Guest guest Posted December 26, 2007 Report Share Posted December 26, 2007 PURNAMADAH PURNAMIDAM Om purnamadah purnamidam purnat purnamudacyate purnasya purnamadaya purnamevavasisyate Completeness is that, completeness is this From completeness, completeness comes forth. Completeness from completeness taken away Completeness to completeness added Completeness alone remains. This is an innocuous looking verse: one noun, two pronouns, three verbs and a particle for emphasis. Yet someone once said: " Let all the upanisads disappear from the face of the earth – I don't mind so long as this one verse remains. " Idam means `this', something directly known or knowable. Adah means `that', something remote from the speaker in time, place or understanding, but can be known upon destruction of the remoteness. Thus, adah `that' becomes idam `this', as soon as the remoteness is destroyed. So when the verse says – purnaam adah- purnam idam, what is being said is that all that one knows or is knowable is purnam. Since idam has been used for all knowable objects, presently known or unknown, the only meaning left for adah is to indicate the subject aham or `I', which is not available for objectification. So the real meaning of adah is `I', that is, atman, which is jneya- vastu, something to be known. Purnam, completeness The nature of purnam is wholeness, complete, limitless. Purnam can never be plus or minus something. It is impossible to add to or take away from limitlessness. Purnam is absolute fullness, which cannot be anything other than Brahaman. Purnam cannot have a form because it has to include everything. Absolute completeness requires formlessness. Brahman and purnam have to be identical: there can be only one limitless and that One is formless. But when one looks around, one sees various kinds of forms. In fact, one cannot perceive the formless. How can then idam, which stands for all objectifiable things, is purnam – formless? Punam also means non-duality – no second thing. But we see nothing but duality. The sloka uses two pronouns adah and idam to recognize our experience of duality around us, but wants us to understand this experience as non- real not as non-existent. The sloka contradicts the conclusion of duality, which we experience, by stating that both `I' and `this' are One – purnam. It may be noted that what is here called purnam is defined elsewhere in the scriptures as Brahman. Further, the sloka says: purnat – from (adah) purnam, completeness, which is limitless Brahman – purnam – (idam) purnam, completeness, which is the known and knowable (the world) udacyate – comes forth. In cause-effect relationship the efficient cause does not undergo a material change. But for the material cause, some kind of change constitutes the very production of the effect. What kind of change can formless and limitless undergo to produce `formful' limitless? The only kind of change that the limitless can accommodate is the kind of change which gold undergoes to become various types of ornaments: svarnat svarnam – from gold, gold (comes forth) . Purnat purnam – from completeness, completeness. Purnam remains untouched, but an appearance comes forth. Purnam does not undergo any intrinsic change, but idam comes about; just as gold undergoing no intrinsic change, various gold ornaments come about; or as the dreamer undergoes no change, the dream objects come about. Another example: the cloth is cotton. Then what came about? Cloth. Does that mean that here are now two things, cotton and cloth? No. Just one thing. Cotton is there. Cloth comes. Cotton is still there. Cotton and cloth – cotton appearing as cloth – are one single non-dual reality. That is all creation is about. The effect is but a form of the cause. Purnasya purnam adaya: taking away purnam from purnam, adding purnam to purnam purnam eva avaisyate -- purnam alone remains. Adaya can mean either taking away from or adding to -- whether we take away idam (formful object purnam) from adah(formless I, Brahman purnam) or whether we add (idam) purnam to (adah) purnam, purnam alone will be there. The statement is to make clear the fact that whether anything is added to or taken away from purnam makes no difference. Any `adding to' or `taking away' is purely an appearance. Even at the empirical level of reality, physics confirms indestructibility of the matter and lack of difference between object and object, all of which are only aggregations of atomic particles. The sloka contains the vision of the upanisads . The reality of `I' is limitless purnam -- into which all appearances resolve. I am purnam – a brimful ocean. Waves and breakers may seem to be many and different but are appearances only. `I', purnam , completeness, alone remain. (Abstracted from Purnamadah Purnamidam by Swami Dayananda.) prof laxmi narain (prof_narain) Source and courtesy: Sri Ramana Kendram, Hyderabad This article was published in Sri Ramana Jyothi, monthly magazine of the Kendram. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.