Guest guest Posted February 18, 2002 Report Share Posted February 18, 2002 My Dearest all, Neither am i a PURE bhaktha nor am i a PURE jnanin. But comparing to my even much more IGNORANT days i feel the bhakthi in me has increased qualitatively & quantifiably. The incidences in m personal life prove the same for me. So i believe shall be for others. Ignorant as iam, i do not understand " WHO am i? " " brahman " nor " atman " , but listening to and even more, singing, chanting and bhajans of HIS glorious name send shivers in me and sometimes try to hypocratically stop a few tears that roll down! i lead my life in complete faith and belief that the time will surely pass when this ignorance shall be swept aside and knowledge would have been discovered! For your kind reference, i seek inspiration from " Sayings of Sri Ramakrishna " an exhaustive collection where the below discussed point of bhakth and jnana are clearly explained by our master. Pg 215- Bhakthi and jnana the same in the end. Pg 216- How Bhakthi leads to jnana. kindly excuse me for the usage of " i " quiet a number of times. love -P - SRK Child <srkchild <Ramakrishna > Monday, February 18, 2002 5:12 PM Re: Re: [sri Ramakrishna] Re: the bhagavad gita > Dear Karthikeyan - > > First of all - I was not at all trying to prove about my knowledge. If you think it sounded like that then I am sorry. > > Yes I agree without any doubt that the SELF must be realized and cant be read in any book or scripture but when the discussion was in accordance with some reference from books, I just raised my opinion or views. I hope there should not be any problem about sharing views openly. I hope you will take it lightly and correct me if I am wrong ... > > Sincerely, > > srkchild > - > Karthikeyan C S > Ramakrishna > Monday, February 18, 2002 12:10 AM > Re: Re: [sri Ramakrishna] Re: the bhagavad gita > > > > Dear Sri SRK Child, > You seem to be quite emotional.You are right both Gnana and Bhakti are the paths for self realisation. > I'm sorry to say that you were just trying to prove that have more knowledge about spirituality.We are not here for any dispute.We are trying to clarify certain people's doubts. > Here I would like to emphasize unequivocally that " SELF " is not in all these books and theories;You have to realise through practice. > > bhajagovindaM bhajagovindaM > govindaM bhajamuuDhamate . > saMpraapte sannihite kaale > nahi nahi rakshati DukR^iJNkaraNe > > Sincerely yours, > Karthikeyan > > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 SRK Child wrote : > > NO. I think you cant actually say that Jnana is > > superior than Bhakti and it comes AFTER Bhakti. These > > are two distinct ways to reach the ultimate goal. They > > cant be actually compared. > > > > Also what about something in Gita itself when Bhagwan > > Krishna says that - Bhakti is greater than Jnana or > > Yoga ??? I dont remember the exact chapter ... > > > > Great Maharashtrian Saint and Philosopher Jnaneshwara > > also says in his 'Jnaneshwari' that 'para-bhakti' is > > greater than anything i.e. greater the Yoga and Jnana > > even when he himself was a great Yogi/Jnani as well as > > a great Bhakta. > > > > Let me know what you all think about this. Any more > > specific references ??? > > > > Regards. > > > > Jai Sri Ramakrishna !!! > > > > srkchild. > > > > - > > Karthikeyan C S > > list > > Cc: Vivekananda Centre ; toni nelson > > Friday, February 15, 2002 5:04 PM > > Re: [sri Ramakrishna] Re: the bhagavad gita > > > > > > > > Dear Toni Nelson, > > According to what I have understood about Adi Sankara, > > he didn't say that Bhakti is inferior to Jnana.He only > > said that Bhakti was prior to Jnana.That means Jnana is > > the ultimate truth;bhakti is the means of attaining > > that jnana.This also includes Karma. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Sincerely, > > Karthikeyan > > > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 Vivekananda Centre wrote : > > > > > > - > > > " toni nelson " <the_tribulation > > > Thursday, February 14, 2002 01:41 > > > the bhagavad gita > > > > > > > > > sir/madam > > > > > > i am presently studying hinduism at nailsea school > > and > > > we are looking at > > > the bhagavad gita and it's views on bhakti and > > karma > > > yoga. in my > > > essay i have to include sankara's popularisation of > > the > > > gita, his > > > views on bhakti and karma yoga, and views prior to > > him. > > > to me there seems to be a contradiction. zaehner's > > > introduction to > > > hinduism comments on how sankara thought bhakti was > > > inferior to jnana. > > > This contrasts what my tutor taught us about how > > > sankara changed these > > > traditional ideas by popularising the gita. i'd > > really > > > appreciate your > > > help as my essays due in on monday! no worries if > > you > > > haven't the time! > > > > > > > toni nelson > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~response~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > Dear Toni > > > > > > Your question is very interesting.... We will ask > > some > > > of our > > > list members to resond to you directly or via our > > list. > > > I am pretty sure you will get very interesting > > > answers.... > > > > > > jay Vivekananda Centre London > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 18, 2002 Report Share Posted February 18, 2002 My dear friends! This would be interesting to read pertaining to bhakti and jnana... http://kamakoti.org/bhaja/bhaja.html Regards, Srikanth. --- Prashanth <varanasinp wrote: <HR> <html><body> <tt> My Dearest all,<BR> <BR> Neither am i a PURE bhaktha nor am i a PURE jnanin. But comparing to my even<BR> much more IGNORANT days i feel the bhakthi in me has increased qualitatively<BR> & amp; quantifiably. The incidences in m personal life prove the same for me. So<BR> i believe shall be for others.<BR> <BR> Ignorant as iam, i do not understand & quot;WHO am i? & quot; & quot;brahman & quot; nor & quot;atman & quot;,<BR> but listening to and even more, singing, chanting and bhajans of HIS<BR> glorious name send shivers in me and sometimes try to hypocratically stop a<BR> few tears that roll down!<BR> i lead my life in complete faith and belief that the time will surely pass<BR> when this ignorance shall be swept aside and knowledge would have been<BR> discovered!<BR> <BR> For your kind reference,<BR> i seek inspiration from & quot;Sayings of Sri Ramakrishna & quot; an exhaustive<BR> collection & nbsp; where the below discussed point of bhakth and jnana are clearly<BR> explained by our master.<BR> Pg 215- Bhakthi and jnana the same in the end.<BR> Pg 216- How Bhakthi leads to jnana.<BR> <BR> kindly excuse me for the usage of & quot;i & quot; quiet a number of times.<BR> <BR> love<BR> -P<BR> <BR> <BR> -<BR> SRK Child & lt;srkchild & gt;<BR> & lt;Ramakrishna & gt;<BR> Monday, February 18, 2002 5:12 PM<BR> Re: Re: [sri Ramakrishna] Re: the bhagavad gita<BR> <BR> <BR> & gt; Dear Karthikeyan -<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt; First of all - I was not at all trying to prove about my knowledge. If you<BR> think it sounded like that then I am sorry.<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt; Yes I agree without any doubt that the SELF must be realized and cant be<BR> read in any book or scripture but when the discussion was in accordance with<BR> some reference from books, I just raised my opinion or views. I hope there<BR> should not be any problem about sharing views openly. I hope you will take<BR> it lightly and correct me if I am wrong ...