THE IDEAL OF A UNIVERSAL RELIGION By Swami Vivekananda

[Guest guest]

We all hear about universal brotherhood, and how societies stand up

especially to preach this. I remember an old story. In India, taking wine is

considered very bad. There were two brothers who wished, one night, to drink

wine secretly; and their uncle, who was a very orthodox man was sleeping in

a room quite close to theirs. So, before they began to drink, they said to

each other, " We must be very silent, or uncle will wake up. "

 

When they were drinking, they continued repeating to each other " Silence!

Uncle will wake up " , each trying to shout the other down. And, as the

shouting increased, the uncle woke up, came into the room, and discovered

the whole thing. Now, we all shout like these drunken men, " Universal

brotherhood! We are all equal, therefore let us make a sect. " As soon as you

make a sect you protest against equality, and equality is no more.

Mohammedans talk of universal brotherhood, but what comes out of that in

reality? Why, anybody who is not a Mohammedan will not be admitted into the

brotherhood; he will more likely have his throat cut. Christians talk of

universal brotherhood; but anyone who is not a Christian must go to that

place where he will be eternally barbecued.

 

So far we see that it is hard to find any universal features in regard to

religion, and yet we know that they exist. We are all human beings, but are

we all equal? Certainly not. Who says we are equal? Only the lunatic. Are we

all equal in our brains, in our powers, in our bodies? One man is stronger

than another, one man has more brain power than another. If we are all

equal, why is there this inequality? Who made it? We. Because we have more

or less powers, more or less brain, more or less physical strength, it must

make a difference between us. Yet we know that the doctrine of equality

appeals to our heart.

 

The unity of sameness can come only when this universe is destroyed,

otherwise such a thing is impossible. Not only so, it would be dangerous to

have it. We must not wish that all of us should think alike. There would

then be no thought to think. We should be all alike, as the Egyptian mummies

in a museum, looking at each other without a thought to think. It is this

difference, this differentiation, this losing of the balance between us,

which is the very soul of our progress, the soul of all our thought. This

must always be.

 

We must learn that truth may be expressed in a hundred thousand ways, and

that each of these ways is true as far as it goes. We must learn that the

same thing can be viewed from a hundred different standpoints, and vet be

the same thing. Take for instance the sun. Suppose a man standing on the

earth looks at the sun when it rises in the morning; he sees a big ball.

Suppose he starts on a journey towards the sun and takes a camera with him,

taking photographs at every stage of his journey, until he reaches the sun.

The photographs of each stage will be seen to be different from those of the

other stages; in fact, when he gets back, he brings with him so many

photographs of so many different suns, as it would appear; and yet we know

that the same sun was photographed by the man at the different stages of his

progress.

 

Even so is it with the Lord. Through high philosophy or low, through the

most exalted mythology or the grossest, through the most refined ritualism

or arrant fetishism, every sect, every soul, every nation, every religion,

consciously or unconsciously, is struggling upward, towards God; every

vision of truth that man has, is a vision of Him and of none else. Suppose

we all go with vessels in our hands to fetch water from a lake. One has a

cup, another a jar, another a bucket, and so forth, and we all fill our

vessels. The water in each case naturally takes the form of the vessel

carried by each of us. He who brought the cup has the water in the form of a

cup; he who brought the jar — his water is in the shape of a jar, and so

forth; but, in every case, water, and nothing but water, is in the vessel. So

it is in the case of religion; our minds are like these vessels, and each

one of us is trying to arrive at the realisation of God. God is like that

water filling these different vessels, and in each vessel the vision of God

comes in the form of the vessel. Yet He is One. He is God in every case.

This is the only recognition of universality that we can get.

 

I have also my little plan. I do not know whether it will work or not, and I

want to present it to you for discussion. What is my plan? In the first

place I would ask mankind to recognise this maxim, " Do not destroy " .

Iconoclastic reformers do no good to the world. Break not, pull not anything

down, but build. Help, if you can; if you cannot, fold your hands and stand

by and see things go on. Do not injure, if you cannot render help. Say not a

word against any man's convictions so far as they are sincere. Secondly,

take man where he stands, and from there give him a lift.

