Guest guest Posted September 17, 2003 Report Share Posted September 17, 2003 Being in the writing profession with a mission, I meditated upon the disappointment of Jay about the radio documentary on Sister Nivedita. I have not heard the radio program on Nivedita, so my thoughts are in general and can be useful for a future program: I have some questions (and some comments about them.) 1. What was the motivation of the producer? To make money by creating sensations? If yes, then he or she should have chosen some other subject. 2. Does the producer have no idea about the spiritual depth of Sister Nivedita? If yes, he or she had reliable help available to ask questions and explore the life of the Sister. 3. Was the producer scarred of failure if he or she focused on the spiritual side of Sister Nivedita? But the program can fail if the focus is shifted to sensations also. Then why not stick to the main focus (that is spirituality) of the subject. 4. Is the Western attitude of downplaying (or even ignoring!) the spiritual greatness of the subject in play? If yes, this is not professional and ethical attitude, and it does not even do justice to the art of making documentary. At worst it is misleading. Can we go alone to create future documentaries and feature films, etc.? I do not think so. The world is One and and we must strive for worldwide appeal. That is the way to bring the Holy Trio, and spiritual personalities such as Sister Nivedita, to the masses. The key is to create popular appeal. If Lord Richard Attenborough (a Britisher) can succeed in bringing Gandhi to the masses with a popular appeal so can we (and anyone including Britishers) can do justice to the Holy Trio and other spiritual personalities. --Girish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.