Philosophy and Science

[Guest guest]

Philosophy and Science

 

 

 

 

 

" Is this concept scientific ? "

 

I have been seeing and hearing this above question ever since I started

attending school. This validating has reached such a frenzy that even

religious concepts are no exception. In fact, in today's India ,

religion is the first thing to be questioned.

 

 

 

We note that it is philosophy that is questioned since it is what makes

up a religion. Is this process of validation correct ? Is philosophy

below science or above it ? Let us see here.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Science

 

[bLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5261138021734955266]

<http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_yhxoh42e1IM/SQNRJ_PQOQI/AAAAAAAABAU/ajUvRk3Pb\

bY/s1600-h/images+11.jpg>

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is science ? Science is the description of naturally occurring

phenomena and of comparing the same with universal laws (like law of

gravity, law of motion, etc)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Philosophy

 

 

 

 

 

 

Philosophy is the understanding of life, the relationship between man

and the creation, finding the answers to some eternal questions like,

" why am I born? " , " why am I made this way ? " " why

are people not equally born ? " " why is there so much pain in

this world ? " etc and so on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Validation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the eighteenth century, there arose a movement in Europe , that asked

for scientific proof for everything proposed including science. The

Industrial Revolution had started and people thought that they had to be

scientific in whatever they did. For example, the biblical theory of

creation in 4004 BC was put to severe questioning and discarded. This is

on the realm of mythology. But philosophy also was put to the same test.

 

 

 

The most suffered concept was of God Himself. Science was throwing

postulates after another in the form of Big Bang theory, nebula theory

and so on and was denying the concept of a creator God. Added to this

was the theory of evolution which said that every organism had the

capacity to evolve and suggested the possibility of evolution from a

single celled organism.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Science or Philosophy ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

The plight of the common man was understandable. He was driven to

despair in knowing that the religion he dearly loved is no longer

scientific. He pondered over what may be truth. I was also one of such

people. My convictions steadied once I saw through the history of

science.

 

 

 

What was consistent in the history is that there have been a spate of

theories one criticizing another and superseding it. The atomic concept

of Dalton is no longer valid now. Newton 's laws of motion are no

longer universal since Einstein proved the theory of relativity and

showed that a moving clock indeed runs slower.

 

 

 

What do all the above indicate ? It is, that science is still on its way

to finding the secrets of creation and CANNOT be in a position to decide

whether a religious concept is correct or not. In other words, science

itself is in evolution towards perfection.

 

 

 

In the 18 th century Europe , Micael Faraday loathed the term

`scientist' and wanted to be called as `natural

philosopher'. Why ? The answer is, till that time, science was

considered part of philosophy. It was only after that period that the

scientist started to look down upon philosophy.

 

 

 

The greatest drawback in scientific enquiry is that it is an utter flop

in matters regarding purpose of life on earth ,the reasons for creation,

and the intelligent design of life on this universe. These are BIG

questions of life and till date science has never even tried to answer

them.

 

 

 

And the tragedy was that the Christian led primitive theories were

simply not able to stand the scrutiny of scientific enquiry.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christian Philosophy and science:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christianity, with its God in heaven theory, cut a sorry figure. Swamy

Vivekananda asked, if God is in Heaven , where is it ? If it is

somewhere in this Universe , then you must be suggesting that the heaven

is occupying space.

 

 

 

Whatever occupies space is matter. Matter is subject to change. It means

birth and death. So the Heaven and God must be subject to birth and

death. They become limited, which is absurd.

 

 

 

Their satan theory was far worse. The satan meant that there was another

force (and in turn energy) independent of God, thus making God limited.

Anything limited is not absolute and hence God , according to the

semitic theories, becomes limited.

 

 

 

Einstein proved that the sum total of all energies in this universe at

any point of time is the same. The semitic religions never could explain

what happens when a man dies. They propagate the concept that this man

himself is the spirit. When the creation is one man short, what happens

to this universal energy balance ? Does this energy go to God ? And

their God in Heaven must be so heavy with all the souls' energy

since the time of creation !

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hindu Philosophy:

[bLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5261138099321330610]

<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_yhxoh42e1IM/SQNROgRSW7I/AAAAAAAABAc/NvwOwb3HE\

oI/s1600-h/rishi.jpg>

 

 

On the other hand Hinduistic philosophy answered all questions

effectively. Sankara's advaita shines like a brilliant star among

the religious postulates of the world. Sankara said `there are no

two'. It means, creation and creator are not different. The name of

`sachhidananda' (sat-chit-ananda) meaning existence-

conciousness- bliss for God is so apt. It means there is existence for

none other than this trio of existence – consciousness- bliss.

 

There is a Vedic Hymn which reads

 

 

 

Om

 

Purnamada: purnamidam purnAt purnamudachyate |

 

Purnasya purnamAdAya, purnameva avasishyate ||

 

 

 

( Om. That is whole. This is whole. From the whole (this) whole emerges.

Even after (this) whole emerges from (that) whole, the whole alone

remains.)

 

 

 

There is oneness only. No two. Such is the depth and subtlety of Hindu

Philosophy.

 

 

 

Also the theory of reincarnation has fantastically explained why there

will be energy balance even after death.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Science or Philosophy- which is superior ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

The God theory has one extraordinary condition. Many thinkers attained a

stage from where they claim they have unravelled the secrets about

themselves, God and creation in general. But without exception they all

declared that that experience is beyond the human faculties of senses,

mind and intellect !

 

 

 

But people still harp on science being the ultimate judge even in the

realm of spiritual philosophy. Swamy Vivenakanda declared thus

 

" When that energy from which al the energies of the universe

emanate, is found, then all study in Physics will come to a close "

 

 

 

" When that substance is known, from which every other substance is

made, Chemistry attains its completion "

 

 

 

" When the source of all thought is found out, psychology will see

its perfection "

 

 

 

" When that knowledge is known, knowing which everything is known,

the quest of a Gnani is fulfilled "

 

 

 

(the last two are mine)

 

 

 

That endpoint is what Hindu Philosophy calls the " Godhead " or

" Realisation " . Science , with its limited tools of inquiry, can

scarcely dream of such things.

 

 

 

So what do we conclude ? That Science is Bigger than Philosophy ? It is

just the reverse. Science is just a subset of Philosophy. This gives it

a due place. That is also the great Indian tradition.

 

 

 

 

--

Posted By Venkatasubramanian to Sanatana Pages

<http://sanatanavenkat.blogspot.com/2008/10/philosophy-and-science.html>

at 10/25/2008 09:59:00 AM