinduism - it does not agree with my experience of visiting Kali temple in Calcutta with blood and sacrifice and destruction everywhere.... " " How can a nation talk of divinity in man and also have the caste system? " " Idea of evil as cause of suffering is far better than the Hindu or Buddhist ideas of progress of living things towards the final goal where suffering is overcome by realising the ultimate reality " Questions came hard and fast and the way they were put across can best be described as a serious put-down of Hinduism in favour of Christianity. Well I stood my ground and with clenched teeth, let fly without any reservations...... I think and hope our mentor is : ) jay Vivekananda Centre London Sri Ramakrishnaye Namah Vivekananda Centre London http://www.vivekananda.co.uk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2002 Report Share Posted January 30, 2002 Hi, Since the subject is on defending our religion i thought i would add a point i stumbled upon. When the great kanchi paramacharya was asked the same question of how to defend our religion against others he said - the best way is to live the religion , for everyone to become what our religion proclaims as the end. and as swamiji often used to say that it is personalities who move the world and not philosophies. -Raj > My answer to the questions will be as under:................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.