Guest guest Posted October 27, 2009 Report Share Posted October 27, 2009 In the text of Bhagavad Gita all the eighteen chapters are entitled Yoga – even the first chapter is considered to be yoga. Arjuna Vishada yoga. There is despair – I feel I cannot do something (or I see why I should not do something), and I come to a dead end. I see and appreciate only one side; but what is on the other side? Is there any other point of view? When I see my point of view it is my own mental projection, and that must come face to face with something else. Any one sided statement or dogmatic assertion is most probably untrue. If I declare that God is one, and if you believe God is trinity, you are wrong; so in my rightness, your wrongness is implied. Any declaration or dogmatic assertion is one sided, and therefore destructive. This one sided declaration may even be very nicely camouflaged, made to appear very nice, marvellous, glorious, highly spiritual. In the beginning of the second chapter, Krishna therefore confronts Arjuna's despair with quite number of different points of view. Sometimes people are a bit confused – " why don't you say this is the truth and get on with it? " – No, no, no. When Arjuna collapsed, saying – " I don't want to fight, war is wrong " , what he said seems to be very right, very moral, very nice, very glorious. But Krishna merely wants Arjuna to see himself for himself, aided only to the extent of being slapped back onto him; so he does not lead him by hand to the truth, but merely confronts him with another point of view. For instance, he even taunts him " if you run away from the battle, people will think that you are impotent, you are a useless fellow, you are frightened " (that has nothing to do with the philosophy of the Gita) Krishna even says, " they will talk ill of you, they will scandalise you, ridicule you and you shouldn't ask for this " . Later on the Gita, same Krishna says, " you must be completely balanced in praise and censure " , but here he says that Arjuna should avoid censure. That is you have expressed your point of view but there is another point of view, " if you run away from the battle they will think you are weak. They will slander you – disgraceful. Then of course, you are a soldier, prince – it is your duty to fight " All these are different aspects of the other points of view. You know your point of view, but also try to see if there is others – then it is possible to have an integral vision which may still be imperfect and non comprehensive, but you will at least know that as long as it is the human mind that is looking at this truth, it can only discern a part of it. All human discernment can only be partial and the partial is not true. The realisation that this partial discernment is not true, is the truth. Is that right? It's simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.