 

If it be true that God is the centre of all religions, and that each of us

is moving towards Him along one of these radii, then it is certain that all

of us must reach that centre. And at the centre, where all the radii meet,

all our differences will cease; but until we reach there, differences there

must be. All these radii converge to the same centre. One, according to his

nature, travels along one of these lines, and another, along another; and if

we all push onward along our own lines, we shall surely come to the centre,

because, " All roads lead to Rome " . Each of us is naturally growing and

developing according to his own nature; each will in time come to know the

highest truth for after all, men must teach themselves.

 

What can you and I do? Do you think you can teach even a child? You cannot.

The child teaches himself. Your duty is to afford opportunities and to

remove obstacles. A plant grows. Do you make the plant grow? Your duty is to

put a hedge round it and see that no animal eats up the plant, and there

your duty ends. The plant grows of itself. So it is in regard to the

spiritual growth of every man. None can teach you; none can make a spiritual

man of you. You have to teach yourself; your growth must come from inside.

 

What can an external teacher do? He can remove the obstructions a little,

and there his duty ends. Therefore help, if you can; but do not destroy.

Give up all ideas that you can make men spiritual. It is impossible. There

is no other teacher to you than your own soul. Recognise this. What comes of

it? In society we see so many different natures. There are thousands and

thousands of varieties of minds and inclinations. A thorough generalisation

of them is impossible, but for our practical purpose it is sufficient to

have them characterised into four classes.

 

First, there is the active man, the worker; he wants to work, and there is

tremendous energy in his muscles and his nerves. His aim is to work — to

build hospitals, do charitable deeds, make streets, to plan and to organise.

Then there is the emotional man who loves the sublime and the beautiful to

an excessive degree. He loves to think of the beautiful, to enjoy the

aesthetic side of nature, and adore Love and the God of Love. He loves with

his whole heart the great souls of all times, the prophets of religions, and

the Incarnations of God on earth; he does not care whether reason can or

cannot prove that Christ or Buddha existed; he does not care for the exact

date when the Sermon on the Mount was preached, or for the exact moment of

Krishna's birth; what he cares for is their personalities, their lovable

figures. Such is his ideal.

 

This is the nature of the lover, the emotional man. Then, there is the

mystic whose mind wants to analyse its own self, to understand the workings

of the human mind, what the forces are that are working inside, and how to

know, manipulate, and obtain control over them. This is the mystical mind.

Then, there is the philosopher who wants to weigh everything and use his

intellect even beyond the possibilities of all human philosophy.

 

To become harmoniously balanced in all these four directions is my ideal of

religion. And this religion is attained by what we, in India, callYoga —

union. To the worker, it is union between men and the whole of humanity; to

the mystic, between his lower and Higher Self; to the lover, union between

himself and the God of Love; and to the philosopher; it is the union of all

existence. This is what is meant by Yoga. This is a Sanskrit term, and these

four divisions of Yoga have in Sanskrit different names. The man who seeks

after this kind of union is called a Yogi. The worker is called the

Karma-Yogi. He who seeks the union through love is called the Bhakti-Yogi.

He who seeks it through mysticism is called the Râja-Yogi. And he who seeks

it through philosophy is called the Jnâna-Yogi So this word Yogi comprises

them all.

 

The first test of true teaching must be, that the teaching should not

contradict reason. And you may see that such is the basis of all these

Yogas. We take the Raja-Yoga, the psychological Yoga, the psychological way

to union. It is a vast subject, and I can only point out to you now the

central idea of this Yoga. We have but one method of acquiring knowledge.

From the lowest man to the highest Yogi, all have to use the same method;

and that method is what is called concentration.

 

Now take Karma-Yoga, the attainment of God through work. It is evident that

in society there are many persons who seem to be born for some sort of

activity or other, whose minds cannot be concentrated on the plane of

thought alone, and who have but one idea, concretised in work, visible and

tangible. There must be a science for this kind of life too.

 

Each one of us is engaged in some work, but the majority of us fritter away

the greater portion of our energies, because we do not know the secret of

work. Karma-Yoga explains this secret and teaches where and how to work, how

to employ to the greatest advantage the largest part of our energies in the

work that is before us. But with this secret we must take into consideration

the great objection against work, namely that it causes pain. All misery and

pain come from attachment. I want to do work, I want to do good to a human

being; and it is ninety to one that that human being whom I have helped will

prove ungrateful and go against me; and the result to me is pain. Such

things deter mankind from working; and it spoils a good portion of the work

and energy of mankind, this fear of pain and misery. Karma-Yoga teaches us

how to work for work's sake, unattached, without caring who is helped, and

what for.

