Guest guest Posted July 4, 2009 Report Share Posted July 4, 2009 Dear Sirs, As per Ramayana, King Dasaratha had asked Lord Sri Rama to go to vanavasam for fourteen years and deputed Bharata, to rule the kingdom. This was done by him on the demand of kaikeyi, the third wife of Dasaratha. Lord Rama carried the instructions of his father and went to Aranyavasam, along with his wife Sita and brother Lakshmana. Bharatha, who had come to know the incident late, had approached Sri Rama, to come back to Ayodhya and take the power, for which Sri Rama had denied. This is ok. In the end, after Sita was released by Sri Rama, by killing Ravana, Sri Rama came back to Ayodhya with all, since the vanavasam period was completed at that time and ruled the country of Ayodhya, prosperously which was called Rama Rajya. Now, the doubt is, why SRI Rama had accepted to rule Ayodhya, when Bharatha was very much there and was appointed by his father Dasaratha. Here one thing should be noticed- Sri Rama was always obeyed the orders of his father Dasaratha and performed “ pitru palanaâ€. In that case how he has accepted the ruling of the country. Even if Bharatha wantedly offer also? I love Sri Rama and worship HIM. But I am not able to understand the logic behind this doing so by Lord Rama. May be some link/interpretation was there in Ramayana, which I missed to understand. Any one in the group may kindly clarify this point. Bhavadeeyudu MURALI KRISHNA Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here http://cricket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.