Guest guest Posted April 18, 2005 Report Share Posted April 18, 2005 Mr. Thomas Rea is certainly welcome to his views. He is a Vedantist and no true Hindu will ever ask him to call himself a Hindu. Hinduism (Sanatana Dharma)is extreemly liberal in this regard. What is essential is individual's spiritual progress. If the person is able to overcome his evil tendencies and is able to cultivate desirable qualities(God-like qualities)in himself, nothing else is needed. It is immaterial what he calls himself. There is only one caution and that is: every one knows that all people are not at the same level of mental makeup and need different ways to reach the same goal. Hinduism or Sanatan Dharma's beauty is that it provides limtless variety of ways to achieve the same goal. It includes 'Vedanta' as one of the many ways to reach God. The ultimate goal of a Vedantist and a worshipper of an idol is the same, however approach and methodlolgy adopted is different depending upon each ones level of progress and upbringing. Therefore as Sri Ramakrishna says 'Have respect for every way that leads to God,but put your whole heart in your own chosen path and tenaciously go forward on it.' Sri Ramakrishna himself started as a 'pujari' of mother Kali and he in his life verified all the various approaches of reaching the highest and found it to be the same, and this included Vedantist's way also. Totapuri, his vedantist Guru was amazed to find him achieving 'Nrivikalp Sanadhi' in three days, which he had taken forty years of sterneous effort (Tapasiya) to achieve. Even after reaching the pinnacle of spiritual life, Sri Ramakrishna continued to remain all his life a simple child of his mother Kali! That is the greatness of a Hindu. He loves and respects all ways that lead to God simultaneously holding on to his faith and approach. Chetan Merani --- Ramakrishna wrote: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:31:47 -0700 Thomas Rea <tomikin Are Vedantists Hindus? I am a Western Vedantist. I have never called or thought of myself as Hindu. I don't mean for the distinction to sound too esoteric. To me the word " Hindu " in English connotes a vast array of Hindu sects, none of which I wish to be included in. Not out of contempt or disregard, but mainly cultural upbringing and lack of exposure. In fact, I believe many early Ramakrishna Mission Swami's to the West have seen their mission as bringing the particular Vivekananda message to Westerners. ------Message truncated------ Chetan Merani Plan great trips with Travel: Now over 17,000 guides! http://travel./p-travelguide Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 18, 2005 Report Share Posted April 18, 2005 Dear Thomas, Religon as followed by Hindus is Inclusive and accepts all methods for searching the ultimate Truth or Self or Brahmana or God with a Form or without it, apersonal God or an impersonal cosmic Infinity. The form includes Krishana or Rama or Ganesh or Hanuman or thousands of other. Whichever or whatever gives you joy of seeking is Good enough for you to practice without rejecting what others practice. Only important thing is to always seek the Divine Grace and follow our right full duty called 'DHARMA' By Hindus or Humans all over the world. ______________________ India Matrimony: Find your life partner online Go to: http://.shaadi.com/india-matrimony Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.