<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt; Sincerely,<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt; srkchild<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; -<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Karthikeyan C S<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Ramakrishna <BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Monday, February 18, 2002 12:10 AM<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Re: Re: [sri Ramakrishna] Re: the bhagavad gita<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Dear Sri SRK Child,<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; You seem to be quite emotional.You are right both Gnana and Bhakti are<BR> the paths for self realisation.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; I'm sorry to say that you were just trying to prove that have more<BR> knowledge about spirituality.We are not here for any dispute.We are trying<BR> to clarify certain people's doubts.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Here I would like to emphasize unequivocally that & quot;SELF & quot; is not in all<BR> these books and theories;You have to realise through practice.<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; bhajagovindaM bhajagovindaM<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; govindaM bhajamuuDhamate .<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; saMpraapte sannihite kaale<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; nahi nahi rakshati DukR^iJNkaraNe<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Sincerely yours,<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Karthikeyan<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 SRK Child wrote :<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; NO. I think you cant actually say that Jnana is<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; superior than Bhakti and it comes AFTER Bhakti. These<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; are two distinct ways to reach the ultimate goal. They<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; cant be actually compared.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Also what about something in Gita itself when Bhagwan<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Krishna says that - Bhakti is greater than Jnana or<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Yoga ??? I dont remember the exact chapter ...<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Great Maharashtrian Saint and Philosopher Jnaneshwara<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; also says in his 'Jnaneshwari' that 'para-bhakti' is<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; greater than anything i.e. greater the Yoga and Jnana<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; even when he himself was a great Yogi/Jnani as well as<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; a great Bhakta.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Let me know what you all think about this. Any more<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; specific references ???<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Regards.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Jai Sri Ramakrishna !!!<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; srkchild.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; -<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Karthikeyan C S<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; list<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Cc: Vivekananda Centre ; toni nelson<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Friday, February 15, 2002 5:04 PM<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Re: [sri Ramakrishna] Re: the bhagavad gita<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Dear Toni Nelson,<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; According to what I have understood about Adi Sankara,<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; he didn't say that Bhakti is inferior to Jnana.He only<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; said that Bhakti was prior to Jnana.That means Jnana is<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; the ultimate truth;bhakti is the means of attaining<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; that jnana.This also includes Karma.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Thank you.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Sincerely,<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; Karthikeyan<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 Vivekananda Centre wrote :<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; ----- Original Message -----<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & quot;toni nelson & quot; & lt;the_tribulation & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Thursday, February 14, 2002 01:41<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; the bhagavad gita<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; sir/madam<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; i am presently studying hinduism at nailsea school<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; and<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; we are looking at<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; the bhagavad gita and it's views on bhakti and<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; karma<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; yoga. in my<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; essay i have to include sankara's popularisation of<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; the<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; gita, his<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; views on bhakti and karma & nbsp; yoga, and views prior to<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; him.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; to me there seems to be a contradiction. zaehner's<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; introduction to<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; hinduism comments on how sankara thought bhakti was<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; inferior to jnana.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; This contrasts what my tutor taught us about how<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; sankara changed these<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; traditional ideas by popularising the gita. i'd<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; really<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; appreciate your<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; help as my essays due in on monday! no worries if<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; you<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; haven't the time!<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & gt; toni nelson<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~response~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Dear Toni<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Your question is very interesting.... We will ask<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; some<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; of our<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; list members to resond to you directly or via our<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; list.<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; I am pretty sure you will get very interesting<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; answers....<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; jay & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; & nbsp; Vivekananda Centre London<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt;<BR> & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; & nbsp; & nbsp; & gt; Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.