Guest guest Posted April 15, 2005 Report Share Posted April 15, 2005 I am a Western Vedantist. I have never called or thought of myself as Hindu. I don't mean for the distinction to sound too esoteric. To me the word " Hindu " in English connotes a vast array of Hindu sects, none of which I wish to be included in. Not out of contempt or disregard, but mainly cultural upbringing and lack of exposure. In fact, I believe many early Ramakrishna Mission Swami's to the West have seen their mission as bringing the particular Vivekananda message to Westerners. It is true now there is a large dispora of Indian people in the West and that therefore all varieties of Hindu philosophies and sects are now emerging here, often with only Indian-born devotees. That seems like an entirely different ball game than the Vedanta I found haven in. I have known Indian immigrants in the West who have confided in me that they were better able to practice Vedanta as they met it in the West than at home in India. Apparently even for some Indians they can have unpleasant associations with Hinduism as they knew it in their upbringing amidst Indian culture. That is definitely true for many Christians too who find Vedanta a safe spiritual refuge from some alienating experiences found in some types of Christian practice. In my view the early Swami's saw the wisdom of focus on the needs and approaches most relevant to Westerners. Therefore, I have been most comfortable calling myself Vedantist. In fact, it a proud term to me. Hopefully one thing that the Ramakrishna movement will eventually iron out as time passes is how much of Vedanta is to be Indian culture and unnecessary for Westerners and what is universal. Are Hanuman and Genesha helpful to Western seekers initially, for example? I found them a barrier and totally alien to my culture--still do, but that does not interfere with my seeking and practice. Another example, I love Indian music of all sorts but that is with many years of learning to appreciate it. Western Vedanta is evolving its own musical expression as time is passing. In itself, although Indian culture is rich and wonderful, Western Vedantists do not necessarily have to become Indians to be Vedantists. We may not take up sitars and tablas. Not to be facetious, but I am told that the first thing some Hindu converts to Christianity used to do in India was to go out and buy a western suit and eat a hamburger! Likewise in the US we we have had many barefoot, red-headed American girls dressed in saffron saris here [from Terre Haute, Indiana no less,] who are vegetarian followers of Krishna. Has Hindu diet and dress, music, and stylized behavior or custom anything intrinsically necessary to universal truth really? It is all humorous and hopefully harmless. Of course their Christian mothers are quite alarmed at their sons and daughters! Personally, I have mixed feelings about Puja and flower offerings. It is a quandary. How shall Westerners practice our concepts in culturally meaningful ways without awkwardness? May we keep our shoes on? Our climates and cities are not barefoot friendly. Do you see my point, dear friends? I have also heard all the discussions and explanations of higher concepts of caste, but that too is not something I find helpful to modern circumstances or even much of a mental interest to my experiences of life. Yet we now have personals internet services in the USA with people seeking mates of their caste. That alone makes me prefer to call myself Vedantist, not Hindu, God bless each to their own ideas. The West will make of Vedanta what it chooses even as India will take up what it chooses of Western values, technologies and philosophical thought and make it Indian. And as we can see in history, Vedanta has found a new garden to grow in in the West that will produce it own cultural milieu that we now can not predict. After all, Christianity initially was a tiny sect in Judaism of " Jesus Jews " until it married the Roman Empire. India and the West are rapidly exchanging gifts and tomorrow will be a different world I am sure for both. Just my thoughts expressed hopefully with deep affection and respect for my Indian sisters and brothers. Tomikin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2005 Report Share Posted April 17, 2005 Hello Thomas, Yours was a very interesting mail. I have a few thoughts regarding this. I have always believed that Hinduism was never envisioned with any boundary in perspective. It was envisioned as a path for every iota that existed. I find it surprising that many perceive a difference in the way Vedanta/Hinduism is practiced in the West and the East. I sincerely feel that any school of thought was designed as much for the truth seeking individual as for the ignorant. If there are people who can derive solace and peace by imagining a form to their concept of Divinity, so be it. I am sure you agree with me that the end result of peace is more important than these trivials. Just like a pi or a delta or a theta in mathematics, ganesha and Hanuman were imagined as symbols for particular set of virtues in Hindu religion. Just like it is foolish to equate a bundle of symbols to mathematics itself, itis foolish to equate a set of forms to Hinduism and Vedanta. Having said that, I cannot think of any mathematician who could despise the importance of these symbols and so also it is vital that practitioners of any religion understand and respect the value of symbols. Religions have long designed practices that seem blind on the first look. If someone just cares to look at them carefully they are just actions which indicate the highest Vedanta. I guess with time people everywhere have tried to follow as much as they understood about practices and int he process we have forgotten what their true intent was. I am sure it is the same with every religion. This fact was thought about carefully by our ancestors who designed the practices.Owing to their forethought, we have most of practices intact albeit with forgotten meanings. Atleast for the true seeker these practices will guide him of the Ultimate Vedanta. Speaking about Western Hindus, Iam sure most of them would agree with me that they never really thought about their religious practices back in India. In India religion and spirituality was more a matter of habit rather than a thoughtful process. It is only when they are alienated form the motherland that they are forced to think about what they are doing since, resources for religious practices are scarse. Iam convinced that if people 'practised' Hinduism in India they would find it as easy and peaceful, if not more , as in the West. Having said all this, I think the right approach is to stop analysing why this happens and just seek the Ultimate Bliss. Why worry how things are in India or Isreal? Why worry how people think in the West or the East, why worry whether it is easy or tough to practice Vedanta or any school of thought? Let us just practice Vedanta as we know it. After all as I said earlier, the most important thing is to attain Peace rather than analyse why. regards ********************************************************************************\ ************************************************** Chetan Yadati #229, North Duncan, Apt 6 Master's Student Phone: 405-533-2468 Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Oklahoma State University Stillwater OK-74075 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.