 

There is then the Bhakti-Yoga for the man of emotional nature, the lover. He

wants to love God, he relies upon and uses all sorts of rituals, flowers,

incense, beautiful buildings, forms and all such things. Do you mean to say

they are wrong? One fact I must tell you. It is good for you to remember, in

this country especially, that the world's great spiritual giants have all

been produced only by those religious sects which have been in possession of

very rich mythology and ritual. All sects that have attempted to worship God

without any form or ceremony have crushed without mercy everything that is

beautiful and sublime in religion.

 

We lastly come to the Jnana-Yogi, the philosopher, the thinker, he who wants

to go beyond the visible. He is the man who is not satisfied with the little

things of this world. His idea is to go beyond the daily routine of eating,

drinking, and so on; not even the teaching of thousands of books will

satisfy him. Not even all the sciences will satisfy him; at the best, they

only bring this little world before him.

 

Upon the same tree there are two birds, one on the top, the other below. The

one on the top is calm, silent, and majestic, immersed in his own glory; the

one on the lower branches, eating sweet and bitter fruits by turns, hopping

from branch to branch, is becoming happy and miserable by turns. After a

time the lower bird eats an exceptionally bitter fruit and gets disgustful

and looks up and sees the other bird, that wondrous one of golden plumage,

who eats neither sweet nor bitter fruit, who is neither happy nor miserable,

but calm, Self-centred, and sees nothing beyond his Self.

 

The lower bird longs for this condition but soon forgets it, and again

begins to eat the fruits. In a little while, he eats another exceptionally

bitter fruit, which makes him feel miserable, and he again looks up, and

tries to get nearer to the upper bird. Once more he forgets and after a time

he looks up, and so on he goes again and again, until he comes very near to

the beautiful bird and sees the reflection of light from his plumage playing

around his own body, and he feels a change and seems to melt away; still

nearer he comes, and everything about him melts away, and at last he

understands this wonderful change.

 

The lower bird was, as it were, only the substantial-looking shadow, the

reflection of the higher; he himself was in essence the upper bird all the

time. This eating of fruits, sweet and bitter, this lower, little bird,

weeping and happy by turns, was a vain chimera, a dream: all along, the real

bird was there above, calm and silent, glorious and majestic, beyond grief,

beyond sorrow. The upper bird is God, the Lord of this universe; and the

lower bird is the human soul, eating the sweet and bitter fruits of this

world. Now and then comes a heavy blow to the soul. For a time, he stops the

eating and goes towards the unknown God, and a flood of light comes. He

thinks that this world is a vain show. Yet again the senses drag hint down,

and he begins as before to eat the sweet and bitter fruits of the world.

Again an exceptionally hard blow comes.

 

His heart becomes open again to divine light; thus gradually he approaches

God, and as he gets nearer and nearer, he finds his old self melting away.

When he has come near enough, he sees that he is no other than God, and he

exclaims, " He whom I have described to you as the Life of this universe, as

present in the atom, and in suns and moons — He is the basis of our own

life, the Soul of our soul. Nay, thou art That. " This is what this

Jnana-Yoga teaches. It tells man that he is essentially divine. It shows to

mankind the real unity of being, and that each one of us is the Lord God

Himself, manifested on earth. All of us, from the lowest worm that crawls

under our feet to the highest beings to whom we look up with wonder and awe

— all are manifestations of the same Lord.

 

Lastly, it is imperative that all these various Yogas should be carried out

in, practice; mere theories about them will not do any good. First we have

to hear about them, then we have to think about them. We have to reason the

thoughts out, impress them on our minds, and we have to meditate on them,

realise them, until at last they become our whole life.

 

No longer will religion remain a bundle of ideas or theories, nor an

intellectual assent; it will enter into our very self. By means of

intellectual assent we may today to many foolish things, and

change our minds altogether tomorrow. But true religion never changes.

Religion is realisation; not talk, nor doctrine, nor theories, however

beautiful they may be. It is being and becoming, not hearing or

acknowledging; it is the whole soul becoming changed into what it believes.

That is religion.

 

http://prashantaboutindia.blogspot.com/2009/04/ideal-of-universal-religion-by-sw\

ami.html